What is Vital Force

I think you folks had misunderstood AlexS. Insinuating insults and calling names won't help your cause either.

We cannot say what exactly the vital force is! To me It looks like immune system.The time will prove.  sajjad.

Alex wrote:
You are right !

I think they have no proper background to discuss such things .

Chiongguo,
Here you have an example.
I have 45 years in the business and poor Alex has a bad experience with homoeopathy.

Yet he thinks he is qualified and we don't have the background.
Now that is simply hubris.

I alsways quote the authorities in homoeopathy and the relevant research on allopathy, yet Alex of course knows better. And never quotes, but those who are opposed to homoeopathy. We misunderstand him? I think the misunderstanding is with you, I am afraid to say.

You have but 9 posts in so many years as a member. That shows me you are not an active participant. Yet you want to pontificate on Alex being misunderstood and accuse us of insults.
Give me an example.
Alex is the insulting one, plain and simple. He insults everyone's intelligence to start with.

Regards,
Kaviraj.

Well fist of all, Sajjad, the definitions i gave were clear enough in the distinctions i made between the soul and the defence mechanism. So we do know what the term "vital force" means from years of observation and confirmation.

The simple terms Alex is talking about have therefore already been defined. His question is, as usual, redundant.

Regards,
Kaviraj.

Dear kaviraj,

Alex is not alone.All the skeptics wants us to show the vital force in a plate.The have only 2-3 questions.Never more than that.

Dear Sajjad,

mild is not the term i use for him. You are entitled to your idea about him, but mine is entirely different, if his posts are anything to go by. As the saying goes, actions speak louder than words.
There is nothing wrong with being sceptical - my own definition of the terms for the vital force is a case in point. A sceptic, when he uses his brains and is open to scientific explanations, will adjust his judgement.
Complete detraction of the homoeopathc method by insulting us with terms like schizoids is quite another matter. A shallow critic will resort to denial - which is more than that famous river in Egypt - and slanderous remarks through lack of proper argument. He will remain in his preconceived and prejudiced state of mind regardless all the good advise he gets.
It would be interesting to collect and collate all the threads he has started, just so he can excercise his inane hairsplitting arguments. At first i had the idea he really wanted to know. Soon, by his own actions, he has shown everyone but a few that he just likes to argue and be insulting. That is hardly mild or innocent.
It is about time we expose him loud and clear for what he is. As you may have noticed, he is silent about my comments, because he knows that i will shoot down his less than intelligent arguments as spurious and unscientific, regardless his claims to their "scientific" nature.

Regards,
Kaviraj.

Originally posted by sajjadakram [This is "damaging". sajjad.

Read Margaret Tyler , about her damaging practices .

Originally posted by AlexS Originally posted by sajjadakram [This is "damaging". sajjad.   Read Margaret Tyler , about her damaging practices .

Please quote some references.It is difficult for me to locate.

Originally posted by sajjadakram Please quote some references.It is difficult for me to locate. sajjad.

I can only quote a Russian translation ...