 |
|
|||||||||||
|
||||||||||||
Forums
Courses
Shop
Diseases
Articles
Journal
Directory| |
|||
Feedback - Homeopathy 4 Everyone |
|||
| Hpathy Ezine - July, 2007 | |||
Send us your feedback, views, comments and suggestions about various articles published in Homeopathy 4 Everyone and Hpathy.com in general at editor@hpathy.com. Your feedback is very important to us! |
|||
|
I am so grateful to David Little for devoting so much time and effort into his beautifully written and argued article in this issue. I have been in crisis, troubled by the new approaches that do not attract me but left me wondering whether I was being a fuddy-duddy and failing to do the best for my patients. The article is so lucid, clear and convincing that I can confidently go back to basics and to practicing the way I love. (He is so right that we don't study the originals enough and rely on what our teachers tell us!) Thank you so much for an incontrovertible exposition of the fundamentals
of Homeopathy consists. ---------------------------------------- When I read D.Little I often think I am reading JW. This ought to be in a pamphlet form. ---------------------------------------- Hello, I have no suggestions, however I’d like to know, in your country (or personally), how do you give the K potencies. Here in Belgium we have little information. Some give a 200 K and let it work for 3 years. I can’t believe in that. I use to give 10 “granules” ( I don’t know the name in English) for a dose because it’s cheaper. Recently I tried Phos-ac 10M K, 50M K and CM K at 10 days interval, just to see if there was any aggravation or even improvement. Just improvement succeeded as this remedy is my similimum. So I’d like to know the frequency to give K and if it’s equal to give 10 “granules” (the ones you give for 30 K) for a dose. Kent repeated high potencies at 6 hour interval, so I apply the same principal but with ascending potencies. Thank you in advance, Serge Sortino ---------------------------------------- Tips and Secrets are invaluable. They're easy to memorize. I already see that I'm using them in my clinical practice. Thank you. Dr. Ellen Feingold, M.D. ---------------------------------------- Dear Dr B I was very disappointed not to see another of your excellent talks on the Aphorisms of the Organon. The first thing that I looked for was your contribution. More please!! Excellent article as always by David Little Regards Kerry ---------------------------------------- Article on gastritis What a wonderful informative article! Thankyou so much for taking
the time to write this, I found it to be extremely clear and very
helpful in understanding the many considerations when treating gastritis. ---------------------------------------- I have observed electrodermal testing for many years. I believe
that in the hands of a knowledgeable and honest practitioner it
can be a help in running a homeopathy practice. Electrodermal testing,
however, is not homeopathy, and should not be presented as homeopathy
to the public. ---------------------------------------------- I am afraid mrs.Fuller is a bit confused in this matter. Best regards, ------------------------------------- Disappointment ------------------------------------- David Little is the one that have fully understood how the work
of the predecesors can be continued and improved without changing
anything at the level of principles. ------------------------------------- Thank you for another great ezine! ------------------------------------- Welte article june 07 ------------------------------------- I so loving reading articles by Julian - his precision and readability
is always superb. Please keep running his articles whenever you
can...actually why not make a history segment in the journal? I'm
sure few of us know enough history! ------------------------------------- I read most of the ezine each month. I enjoy mostly the articles
that hilight a remedy and talk about it, especially the newer remedies
that are not in the older MMs. I don't have anyone to talk to about
Homeopathy. I don't have access to that info, not having the more
expensive books and computer programs,( sigh) so that is of most
interest to me. I feel like I have missed so much. But the prices
of the new books are prohibitive so I depend on you for this new
info. I enjoyed the article about Scholtens theories the most and
it prompted me to take down my book and take some notes in it. I
got alot from that review. I also enjoyed the tips and the info
on gastritis, it was well done, encompassing all parts of the treatment.
I skim the ones by David Little, but I find him so far beyond my
level that I just don't get much out of it. All in all without this
I would have no contact with the Homeopathic world. I had to cancel
all of my magazines and even my membership in NCH. Of late we are
living on disability and just making it, we have all we need but
since I don't practice, my need for this info gets swept away into
more immediate necessities. Maybe I will go back to work someday
and then I will have the means to get back into the swing of things;
get all the magazines again. Right now, you are IT for me and without
you, I would have no other stimulation. Please know that I really
appreciate all the articles and all the information that is available
here. Keep up the good work. ------------------------------------- Curare ------------------------------------- I fully agree with the excellent article of D.Little as I think
there are now interesting developments, but great care should be
taken to teach the new methods to students before they have fully
acquired the basis of classical homeopathy. I begged tfrom him he
permission to quote some extracts of his article, if the book I
am writing in french on the new visage of homeopathy will be published.
He agreed. ------------------------------------- I took David Little's course some years ago and it made basic
principles clear ( as does Dr. Luc's work ). The article on Classical
Homeopathy should be a must read for students, and unfortunately
for many practitioners. Sensitivity matters, modalities must be
considered, and above all the individual essence has to be appreciated.
Listen to the patient, don't make up your mind too quickly and do
the necessary consultation of materia medica and the repertory.
------------------------------------- As a retired Homeopath of 35 years I have alot to say about Homeopathy...some
good somebad ....Bad first...Leadership is a joke I called it Cement
without a form hard but a big mess that is hard to rectify later....and
we keep building on this bad leadership over and over again...Leadership
has let us down not Homeopathy....as far as the different approaches
big deal you keep trying to find the right remedy until you get
the desired results....the patient tells us both the remedy and
potency period. ------------------------------------- Another wonderful article by David Little. I am studying Homoeopathy at an undergraduate degree level in Australia. I love the course and the tutors but unlike David's talk on Classical Homoeopathy we do not study Hahnemann's Chronic Diseases or his Lesser writings and I wonder whether we can call ourselves classically trained without studying such classics. Instead we study the works of Sankaran, Scholten & Vithoulkas; all wonderful homoeopaths, but without the grounding in the classical teachings I wonder whether our depth of knowledge allows insight into these other teachers. Thanks David for keeping to fly the classical teachings of the
master himself. ------------------------------------- Just two words for David Little’s article: Many thanks, --------------------------------------------------- Recibí con mucho agrado su artículo del Dr. Little.
Me pareció muy interesante e ilustrativo y completísimo.
Me he curado de algunas dolencias exclusivamente con homeopatía;
y como decía Hanneman: Potencias LM (en la mayoría
de los casos), en agua, medicamento único. Siempre agitando
el remedio. Of course I completely agree with David Little as I have followed
for many years exactly the same course as one can see in my published
books. The danger of these new methods in my opinion is even greater
as I see schools now who only teach Sankaran and Scholten: they
don't even know how to use a repertory! And some tell me proudly
how they received this "unproven" (sic) remedy ad got
so much better! Such actions will only destroy homeopathy as Hering
has warned us before. The management part cannot be enough stressed.
I receive too many patients who have been to ten homeopaths without
any result. In general the education of homeopathy is mediocre worldwide
and bad in many parts. And it is not only the beginners who don't
recognize a Calc-c when there is one in front of them (see my conversation
with Elaine Lewis April issue). I am not optimistic regarding homeopathy's
future, there are enough people out there catering to optimistic
forecasts. I do hope I am wrong in this but money plays too big
a role in this issue. Even in China, as patients, when they have
money they abandon their TCM and rather pay money for allopathic
intervention since that looks prestigious and a sign that they made
it in life. And this is no better in India. And in the modern world,
the power of modern medicine (politics ands money) will always suffocate
the true healing art of Homeopathy but that will never stop me from
swimming upstreams.I rather be the individual than be part of the
masses who act like everyone act or do what the masses expect them
to do. ----------------------------------------------------- Reading this article that David Little wrote is in line with my
thoughts about homeopathy. I have graduated from my course 18 months
ago and during my time I have studied many facets of Homeopathy
from the old to the new. I tried to use the new methods and I felt
that I didn't have the fall back of the extensive experience of
traditional methods in case taking and prescribing. I couldn't get
a clear picture of the patient from using for example Sankaran or
Scholtens' method. Although these methods look progressive, and
they are, if you don't have the clinical and theoretical knowledge
of the backbone fundamentals of homeopathy this will invariably
be a short coming in practice. ---------------------------------------- I read David Little’s article with interest, and would like to raise only a couple of points with him since the length of the article precludes an equally lengthy reply. But as he says ‘I have taken the time to write this rather lengthy discourse because I really care about Homoeopathy’, so do I and would therefore like to reply from a ‘post-modern’ or ‘neoclassical’ perspective. (see my article Homeopathy & Multiple Skills by C.J.Wansbrough published Homeopathic Links Volume17, Summer 2004 or website www.biolumanetics.net/tantalus) My approach to homeopathy has always been empirical but I have spent time in research. David Little states and I quote him, ‘Every established classical system is associated with certain maxims that express its core values. The four cardinal aphorisms of traditional Homoeopathy are Similars Cure Similars, the single remedy, the minimum dose and the application of the potentized remedy. These cardinal principles are then applied a number of ways that can be tailored to suit a wide variety of clinical situations.’ I have no trouble or arguments with these maxims, they are strictly speaking the essential core of homeopathic practice. But I have no need to apply or even value Hahnemann’s perspective on how energy medicine works , we have quantum theory and physics for this. I personally apply the principle of similars by assuming it to be a number of frequencies the closer it is the more effective the medicine will be and surely this works solely on the principle of resonance (physics pure and simple),and I do not need to access except for purely historical reasons Samuel’s own views on this principle. My own research using Potentised Sound , remedies which I made some 7 years ago and have led me to experiment with the effects of potentised sound leads to the simple conclusion that remedies represent complex frequencies and the closer the match to the individual the faster the effects of the remedy on that individual. In other words individuals vary in terms of their band width (like broad band and narrow band on the internet) and some individuals have a narrow band of engagement and therefore need precise remedies, others have a broader band and therefore polycrests will work well on such individuals. Single or complex remedies make little difference because the action of the remedy still acts as a single remedy as the wave forms of the complex remedy just create a new remedy, this has been observed using again single sonic remedies and combining in various ways. The minimum dose just represents just enough of the correct resonance for that remedy to act on that individual. The point I am making is that I do not need to value except for historical reasons Hahnemann’s complex views on how the vital force works etc they can be superseded very simply by physics. The other aspect about his article is his discussion of the various methods of finding the remedy which is only covered by his first cardinal aphorism. Similar Cures similar ! This aspect or perspective ultimately involves the study of hermeneutics which can be quoted from the Wikipedia (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hermeneutics) as denoting the study of theories and methods of the interpretation of all texts and systems of meaning. In other words the investigation and interpretation of a diseased state is an extraordinary complex multi-textual exercise which can be taken from a multitude of perspectives. Yet the reason why I care about homeopathy is that all such interpretations must still be judged by the criteria of effectiveness and speed of action and recovery. So there are ethical criteria by which you can judge a good or bad prescription and these empirical criteria are first and foremost how I judge the effects of a remedy. The closer the frequency match to the diseased individual the better the speed of recovery of that individual (I think as homeopaths we can all agree on this maxim ) which again entails only one approach to homeopathy !! finding the simillimum. In searching for this we have little option except to use the kingdom approach and this is not because it is fashionable but surely the only way to access the overwhelming amount of material which one has to play with if one wishes to find that frequency. It is an exercise and I quote from my article mentioned above In this endless search for the best remedy we are now overwhelmed
with the rapidly increasing pace of information which can be accessed
at our fingertips through the internet. It is in processing information that we now need to study how to practice homeopathy which why I had no option except to pursue ‘The Kingdom Approach’ or why I have called that approach the ‘Neoclassical approach’ it was this or complete insanity!! I would also like to make one further point because David Little obviously has a profound grasp of Samuel Hahnemann’s writings and other historical figures, I again do not have any problems studying them for historical purposes but we live in the 21 Century and so we must change and evolve with the present ‘zeitgeist’. This brings me to my final point in studying Hahnemann, we have inherited an enormous amount of baggage from his time especially the theory of miasms to which David refers to on many occasions but do we need them!!! Samuel Hahnemann had and prescribed sixty remedies when they did
not work he used miasmatic theory, the Neoclassical homeopaths do
not seem to refer very much to miasmatic prescribing and in my own
practice a remedy is a frequency, that remedy works why do we even
need miasmatic theory !!! ---------------------------------------- I found David Littles discourse thought provoking and informative.
I can only concur with regard to the one sided dichotomies and the
abandonmet of some to any concrete structure. It seems sometimes
the Emperors new clothes must be worn to be accepted as worthy of
the title Homeopath?? Thank you for this well thought out, humbly written article by David Little. As a professional homeopath I deeply appreciate and agree with his viewpoint. I believe that the key to the "crisis" he is addressing lies in the phrase he uses several times: Well-trained homeopath. I also believe that the key to the "crisis" he is addressing lies in his attitude: Humble. Well trained homeopaths seem to be somewhat hard to come by these days. In my quest to become the practitioner that I believed I could and should be in order to fully embody all that homeopathy has to offer I attended 3 schools and was a, sometimes the, top ranked student. I share the level at which I was assessed so that it will be understood that I didn't attend 3 schools due to a lack of ability but rather in a quest to be a truly effective homeopath. At my first school, under the brilliant tutelage of Misha Norland, I received the classical foundation that is the bedrock of my practice to this day. However I didn't feel that I quite had the knowledge that I needed to fully bring forth all that I knew homeopathy promised. I was getting average results which did not live up to my idea of the potential of homeopathy. I view this as my lack, not a lack in this training. At the same time I watched in dismay as friends and relatives who had been patients of very popular homeopaths for many years were being diagnosed with serious cancers, heart disease,, etc. while still using homeopathy and AFTER years of active treatment. Surely something was amiss in the world of homeopathy. At the second school I attended, an advanced study course, taught by a leading homeopath, I received a good basic review and learned what arrogance can lead to in prescribing. I was surprised by the number of fellow students who had, like myself, graduated from basic homeopathy trainings and yet, fortunately unlike myself, were learning some of the basics for the very first time. The third school I attended, a small new school, gave me the access to the "tricks of the trade" I had been seeking - hormone balancing, cancer prevention and treatment, addiction withdrawal protocols, etc. I attended this school as a regular student, with students that were new and receiving their first and possibly only homeopathic training. While extremely helpful to me, given my background, I was aghast at the lack of classical training offered. The Organon was never spoken of. Law of Cure, all of the foundational knowledge of homeopathy was given short shrift compared to the "sexy" and exciting new ideas of our time, as presented by Scholten, Sankaran, etc. Never was it explained that these techniques are possible tools, to be used when and if needed by a practitioner who already has a solid ground in homeopathic principles. It is my hope that we in the homeopathy community will not lose ourselves, as can so easily happen in these times, to the glitter and seductiveness of fame and shortcuts. While I have great respect for the new insights being brought forth during this time they, like all things, are a double-edged sword. These newer methods may be used appropriately to further the effectiveness of homeopathy and deepen our ability to assist is the removal of humanity's suffering. Or, they may be used as shortcuts and student/client attractors which may make us money and appear to empower us in the short term but which will ultimately undermine the popular perception and the effectiveness of our profession. Thank you for you time and for your work for the betterment of homeopathy. ELD ------------------------------------------------- I cannot think of a better teacher (than David Little) of homeopathy
who treads carefully, Hafeez ---------------------------------------- I have read the David Little article, which is according to Hahnemann In the States the Original Organon is now a museum piece, not a practical manual, a lot of the valuable books have been ditched. Let's hear a more vociferous applause for what David Little is
bringing or is the applause so muted because there is little enthusiasm
for it? Mel Montgomery ---------------------------------------- I enjoyed the interview very much, although I tried the link and
it took me to a German site which is not helpful as I do not read
this language. The other article was also interesting but difficult
to follow at times due to it's abbreviated nature and the appearance
that English is not the writer's first language. With best regards Sincerely yours ---------------------------------------- Thank you so much for interviewing Ulrich Welte. It is, to date,the
best article I have read in your ezine. I have recently purchased his Handwriting book - and have just begun to use it as well. Very exciting stuff!! Pat Deacon, RSHom,HMC ---------------------------------------- Dear Dr. Manish – Namasste: I hope that this will find you in the best of health and cheers. I feel myself proud to be associated with you and I am always thankful to you for giving me an apportunity to read the best articles of the best authors from time to time. As desired by you, I wish to comment regarding Dr. David Little’s article “Crisis in Classical and Contemporary Thought” as under: I have greatest regards for Dr David Little, who is genious in the field of homoeopathy packed with the most valuable knowledge in greatest depth. I learn many things from his various other articles too which are the pillars of true Hahnemanian’s homoeopathy. God bless Dr. David Little for providing his articles and sharing his experience and knowledge which shows us the right path in the right direction and Dr. David Little is the true follower of the Father of Homoeopathy, Dr. Samuel Hahnemann. I pray to God for his long, healthy and prosperous life. Like Dr David Little only few people come to this world to help others with their experience and knowledge. His abovementioned article is the best and the true lover of homoeopathy should follow his advice and take the full advantage of his great knowledge. With best regards Sincerely yours ---------------------------------------- Dear Sir: Every single word of what Dr. Little says is true as far as my experience goes. I am a homeopathic enthusiast and been practising on a limited scale for family and friends and others who believe in it. I do not do it for money. I have had some very spectacular successes in treating the following with minimal doses of homeopathic remedies: 1. Hypertension. A case where the patient was being advised for
replacement of heart! I have acheived all the above with the minium dose of the remedy in question and used 200 C potency in most of the cases. I have found it more difficult to treat successfully the day to day colds etc. Sincerely, Gopal Pandey Dear Editor and David Little Cordial greetings!! I just jave read David' s article, congratulations to both of you!! It is a masterpiece for everyone involved in Homeopathy.. Thanks a lot!! All the best ---------------------------------------- hello........... Today i go through the Artical - "Crisis in classical and contemporary thought by Davil Little", and am getting inexpressible delight. It's really UP TO THE MARK. I'm agree with his thought. With expectation like this,
---------------------------------------- I have gone through the interview of UW. In my opinion this is not a big contribution to Homoeopathy. Color therapy is used in Naturecure methods since centuries. One of its kind is GEM THERAPY, in which the gems are used for preparation of medicine and therapeutics. There are so many Phototherapist, who treat the patient by using colors and in colorways, in which they find themselves experts. UW have not mentioned his failures in treating patients. He always accepting the cure side and not the falure side. In my opinion failure side will be much more. I have found that most of the Homoeopathic practitioners are going away from teachings of Hahnemann. These practitioners posing themselves that they have discovered such a foolproof way, which will, if, adopted revolutionise the Homoeopathy. On Globle level, scientific comunity laughs on us, I mean here "we Homoeopaths", claiming this type of discovery which have no scientific evidence and base to proove its efficiency, which require strict and controlled observations. Unless and until, we Homoeopaths, will not able to show the discovery
or discoveries competentively on very strict scientific observations
properly conducted by the team of experts of different fields, there
is no place for such discoveries. ---------------------------------------- Dear Editor, Just some brief feedback to congratulate you on your papers in
the July issue of Hpathy4Everyone Ezine. Thankyou for these very nice thought provoking articles. Robert Bannan LCH LCCH (USA) --------------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------- We have to realize that homeopathy, as practiced by Samuel Hahnemann, and like all other forms of clinical therapeutic treatment, is subject to evolution, change, and advancement. As more information becomes available, we must remain open to new developments from current and future researchers and young practitioners. If not, we will remain stagnant and no progress will be made. There is no mandate that a classical practitioner has to change from his or her method of practice just because new philosophies are proposed. Nevertheless, in the same way that progress in surgery has been made since the pioneering, innovative work of John Hunter, who lived from 1728 to 1793 in England, to the present state of the art of surgery, we have to move forward and take into account the new ideas of those homeopathic practitioners outside the classical model. Do not make the mistake of closing the door to progress or new
thought in homeopathy, or the profession will lose many of the young,
up and coming researchers and practitioners. We should continue
to encourage classical homeopathic education that those entering
the profession can have an understanding of the principles of homeopathy.
George King ---------------------------------------- I found Mr. Little's article thoughtful and measured. I am one
of the core teachers at Pacific Academy in San Francisco, and have
for te last 10 years struggled to help students make sense of Sankaran's
and Scholten's ideas. They are fascinating and bewitching to many
students because they offer seemingly facile new methods to simplify
case analysis. And many students who have embraced Sankaran's methods
seem to have a fanatical loyalty and rigidity to this method which
cuts them off from a wider, thoughtful and holistic approach to
understanding cases. I appreciate Mr. Little's balance in presenting
his ideas about the new methods, and his presentation of the roots
of these methods in Hahnemann's ideas. I will ask my students to
read his article. Yours, Iris Ratowsky This is well known fact that Hahnemann was the first physician, who , while arranging symptomatology of Materia Medica, begins from MIND. At his period, symptomatology was started from Head and no mention of mind symptoms alone. It is the brilliant mind of Dr Hahnemann that he collected mental symptoms as a prime feature and placed in his materia medica the first place. It was a revolutionary step at his time. How much time before Psychiatry practice have developed ? Fraud was the first person who systematically analysed the Psychic anomalies. After that much have been done and experimented on Phyco related science. Modern Western Medicine catagorieses illness in two sections. 1- Somatopsyhic and 2- Psycosomatic. Psychiatry deals with these two. Much can not be said, what Dr. DP have observed in the cancer cases.
However his claim for treating such patients should not be denied.
If it is true, this should be seen and observed in other patients,
round about one hundred. ---------------------------------------- I believe that the discussions that you have stimulated have made
a very positive contribution to broadening the scope of thought
of many homoeopaths, and especially have given students and new
practitioners added perspectives that they may not have received
if educated by people with limited ideas about the development of
classical homoeopathy, or the use of particular systems at the expense
of a true Hahnemannian approach ---------------------------------------- its really excellent issue. iam very much thankful to u for sending the articles monthly lournals.it
is very much help ful by which even with little knowledge in homoeopathy
we could be able to cure small ailments.perticularly in rural areas.all
the credits to you also.the homoeopathy tips n secrets too helpful
n very handy.its very infomative n very much use ful for immediate
attending the acute cases.even some times chronic cases.iam very
much thankful to u once again. -------------------------------------------- Feedback - gastritis Dear editor, this article is excellent.The background I was disappointed to note however that no mention was made in this article of Nat Phos which is my default remedy for patients presenting with Gastric problems, especially those who present with problems with digestion, including Heartburn, Puffiness after meals etc. I prescribe Nat Phos 6x dose 2-4 tablets taken immediately after
a meal and the results have been very positive. I also use some
of the remedies that are listed in this article to be taken with
the NP and for patients who present with You may like to consider my therapy for your patients as I have had many patients who have been cured of their chronic gastric problems, some of whom had consulted many specialists in the medical sector who have only prescribed the standard drugs listed in your article, all of which only are palliatives but do not cure the patient. I note that you can send similar articles every third day and I would welcome them as they are very useful and I hope that others too will comment as I have done above on them as we can then all share with each other, our experience in the treatment of various human ailments. Kind Regards Joe De Livera
So , yes, please send me more articles like this! Very helpful. Greetings, Lewis Bernaldo de Quiros. --------------------------------------------- I'm sendig you my feadback about your article on gastritis, It is very interesting I find that lot of work have been done on this subject. Has a nurse and homeopath it is a good way to start the day before de clients guet in the office. Micheline Babin h.d. ---------------------------------------- The article is very nice covering various aspects of the disease
along with the homeopathic therapeutics. I really appreciate all
the hard work that u are doing through this web site. I am interested
in receiving articles that will give a gist of the pathology along
with the theraupitic outlook. Thank you for sending the articles
in advance & Good Luck to all the Hpathy team to bring out such
nice articles in future. This is a very nice online guidance for
practitioners of all categories. =----------------------------------------- The articles on any specific problem detailing out the symptoms
and the treatment are always very useful. I would urge you to pick
up some chronic problems nagging large population across the globe
(like irritable bowl syndrome, atopic dermatitis, psoriasis, leucoderma,
chronic fatigue syndrome etc.) and enlighten the homeo practising
fraternity with the treatment methodologies. ----------------------------------------------- I thought this article was excellent! I especially appreciated
the depth of detail of both diagnosis and conventional treatment
as well as the Homeopathic theraputics, which are so helpful for
treating acutes. ---------------------------------------- I read Gastritis article completely. It is a very good article in which gastritis explained in detailed and give all information. Thank you so much for sends me this and other articles. These articles are increased my knowledge. But plz sends me an article about breast tumor and cancer, its causes, general management, conventional treatment and homeopathic therapeutics? Thank you Maryum Shakil ---------------------------------------- Thank you. I did read and appreciate this article. I also very
much like your tips sections. Still I have too much information
to read daily so I'm interested in having one good thing a week,
perhaps including an article like the one on gastritis. Every three
days sounds too time consuming to me. ---------------------------------------- Thank u 4 a good article on gastrities. The suggested medicines
are very relevant. Many of the citizens in India suffer from gastrities
in some form or other mainly due to their lifestyles --------------------------------------------- Hello, I'm Dra Mercedes from Brasil , the article "gastritis" make me happy, becose I have many pacients wich gastrits, thanks so much I like to receive more such articles like this thank ------------------------------------- Thanks for emailing the article on gastritis. ------------------------------------------------------------ ------- Thank you for this article and for other information-packed messages
you have sent me. I do find them useful. ---------------------------------------- Gastritis, ---------------------------------------- Thoroughly enjoyed your site... questions, answers and other informative
issues. ---------------------------------------- Thanks for publishing the article on gastritis.The information
given here are very useful.I would like to say a few words.Iris
versicolor is also used in gastritis.The leading symptoms are:-
Heartburn and eructations with a feeling like sea-sickness,nausea
and dull,frontal headache,with much burning along he whole alimentary
tract, profuse secretions from salivary,pancreatic and intestinal
glands. Dr. R.K.Saha -------------------------------------------- THANK YOU ALL FOR YOUR FEEDBACK Send us your feedback, views, comments and suggestions
about various articles published in Homeopathy 4 Everyone
and Hpathy.com in general to Dr. B at editor@hpathy.com.
Your feedback is very important to us! |
|||
|
