| Philosophical Analysis:
Deciding on the remedy is only half the work done in situations
like these. Before we see the follow up management, it is important
to get a good philosophical grasp of the pathology one is dealing
with in order to have a good long term management strategy. As a
teacher, this is how I teach my students to handle serious pathology
in any clinical setting.
First, we need to understand the pathology one is dealing
with:
Chronic
pancreatitis (CP) is an inflammatory disease of the pancreas which
leads to persistent and progressive morphological and functional
alterations of the whole organ. In the terminal state of the disease
the extended fibrosis leads to exocrine and endocrine pancreatic
insufficiencies. Histomorphologically, the chronic inflammation
of the pancreas is often characterized by:
- pancreatic head enlargement
- calcifications
- pseudocyst formation
- fibrosis and atrophy
The leading clinical symptoms in chronic pancreatitis are upper
abdominal pain and maldigestion.
I like to use a clear concept of form-function-structure in every
clinical situation I encounter as it helps us to get deeper insight
to the clinical state that needs to be cured. Once the patient presents
with complaints, it is important for the clinician to comprehend
the degree/level of disturbance in function as well as nature of
changes in the tissues and organs responsible for this symptom expression.
I will explain how I use this concept.
What is perceptible to the homeopath are the external signs and
symptoms. Based on this we recognize the disease and perceive it
as a FORM (symptom expression) that evolves over a period of time.
This expression keeps changing as the patient interacts with his
environment. Ultimately changes in STRUCTURE take place. In other
words, changing FORMS express themselves to us through disease complaints
which result in structural changes over time. When we appreciate
the interrelationships between these various expressions, we perceive
a PATTERN in the expression of this form - which is the symptom
picture that indicates a similimum remedy.
Diseases arise due to a fault in the functioning of a system. Thus
a FORM is an expression of disturbances in the organ function. These
disturbances of FUNCTION over a period of time produce a disturbance
in the STRUCTURE and then, the latter aggravates the former. Thus
a vicious circle is set up in chronic diseases. Again both these
disturbances are revealed to us through changing complaints -->
changing FORMS (pictures).
In other words, as the disease progresses, it is revealed to us
in a continued change in FORM, FUNCTION AND STRUCTURE. It is important
to have an integrated understanding of this phenomenon for management
of serious diseases.
Based on an understanding of this inter-related phenomenon, one
can arrive at logical formulations about following homeopathic parameters:
i) Susceptibility of the patient:
– Seat of disease
– Nature of changes
– Rate of changes --> pace of disease.
ii) Miasmatic diagnosis: Identification of the
dominant miasm as well as degree of miasmatic activity.
iii) Posology formulations
iv) Phase diagnosis: Accurate identification of
the current phase for a remedy choice :- constitutional , chronic,
acute or purely antimiasmatic. We also get insight about possible
pattern in which the case might unfold --> future projections.
Now, let us apply this model to appreciate different clinical
patterns of chronic pancreatitis:
A) The Form: is the acute sudden expression of
excruciating abdominal pain extending to the back. This is often
precipitated by increased consumption of alcohol .
The Funtion: Raised Serum Amylase Levels with
indigestion.
The Structure: Acute inflammation of ductal and
acinar cells which over time undergo fibrosis following frequent
relapses.
* Phase — Acute exacerbation of relapsing pancreatitis
* Susceptibility — moderate to high
* Miasm — Acute exacerbation of tubercular miasm.
* Therapeutic planning: Quite often a stong expression of Form
in which the Pain expression dominates and requires an acute medicine
like Chelidonium, Colocynth, Mag. Phos., Phos etc. When gastric
irritation is a strong concomitant, which it was not in this case,
IRIS, NUX VOMICA, Arsenic alb etc. would be indicated.
* If pain is not clearly defined, it is desirable instead to
start with a constitutional remedy.
* If an acute is prescribed, it should be followed sooner rather
than later, with the chronic constitutional , while keeping track
of the changes in serum amylase level .
* Constitutional medicine: 200 potency or higher and requires
INFREQUENT DOSES
B) The Form: This has relapsing features:
- severe epigastric pain with or without radiations
And constant features:
- Weight loss
- Abdominal bloating
- bulky foul smelling stool with oil droplets
- Polyurea/Polydypsia
The Function:
Increased Serum amylase
Poor Digestion and absorption
Impaired metabolism
Raised blood sugar
The Structure: 80% PANCREATIC FUNCTION DESTROYED
Phase : Chronic expression.
Hence, initiate treatment with chronic/constitutional .
Susceptibility : Moderate to Low
Miasm : Advanced Tubercular miasm
Posology : 30 potency (medium to low) and will
require frequent repetition.
Prognosis & Homoeopathic Projections:
According to modern medicine, Chronic pancreatitis implies the
presence of irreversible damage to the pancreas. In the presence
of diabetes mellitus and pancreatic insufficiency, the prognosis
becomes guarded. The survival rate in some series in the presence
of such complications is less than 10 years. Classical Homoeopathic
experience is otherwise. The following points should be kept in
mind for management of Acute on Chronic Pancreatitis:
* The Susceptibility here is moderate to low. So one must start
with the 30 potency of constitutional and gradually build up the
repetition depending on the sensitivity of the system.
* Judicious use of Tub. bov. as the intercurrent antimiasmatic
helps a lot in improving the susceptibility of the patient.
* They may present with an acute exacerbation of symptoms. In such
instances, if a clear cut Form is expressed, only then treat that
phase of symptom expression with a different (acute)medicine; otherwise
it's advisable to enhance your repetition or potency of the constitutional
remedy instead.
* During course of treatment, they may present with episodes of
loose motion; DO NOT TREAT THIS WITH UNNECESSARY SUPERFICIAL MEDICINES
* Often they develop skin rashes. Here one must learn to differentiate
between exteriorization of symptoms, and opportunistic / staphylococcal
and fungal infections due to Diabetes Mellitus or poor general health
and hygiene so take appropriate measures.
Education and Ancillary Measures
The cause of chronic pancreatitis, which is invariably alcohol
, should be emphasized. The patient should be told that unless alcohol
consumption is discontinued, no improvement can be expected. An
explanation of the various complications encountered with chronic
pancreatitis should be explained to both patient and family.
* Treat rationally the Diabetes mellitus, if necessary, with
required doses of INSULIN. Gradually taper off insulin as pancreatic
function improves.
* Pay attention to protein diet and diabetic diet.
Let us understand the intricacies of the philosophical explanations
above through the management of this case.
Follow up Synopsis for 1st 1 month of treatment
:
23/3/1994 to 26/4/1994
Since the patient was admitted with an acute excruciating pain
which made him quite restless, the first line of treatment was an
acute remedy. This is typical of the type A expression
of Form - Function - Structure explained above.
The analysis of his symptoms indicated Colocynth.
It was given in 200C 2 hourly. With no significant
relief after 4 doses, he was switched over to Mag Phos 200
2 hourly and later 4 hourly. There was significant relief in his
distress within 4 hours but the Mag Phos 200 4
hourly was continued for 3 days.
Now was the need to start the chronic remedy as the constitutional features were beginning to become more evident.
The KALI-IOD 200 was given at bed time every night,
while the Mag Phos was going forward. Later Kali
Iod was increased to a b.i.d. [two times a day] and then t.d.s.[three
times a day] dosage.
Tub bov 1M 1 dose interpolated on 19/4/1994.
Other measures:
He was advised on other ancillary measures to support the healing
process.
- Diabetic diet
- High protein diet
- INSULIN : Inj. Norsuline (Plain) 10 units
Inj. Monosuline (Lente) 16 units
Inj. Insulin doses were adjusted to regular investigation of
blood sugar levels. Subjective features mentioned in the initial
history promptly disappeared. Jaundice also improved. Serum
amylase level was still high at this point of time.
Follow up Synopsis of the following 1.5
years of treatment:
27/4/1994 to 31/12/1995
* There was not a single episode of Jaundice or acute exacerbation
of pancreatitis.
* He had recurrent bouts of loose stools which required Podophyllum
200 and later Podo 1M.
* On 9/11/1994 – He developed several boils all over the
body which required Calcarea sulf 30 qds [four
times a day] for a week.
* On 9/12/95 he had one episode of URTI [upper respiratory tract
infection] that required Ars alb 200.
* Serum amylase returned to Normal by 6/12/1994
(42 SC units/100ml ), nearly 8 months after the start of treatment.
LFT and lipids became normal by 1/5/1995, a little over a year
since Kali Iod was started.
Blood sugar remained stable in contrast to fluctuating, unstable
levels before treatment began.
Fasting Sugar = 65 and Post Prandial = 70. Inj. INSULIN had to be
reduced considerably to adjust to the new sugar levels.
* Over all his irritability and mental state improved quickly in
the initial phase of treatment, but his relationship with his wife
remained almost the same. His wife ran away to her parents place
at Bihar. The patient went to bring her back but he was very angry
with her. He felt like killing her! He even got into a physical
fight with his brother-in-law who tried to defend her. Both were
in an enraged state of mind and the patient stabbed him. Luckily
the Brother-in-law survived. But the patient turned himself in and
was arrested. He was sent to jail for 3 months.
* From 27/4/1994 to 9/8/1994: He was on Kali-iod 200
4 hourly.
Tub bov 1M was interpolated twice
* From 9/8/1994 to 31/12/95: The potency was increased to Kali-iod
1M 1 dose every night. During this phase the Laboratory Parameters
began to improve and returned to normal .
* From 1/1/1996: all active medication was discontinued as he remained
stable and normal clinically as well as from biochemical angle.
His L.F.T was rechecked and it was W.N.L .
* 10/2/1999: He brought one of his neighbours for treatment with
us. We observed that the patient had mellowed down considerably.
This was also attributed to his parents demise. He had developed
Grief++, Guilt+, “I did not listen to my Father”. His
wife had left him and he felt very lonely. His Diabetes Mellitus
remained under control . He had no other health problems.
References:
1. Medicine for Practising Physicians: J. Willis Hurst
2. Text book of Pathology: Willium Boyd
4. Materia Medica: Hering, Phatak, Robert, Kent.
5. Chronic Pancreatitis: New Pathological Aspects, Shailesh Shrikhande,
Helmut Fries, Marcus E. Bombay Hospital Journal Vol .44 - No.4,
1999.
This article was published in ijhm vol . 33 issue 1/2000-2001
Dr. Praful M Barvalia, MD(Hom)
Shalibhadra Society
148, Hingwala Lane Extention
Near Popular Hotel
Ghatkoper (East)
Mumbai 400077
Ph: 91-22 - 2516 5985
91-22 - 2513 4467
Email: drpraful@mtnl.net.in
spandan@holisticfoundation.org
Website: www.holisticfoundation.org
|