I will say that both Kaviraj and David have brought something special into the Hpathy forums. We have learnt a lot from both of them.
I admit, that previously, I had not much idea of Sankaran's methods and was rather critical of them in my mind, because of hearing negative reports about his method of case taking, etc. However, after reading David's cases and reading his posts, it is clear to me that there must be SOMETHING MORE to Sankaran's methods, something real, that can be put to good use in finding a remedy for our patients. I am ready to be open-minded about it and read more and learn more. Whether I eventually use it in my practice, I don't know, but maybe!
People like Mario, Avril are also using these methods and I have great respect for their knowledge and dedication to homoeopathy. If they find this method useful, there must be something in it!
Kaviraj has lots of experience and very sound knowledge. He gives of his knowledge and experience willingly!
Maybe Kaviraj's idea of how homoeopathy should be practised does not agree with David's, but that does not mean that we can't learn from them both.
What we need is for both of them to keep posting, even enter into discussions and lively debate, but let that debate not degenerate into personal attacks. David has always been polite towards Kaviraj, even whilst defending himself, but unfortunately, Kaviraj's temperament does not allow diplomacy.
Hence, if we are to accept Kaviraj's posts the way they are, Kaviraj should also accept others' posts the way they are, and he should also accept that we do our task of moderation including the editing of his posts, from time to time!

Let us not fight battles here, but enter into lively discussions; after all this is a learning ground!