|
The number of homeopathic medicines is increasingly very rapidly. Everyone around is proving some new remedy. Pharmacies are
selling medicines that have no clinical confirmation and authors are adding medicines to our materia medica, repertories and
software on the basis of a single non-confirmed proving. Is this rapid growth of data without any quality control, reprovings
and clinical confirmation good for our materia medica. Will more medicines make finding the simillimum easier or will
the lack of quality control and clinical confirmation will make our materia medica less reliable? Vote in our current
poll and share your opinion.
To improve the usefulness and quality of our materia medica, our focus should be on -
a. Proving New Medicines.
b. Reproving Smaller and Non-proven Medicines.
c. Clinical Confirmation of Existing Data.
d. All the above.
Feel free to explain your choice.
- Click
here to cast your vote & Share your views.
| 
