 |
|
|||||||||||
|
||||||||||||
Forums
Courses
Shop
Diseases
Articles
Journal
Directory| |
|||
Feedback - Homeopathy 4 Everyone |
|||
| Hpathy Ezine - April, 2007 | |||
Send us your feedback, views, comments and suggestions about various articles published in Homeopathy 4 Everyone and Hpathy.com in general at editor@hpathy.com. Your feedback is very important to us! |
|||
|
Firstly I would like to say how much I always enjoy your ezine. There is always something in it that touches me in some way. I am not a qualified homoeopath, merely someone with a deep interest, and pretty extensive personal use. I have done some courses, and a fair amount of studying for myself but the opportunity to study it to the level I would like has not arrived yet. However, despite my lack of knowledge and experience, I found
much that resonated with me in the editorial. I have visited homoeopaths
(with all the appropriate qualifications) and found their knowledge
frighteningly lacking. I have sat and listened to a homoeopath tell
me about certain remedies and have known that they had got their
remedies mixed up; tentative suggestions by me that they might like
to recheck have been ignored - what does the patient know? Then
I have gone away and verified my own belief. I have met homoeopaths
who take shortcuts because of overconfidence, then seen them make
very bad prescriptions using knowledge they think they have but
which is actually inaccurate or incomplete. Naturally this has led
me to changing homoeopaths. I have then been in the situation of
listening to one homoeopath making scathing remarks about others.
Incidently it's often the ones who are least successful who make
the most criticism of others. I have witnessed the rivalry between
opposing schools. I have also noticed that many homoeopaths, when
faced with a serious health problem, often start to think rather
conventionally, in terms of what the disease is called etc. Whilst
I realise that homoeopaths have to be careful, and may need to suggest
to a patient that they should see their doctor as a safeguard, I
find it very strange when a homoeopath starts trying to give you
a conventional diagnosis. Firstly, this is something they are not
qualified to do, and secondly it is pretty irrelevant in terms of
homoeopathic cure. I have listened to homoepaths telling me about
other cases they have, and heard the criticism of their patients
in the telling. They seem unable to see their patients behaviour
as symtoms but label them as bad patients or bad people and then
it seems to be the patient's fault they do not get well. I am using homoepathy rather intensively at present, and am slowly recovering from a very long serious illness. I have experienced first hand the best and worst of homoeopathy. On my journey I have learned much about myself and I feel I would like to take my knowledge of homoeopathy much further in the future. However, I am not ready to do so until I feel I am healthy enough on all levels. So yes, I do believe that the problem is simply that homoeopaths are people, and people have flaws - issues that need resolving, lack of health on various levels. I also think, it's because when you are on a journey towards health, there is a tendancy to look back at where you were earlier and feel that you won't go there again, so that when you see people with problems similar to the ones you used to have there is a tendancy to feel a bit superior to them in a way, a sort of 'thank goodness I'm not like that anymore' - without the realisation that you haven't moved far enough away from the problem yet to be more objective about it, and more compassionate to someone who hasn't moved on from that point yet. I think a lot of people are drawn into homoeopathy because it has made life better for them in some way, but often lose sight of the fact that their personal journey is not yet complete (is it ever?). It's a bit like the fervour of an ex-smoker, who is suddenly totally intolerant of other smokers, but has forgotten how difficult it is to kick the habit and how much support someone needs to do so. To make matters worse, they may then extrapolate their feelings so that they are intolerant of anyone with a bad habit (that's most of us then!) In short, we are all on a journey, and will never be perfect,
but we need to remember that fact, whether in our attitude to homoeopathy,
or simply in the way we treat people in everyday life. I commend
your editorial for bringing this out into the open. Let us all look
to our own weaknesses before we find fault in others, to assign
blame in neither case, and to have the strength to hold honesty
and compassion as equal partners. This, I believe is one small but
important part of being a true healer. ---------------------------------------- Yes I was impressed with Grant's Article. So much so that I ordered
his book. I hope this is the answer I have been looking for in finding
the Miasims, as you probably also think, Miasims are the most difficult
problems in Homeopathy to find. ---------------------------------------- I did read the March issue on Miasms and Facial Analysis, loved it, I want my face analyzed!!!! Is it possible to do that, send a photo for an analysis? Sherry ---------------------------------------- Dear Gabrielle CHRISTIAN P. RYAN BS AAS ---------------------------------------- I have to tell you that I have been reading the ezine for quite some time and I have always enjoyed what I read. I have liked all the growth and forward changes that have been happening. Now with the newest changes...WOW! I am self taught and love to
learn. Up until today, I usually have been able to finish the ezine
rather quickly and delete to move onto other work...but, I have
to save this one as I was only I can not wait to get back to my reading.... Keep up the wonderful thoughts and articles. rita chalfant ---------------------------------------- Dear Sir: Thank you for the opportunity you gave me to say something about
this subject. I am sure you will divulge this opinion. ---------------------------------------- I love the new mp3 files and PowerPoint presentations, and the
fascinating articles in this month's ezine (for example, Grant Bentley's
article, and the article on aggravation). I do wish, though, you
would include at least one veterinary case each month, since that's
my particular focus. ---------------------------------------------- Dear sirs, ------------------------------------- Dear Manish, I read your editorial, is written with passion and wisdom. You
are eloquent and I feel you may play a role in reversing the climate
of superficiality and degeneration which is going on at the moment
in our ranks. ------------------------------------- Dear Manish ------------------------------------- im regular reader of hpathy magazine. i find it very intresting
and enriched with \knowledge , currently i m in pune working as
a consultant homeopath for dr batras positive health clinic pvt
ltd , i will definately share my cases with u in future , thanks
for such beautiful and creative work by u and ur team , i really ------------------------------------- Dear Editor, ------------------------------------- Dear Editor, I have read the article Defending Homeopathy by Alan V. Schmukler
with great interest. His presentation was Apart from doctors, even the followers of homeopathy are under
constant criticism. Your such articles will Well done sir.. regards R Venkat,Dubai ------------------------------------- DR. J.B. CHIEF EDITOR It IS DIFFICULT TO TELL THE TRUTH PUBLICALLY, THIS TYPE OF CONDUCT YOU HAVE DESCRIBE BY FEW, ARE THE BASIC FOR MANY OF THE PROBLEMS WE HAVE, NOW A DAY, WE HAVE A WONDERFUL SYSTEM, BUT IS VERY INEXPENSIVE AND VERY EFFICIENT, i KNOW WITH &5. OO DOLLARS AT THAT TIME CURE MY EPILEPSY WITH MINER SALTS, AS DOCTORS WANTED TO PERFORM A NUMBER OF OPERATIONS W/APPROXIMATED VALUE OF 100.00O.OO AND THE RISK OF DAMAGE TO THE BRAIN, SO THE MEDICAL COMMUNITY DO NOT WANT TO KNOW THIS, EVERY TIME I MENTION THIS TO A DOCTOR, THEY BECOME OUTRAGE, IT IS TOO SIMPLE, TOO INEXPENSIVE AND TOO GOOD, WE MUST BRING UNITY AND EXPOSE THE GUILTY PARTIES, SO OUR MEDICINE WILL REACH ITS PEAK. A,CANDOLFI.HOMEOPATHY ------------------------------------- Dear Dr Manish, ------------------------------------- Dear sir, ------------------------------------- thankyou once again for such a marvellous journal ,and serving
so nicely to ho.moeopathic community,it is helpful to people like
me to benefit from this journal sitting at home and sharing our
experiences and difficulties and gain guidance from stalwarts and
seniors in our proffession ,i m practising since 10 yrs in bhiwandi
which is 55 kms. from bombay,and working on two theories ,relationship
of mountoux test with latent tubercular m iasms and how possibly
our medecines act phisiologically through fundamental physiological
phenomena of action potential,depolarisation, ,and all or none phenomenon,i
will shortly send my works Have you checked out the new-look www.indiatimes.com
yet? ------------------------------------- Congradulations for this issue that I read and was so intersting
and instructive.I also was impressed reading the articles of the
two months before. Koutsonikas Antonis ------------------------------------- thank you for the ezine.could you tell me how to subscribe to the
book version ...as i enjoy having a read. ------------------------------------- dear dr bhatia --------------------------------------------------- Thank you for the information. I am working in a HIV case, and I want to send the information. But my natural language is Spanish, and so I have to translate it. I will send it as soon as possible, because I think is very important to make available to others colleages, about the possibilities for people with HIV+ in homeopathy. Thanks again. Elizabeth Aguilar ----------------------------------------------------- Hello, In response to your request for feedback on this issue, I did enjoy reading it however realized that the practitioners using this system seem to rely on polycrests or remedies highly represented in the Repertory - and those remedies that are "ascribed" as belonging to a particular miasm. Therefore this leaves out hundreds if not thousands of lesser-known, newer or small remedies which in my practise, are used regularly. While the idea of facial analysis is intriguing, it seems far too limiting to actually find the similimum that way. Susan Drury ---------------------------------------- Dear Sir, Dr. Rasik Mohan Patnaik ---------------------------------------- dear sir, ---------------------------------------- Dear Dr. Manish, ---------------------------------------- thanks , this months contents r mind blowing containg information
of highest range and worth reading ---------------------------------------- Hello Manish, Thank you very much for airing this situation and proposing to
take constructive action. I am a mature student, and was very dismayed
when I encountered this behavior in my online study hall. I agree,
this is prevalent in all walks of society, but I feel that in the
healing arts, we must do better than everyone else if we are truly
to call ourselves Does it not seem to you that the present divide between differing approaches to hpathy can only be judged based upon results? If a certain method works as well as the other, then why not use it? Does it not seem that certain types of hpaths will gravitate towards one system more than another because it is more inductive or more intuitive, depending on the practitioner's own nature? In the end, it is the backbiting and infighting and contentions between us that will weaken homeopathy and make it vulnerable to dismissal as ' quack' medicine. If we all work together to share results and build a better science, we can help homeopathy thrive. I believe that were Hahnemann given 200 more years to live, he may have come up with similar ideas to some of our new generation of homeopaths. He was a very spiritual and intuitive man, and a perfect scientist. In the end, the adoption of one method over another will only be borne out by rigorous observance of actual clinical results. I believe this is what we should strive for as a community. Della Heywood ---------------------------------------- Dear Sir, All your issues are indeed splendid.Please continue your
work and keep growing. ---------------------------------------- Dear Sir, Delighted as I am to receive the current issue, nevertheless I would appreciate if I could receive the issues before the month of March '07. The last one that I had received was in July 2006. Thanking you once again, ---------------------------------------- HELLO MY ALL DEAR HOMOEOPATHS.,AND TEAM OF HPATHY., ---------------------------------------- Dear Editor thanks for your consideration Ian Townsend ---------------------------------------- I am one of those fools that is blessed with soft teeth that get
infected all by themselves, and I had been noticing that the antibiotics
were not really working any more. My dentist is very good; I have
never gotten an infection from her office. But she is now just wanting
to pull teath. I don't want to be a toothless wonder by the time
I'm 35. These three articles on tooth aches are a great resource
of things to try before calling my dentist. Thanks a bunch! ---------------------------------------- I have read all your articles,these are very good & informative.I have also cured so many cases and shared it with you later on & keep in touch with you.GOOD BYE & TAKE CARE OF YOU. Dr.A.S.THIND ---------------------------------------- Dear Manish, ---------------------------------------- Sir, i have gone through your March issue it is very nice collections.
kindly add articles of Dr Vijay Praffulkars and Dr Anita Salunkhe
an emminent classic homoeopaths ---------------------------------------- I have gone through all the articles of the said issue.I could
not retrain my-self to appriciate the following articles esp. ---------------------------------------- THANK YOU ALL FOR YOUR FEEDBACK Send us your feedback, views, comments and suggestions
about various articles published in Homeopathy 4 Everyone
and Hpathy.com in general to Dr. B at editor@hpathy.com.
Your feedback is very important to us! |
|||
|
