|
| |||||||||||
| ||||||||||||
Forums
Courses
Shop
Diseases
Articles
Journal
Directory| |
|||||
Cured Cases |
|||||
| |
|||||
| Hpathy Ezine - January, 2009 | |||||
|
|||||
| 'This following is a dialogue by Dr. Fayeton and others on the remedy Carcinosin. The discussion centers on the case of Laura and reveals the evolution of the themes of this remedy. The hypothesis of Ramon revealed a Carcinosin patient who sees God as a tyrant whom he refuses to listen to or obey. Following Agnès Flour’s observation I discover the following themes in Laura’s case: - Theme of support (including the strength to sacrifice her own pleasure for the benefit of others) - The 6th nucleus of internal reconciliation: after a terrible struggle, she accepts the sacrifice and finds peace and joy.
Theme of support: ‘The drama with my father (19 days of coma and the enduring consequences), nobody noticed it because my father has the same nature to endure as I have. I am more courageous than anybody else, I follow my way and for a long time people told me that I resembled my father, it annoyed me.’ She often talks about her strength and her self-denial but we notice that this sacrifice does not bring her happiness. ‘When I assume a duty, it is like a castigation’ or ‘the burden of responsibility which appears from all sides.’ And she weeps saying she has always been at the service of the whole family. She feels exhausted and only has had one happy moment in her life: the birth of her daughter. ‘I am very obedient, I am hyper-obedient, more so than other people.’ In her life story we notice that when she can, she will avoid discipline: she lied to her mum when she was told to have an injection against her cough, but tore the prescriptions and didn’t go. She upsets the discipline in the dancing class because something does not go the way she wants. She has a love life outside the social norm for where she lives, where marriage is sacred: She divorces, has a lover then a second one whom she marries. She has her own religion, ‘I am not religious in the way the church teaches us, my God is not the one that was crucified. I am a believer in my own way, I believe in my own God and energy that is within me, which is part of me.’ (meaning: a God who has no existence for whom one will not become a martyr)’ Laura wants the strength but she refuses to acknowledge that the strength of the martyr would be the virtue of strength. But she cures her nostalgia of home by finding an image of Jesus on a Hindu altar. She says that she likes the popular fetes in honour of the Virgin Mary, because they resonate with her daily life: She adores her mother, her father is a beast, a dangerous wolf. As soon as she is getting better she realises that her father loves her. (And she participates in the Good Friday precession.) We can conclude there is something wrong in her affirmation of being disciplined; it is an egotrophic affirmation: ‘I am obedient,…’ , it is what she says but the way she lives her life shows it is not really true. Of course, being a homeopath we should not make a moral judgement, but from a dynamic miasmatic diagnostic point of view, she states something that she does not really do. ‘To keep one’s promises is a castigation.’ It is a castigation because she feels obliged to keep them and she does not know whether she follows her own will or that of others. In the same sense: keeping your word, giving herself to the truth, … does not make her flourish: she keeps going using her moral force, but it annoys her. It is the sacrifice without joy of egotrophy in the first degree. In my opinion Carsinosin is not the remedy of those who had a rigid education, but for those who complain about it. Is the ‘reservation’ of Carcinosin not the fear of being called to be sacrificed? ‘Let’s not be noticed, too much could be asked of us.’ Some people would say it is best not to be noticed too much by God, He may want to ask more from us than we wish to give. In this case Carsinosin is one of the remedies to consider. The 6th nucleus. When Laura offers something of herself, her hair, we can see the 6th nucleus of internal ‘reconciliation’: after a struggle she accepts a sacrifice and find peace and joy. Conclusion: Carcinosin wishes the strength was given to man to escape death and not to transgress it, to achieve immortality without sacrifice. Carcinosin refused the strength for the martyr, for the sacrifice, and therefore loses strength. Egotrophy 1st degree: Carcinosin will have an increased sense of sacrifice, it is the eternal sacrifice. But it is a sacrifice without joy. It is not a fire of joy but a black cloud. Egotrophy 2nd degree: Carcinoson will find the strength to immortalise alone and not expect to be resuscitated by God. In the light of this work, there is an interesting comment by Enrique Caturla Martinez on children who appeared dead in utero, who confirm the idea of the passage to life through a challenge of death: a dying-resurrection. Would it be possible to express Carcinosin in a more universal way by saying: Carcinosin wanted to offer himself immortality and lost the strength. Therefore his mistake relates to the force that enables the passage of this life to immortality. Man, through his own forces, cannot achieve this passage; he needs to receive the Divine Force to accomplish the sacrifice (obedience) requested of him and receive the Divine energies of resurrection. He refuses to receive the force of resurrection, he wishes to give it to himself. He refused the need for assistance of the Divine Force. He wanted that the force of man were sufficient. In a certain way Laura expressed this concept: ‘I am a believer in my own way, I believe in my own God, and energy that is there, inside me, which is part of me.’ When Enrique asks: ‘When you say spiritual, what do you mean?’ She answers in terms of the vital force. Carcinosin refuses to pass through death according to a plan received by his creator (apoptose), he wishes to immortalise using his own natural forces, his capacity to multiply mitosis, he refuses the radical transformation that God wants for him through the trusting of His hands, to achieve a higher level by uniting his tiny human force to the infinite Divine Force. He does not want to make that sacrifice, to undergo this. One would think that Adam (Bible) was not to go through the passage of death but needed to accept an act of obedience to achieve eternal grace. His immortality was such a gift added to his nature that he lost it through his disobedience of the Giver (following the instructions that come with the present). Castigation, he loses both the physical force and the virtue of the force, those to endure evil until the sacrifice. Adam needed to renounce part of his desire of grace, being immediate like God. (Impatience of Carcinosin) In egotrophy 1st degree: he shows he has the physical strength to endure until sacrifice but he cannot achieve joy, the joy God reserves for his obedient faithful. In egotrophy 2nd degree: I enjoy the spiritual joy without the need to support anything, I have it through the energy that is within me and I don’t need to adapt to any rules. I broke down all the barriers, I fulfil myself without limits (like the cancerous cells gone mad with their mitosis that escape all control). In egolysis: there is no strength for anything anymore, he panics in front of the least ordeal and gives up. In heterolysis: He shows others their weakness, their egoism, their disobedience, their incapacity to endure We can conclude that all cancerous cells carry the similitude of the problem of Carcinosin, whatever the origin of the tissue or the problem of the patient that carries the cancer cells. This desire to carry in oneself all the strength of immortality without receiving from others, explains all the digestive problems (constipation) and anorexia: if my cells are immortal, they don’t need to nourish themselves. It is not surprising that Dr. T Smits says the following: ‘Carsinosin has the sensation he needs to do something for himself to improve his health.’ It is true that my health is somewhat dependant on my right attitude. The metaphysical error of Carsinosin is to believe that he gives mortality to himself. Dr. SML Fayeton, 05/07/04 Dr. Agnes Flour, March 2008. Egotrophy of the 1st degree relates to all cancers. Anybody can develop a cancer because of our fascination for the egotrophy of the 1st degree, this force that could support all the weakness of the flesh. The strength of the human soul without limits. This process is present in the Carcinogenese, even in persons who are not Carcinosin. People who have cancers and are not Carcinosin are fascinated by the force of Carcinosin. Did Carcinosin envy the force of Divine creation which can, when it wants, decide to bring the animated being to life, starting from nothing? Hypothesis, SML Fayeton and Marcelo Gerstner 04/09/08. SML Fayeton: The refusal I don’t think he envies the Divine force which created from nothing, this belongs to Conium. He envies the plenitude of life. He wants to be immortal, independent of the Divine force which made him rise from nothing, sustains him at any time in life and resuscitates him when he dies. But also, he refuses to depend of any external force that tries to guide his life, harmonise him with something other than himself, measure him, slow him down in his expansion. Sacrifice: (Merriam-Webster): An act of offering to a deity something precious, something offered in sacrifice, destruction or surrender of something for the sake of something else, something given up or lost. When you sacrifice something you give it up and give it to something or someone else, you take into account somebody else and this includes also a limitation of one’s own expansion. The refusal to depend on an exterior force incorporates perfectly the hypothesis of Ramon Frendo: He sees God as a tyrant and he projects this view onto his father; that is why he pretends to be a victim of an education that was too strict. The cancerous cell loses its differentiation (Agnes Flour). It is logical. If I want to exist on my own, I don’t need to differentiate. Differentiation implies the exchange of different competences united in a common project. Dr. Degroote said: ‘They have the ideas of others and appropriate them, but they have no personality themselves.’ In egotrophy, we see them on the outlook for celebrity. The Divine attribute envied. In respect of all the information about cancerous cells given to us by Agnès Flour, can we say that the Divine attribute envied by the Carcinosin patient is this fullness of life which is inside the person without any external force? Laura says: ‘this drama, I carry it myself and I do not share it with anybody.’ The cancerous cell multiplies without restraint, completely independent of any external influence trying to modify, control, stop its actions and it invades everything, because a cancer in a body wishes to exist alone, devour all, that all other cells cannot exist but through her, that nothing exists outside her. Carcinosin wants to become one with all that exists so that everything exists in him. He becomes the force of everything that transforms inside himself, he sacrifices nothing of his possible development for the existence of the others around him, he supports everything so that everything that exists becomes him. Marcelo Gerstner: Yes, I really think it is the way you say it. He envied the fullness of life absolutely immanent from God who is the perfect act of life because He is totally action, without any potential need to acquire further perfection coming from outside, or from the relation with the exterior. Also, this perfect life implies there is no need for God to relate to the outside, for God, the outside does not exist. The envied Divine attribute is the absolute immanence, even in relations. SML Fayeton: Therefore the mistake of Carcinosin is the Divine perfection he aspires to, the perfect immanence even in relationship. Carcinosin cannot realise this perfect immanence within his human condition. Only in God, the relations between people can be immanent. The refusal of death and sacrifice are only aspects of Carcinosin who does not want to be under the influence of something else apart from himself, or being ‘abandoned’ to another power but himself. Conclusions: The suffering: Having wanted to integrate everything inside himself to exert a perfect immanent action with no need for an external force, he lost the strength to come out of himself to create an exchange with others. Laura cannot say: “I love you”. Others are perceived to be a painful test, that one’s own reaction is not perfect because it is not solely immanent. This leads to introversion (protect against exchanges with others): reserved, secret, impressionable, timid, aversion to being touched, consoled, questioned, evaluated (panic from evaluations), allergy. He loses the strength to act outside himself, (resorts to writing, study) and loses the love of others who feel manipulated by him (feels abandoned). He always wants to be in the act: insomnia, fear of not being able to fall asleep, ameliorated by an act of willpower. In God, the relation between people is absolutely immanent. This, Carcinosin cannot imitate, therefore great need for love, looks for affection and cajoling all the time, in an exaggerated manner. Egotrophy in 1st degree: Because intelligence is the immanent faculty of man, Carcinosin prefers intellectual life. (brilliant and precocity) In other cases, will be full of love for others (exalts their capacity for exchanges). He tries to attract the lost relation by being very obedient, always trying to please others, to sacrifice himself in a compulsive way because he cannot compensate the loss of love, he cannot achieve joy. He will highlight his differentiation, wants to be popular. Egotrophy 2nd degree: Nothing exists outside me, if something exists I will integrate it into me. I will carry all, all the worries and secrets of the family, all the maledictions of the previous generations. Or I will devour and transform everything into its own substance, I will make them work for me; large companies that make others go broke and then buy them for the symbolic pound to make them work for their own profit. Nothing of my desire for expansion is sacrificed to allow the existence of others. Heterolysis: Reproaches others that they cannot sacrifice themselves, that they cannot give. Egolysis: painfully accepts the loss of the exchanges with the surroundings. Indifference, closed into himself, no personality, insulates from others, does not play with others, children daydreaming, poor school performance, dyslexia, precocious masturbation, anorexia, constipation and why not autism. The damned prisoner (Hypothesis Dr. M. Zala). Cured: He will enjoy immanence fully, not in the way God does it, but the way it is designed for humans: a composition of human and body. His inclination will be to communicate to others the fruits of internal contemplation of his Creator (and not of himself) which will give his soul the strength to deprive himself out of love for the other, whose existence and needs he recognises. |
|||||
| <-- Page 1 | |||||
|
|||||
