SuperFlu, Agrohomeo, and other with Dr.Kaviraj

Okay, I'm back.  Sorry about that.  You know goats! 

Re:  super secret homeopathy stuff.

"ORCON" classified -- meaning for any government twits reading this:   I generated it.  I invented it.  I'll declassify whatever the hell I see fit on it when and where I see fit unless contractually obligated not to.

As for the American government version of homeopathy against Super Flu, I honestly do not know the full depths of it and seriousness at the top (if any).   I can tell you there has been serious R&D into homeopathy via DoD and contractors.  http://excalibur.110mb.com/dod.htm.

It seems to be receiving a warm welcome among small circles of allopaths and Integrative Medicine people within DoD who know better and are trying.  I object, however, to the repainting of it in allopathic conehead form as "microdose" and "ultradilute" drivel.   They neglect to credit Hahnemann or study the full depths of our art, and judge it in allopathic light, and so therefore are incompetent to make any national security determination with eggheads like that in administrative oversight.   

For my part, all I can do is keep grumbling as a vulgar professor duck, make trouble and make them jittery here and there, and so at least the good generals and other agency dweebs are forced to give it a continual second look.  The function of my cartoon duck is to stand out here like a mad prophet continually screaming: "To hell with you all!!  Poopy!!! Poopy!!! Poopy!!!  Poopy on you all, Pentagon!!!  You Washington D.C. pssies!!!!  G-damn incompetent eggheads!!!  No good loafers on the tax dole!!!!!  Wake up!!!!!  Bah, what the hell do I care!  Fine then.   You go die off.  Yes, let the people and these vile city slickers rot in hell.  F it all!!!  You're all gonna die!  Good!!!  I don't like Washington and Pentagon pukes anyhow.  Let them burn."   And, where the generals drop the ball, they get nervous because they know the vision is spread in other places -- Congress, Senate, various agencies, the public, foreign nations.  People are going to want to know why they dropped the ball when the cities are dying off someday. 

But, have they dropped the ball?   Do they work on my stuff?  Do they pursue better things in the darkest of corners?   I honestly don't know.   I don't think so.  If you gamble on anything, it is always best to presume Washington filled with no good cowards and treasonous scum.  And, if they do pursue it, you can bet they'll do so in secret because that's strategically required in evading allopathic conspiracies.  And, if I do now or later ever know what's going on, probably I'll be contracted to lie to you about it anyhow.  Sorry!

But, I can promise you that whatever you say here regarding the treatment of epidemics, there is a technical intelligence spy out there somewhere in America who is paid to read and digest it all.  There are enemy nations who read it and actually subscribe to my blog more so than my own country or your England.  And, I have no idea what your England is doing about it....but you might want to inform your future king about it sometime.  Maybe he can help out?   Have him talk to these Washington eggheads and have his sharper people teach Pentagon dipsts properly about homeopathy?  After all, when his England is dying from germ warfare someday soon, U.K.'s strategic position in the world won't be much served when over half the U.S. is down, disabled, and dying off in potentially just one week.

Questions for you:

Plenty, but most that we should probably not go over in the open or even at all.  Heck, bill these twits for access to our thoughts!   I'm in no hurry to save the world or keep cities alive.  Poopy on that!    They'll have to figure out the mass production engineering on their own.

Prescribing and posology-wise, we often think of plagues in terms of natural epidemics.  Malaria, etc.   There are the more man-made weapons strains which can resemble AIDS, for example.   I do not know if  AIDS was  engineered and unleashed in the world as some conspiracy folks claim, but I do know -- with a fair degree of certainty based in credible testimony of insiders with Big Pharma -- that allopathy was able to cure it long ago.  They chose not to in favor of a commercially more lucrative treatment drug and course. 

....The more insidious virii.  The dormant ones.  The ones that can sneak in on us like a mild case of the flu and then amplify -- especially when merged in conjunction with another -- these are emerging biological warfare threats the nations face.  I'm talking about a widespread Trojan Horse insertion under Strategic Biological Warfare (SBW) ops followed up by a more massive Activation Virus.   It would take ample genetic and bio engineering, but is certainly possible on a Third World budget.  Like that, you can unleash controlled Biological Warfare in the world -- so as to target key populations, demographics, etc. -- without endangering your own people among the covert spread.  And we sit pretty much with our pants down and bent over for that as First Worlders who are always trying to enslave the Third World's cows.  One day, they'll deck us pretty badly and really only homeopathy can save the day, in my view.   The more Allopathy conspires against us...that's cool....we'll just live while the oligarchs die off.   So, what the hell do I care if Washington does or doesn't do anything on it?   I only care when paid to care these days!   And that's just for giving those pukes the time of day.  Politeness costs double.  Caring I can't bill them on fairly because I honestly don't anymore.   But, now and then, I get bored and have an itch to don my Super Man costume once more.  That about sums it up here.

Anyhow, so, from my view, the potential types of virii we may have to engage could come in any form of rubrics.   At first, they'll probably seem fairly benign.  Immediate homeopathic action against them would help, but I think -- as a second strain is unleashed or the engineered virii moves differently when attacked by the body -- the initial cases could be confusing to us.  It may seem like aggravation or proving to us when we forget that it may be an engineered issue.  And, for that reason, I tend to appreciate the blood nosode all the more.  It may be Mixopathy, but I have seen it work wonders against these toxic metals in the blood.  For example:  A case of Mercury worked against with blood autonosode.

...Well, for now, no specific questions.  Just wondering what input you have on all that when considering things from this more obscure, engineered viral perspective rather than the natural epidemics you've engaged.

Thank you!

Stan

Circular Reasoning by Bungling Bishops
We are in a hole in time, which is the cavern of modern medicine. Walls that are dogmas, from which drips ancient wisdom in a patter of slimy opinions, while outside a storm of data has gathered.
They start with the logic of Euclid. The shortest connection between two points is a straight line. What is a straight line? The shortest connection between two points. Regardless the straightness of the lines it is circular reasoning.
Then they continue with the wisdom of Newton. If there is no change in the di-rection of a moving body, the direction of a moving body is not changed. But if some-thing is changed, it is changed as much as it is changed.
They are like geologists, determining the age of the rocks by the fossils. How is the age of fossils determined? By the age of the rocks.

Now from medicine’s point of view:
What is the shortest possible connection between health and disease? The shortest possible time between giving a medicine and killing the germs is a straight poison. What is the shortest possible connection between disease and health? A straight poison is the best possible means to kill germs in the shortest time. Notwithstanding the straightness of the poison, it will also kill the patient by circumvention.
If a medicine does not change the numbers of the machine, the numbers on the machine are not changed. If a medicine does change the numbers on the machine, it changes them as much as they are changed. In other words, their statement is that the medicine is either useless and the patient does not get better. Or the medicine is supposed to work and the patient gets better. Such wisdom we must defile. If you ask the patients, they tell you they are not getting better.
Similarly, how is the virus determinable of disease? By the amount of vira in a disease. How is the disease determinable by the vira? By the severity of the disease compared to the amount of vira. Their statement is that when more vira can be seen more vira will be seen. Such wisdom we shall not defile.

Hence, circular reasoning is employed in medical science today. They find themselves in an august assembly, as we noted from our examples, yet the popu-larity of a faulty piece of reasoning does not make it right. This is however what one expects from faulty religious belief – it must use circular reasoning to remain stand-ing. The Church of Medical Science also presents its catechism in circular terms, in-voking mythological beings to sustain it. Here are the mythological entities that the Church has designated as worshipful.
The quasi-devil Virus and his consort Bacterium are the deities worshiped by the atheistic-materialistic Church of Medical Science. Bacterium and Virus are always in-voked, especially because nobody seems to have the faintest idea how to explain them. Generally, they explain them away as the Cause of all causes, a position, which religion reserves for the supreme deity. When these devils don’t suffice, the other devils, Bacillus and Microbe, can be invoked whenever Virus and Bacterium don’t answer their prayers.
A Money-Theistic Religion
There is a new star in the firmament of medical devils, invoked because neither the major nor the minor devils answered the prayers. They call this devil Hiv and he is the Evil One, who tries to dethrone the major deities. Gallo and Montagnier are the Moses and Aaron of this deity and they have given us their Ten Commandments on what it is and how to deal with it. After all, Gallo/Moses went up the Mountain Hiv and ‘saw the glory’. He appears to be gradually succeeding, but seems like the Golden Calf in appearance. This is no wonder, for this real and veritable devil is iatrogenesis in disguise.

Whether they jump or arrive at a more leisurely pace at the conclusion, they stubbornly believe Aids to be caused by Hiv. We expect the pantheon of devils to ex-pand much further once there are enough iatrogenic diseases demanding their ap-pearance. It is a polytheistic belief, as we discover, while they present themselves differently. Instead, they profile themselves as a purely money-theistic religion.

The Isopanisad says:

‘The wise have explained that one result is obtained from the culture of know-ledge and a different result is obtained from the culture of nescience.’
(Veda-Vyasa K.D. Iso. 10)

We see that even the so-called dangerous bacteria, like streptococcus and enterococcus live already at a population density from 10,000 to a billion in our throat, stomach and gut respectively. Enterococcus tops a massive 100billion, just like other bacteria such as staphylococcus, which are supposed to be dangerous. If this were so, then why do they belong to the largest population groups in the digestive system? Moreover, why are we not constantly sick at such densities?
It is simply because they already are very important for digestion and when we eat something spoilt, they merely increase their number to correct our stupid dietary indiscretions. Promptly, the doctors blame the bacilli and bacteria for the indiscretion, so absolving man from his responsibilities and making him a willing victim.
A Decent Burial
Let us look at the virus or germ theory a little closer. It is but an assumption that germs cause disease. They say their evidence is presented in the fact that when they kill the bacteria or vira, the disease is soon gone as well. The vira become active from some outside trigger – generally an invasion by and of those same germs. They attack the living cells and destroy them, in the process using the cell-DNA to multiply. A virus is really nothing more than a string of mRNA cells, which need another cell’s DNA to complete them and divide. If this is allowed to continue unabated, the body will succumb under the onslaught and the victim will die.

That sounds like the correct view, is it not? After all, Pasteur already proved this more than 150 years ago, is the argument.
Pasteur put medicine on the wrong foot and it has not made a single step forward since.
His Quasimodo of a theory is now about to meet its maker, since we will sufficiently show that it better join Pasteur in his grave. They then can both start turning, as we expose both their flaws – Pasteur in his faulty reasoning and his theory in its consequent Quasimodo Gestalt.

Pasteur made a few assumptions, which we shall scrutinise further, to discover whether they stroke with the facts or not. The first is the assumption that germs cause disease.
When a disease is full-blown, what is the picture of the blood and/or the tissues?
A so-called ‘viral or bacterial disease’ is characterised by a high level of vira or other germs in the blood and tissues of victims of full-blown cases, known as the viral or bacterial load. This is – and we should note this well – invariably the case with all viral or other diseases supposedly caused by a bacterium, a bacillus or a microbe. Invariably this is noted in full-blown cases. Before the case is full-blown we see but a corresponding amount to the severity of the progression. As we noted before about some wisdom we would not defile, if more germs can be seen, more germs will be seen.
If we examine the blood of any healthy person, we may find the virus or germ in some cases, but never in disproportionate amounts. In the sick, everyone has a very high count. When normally it may be one per million, in disease it is one or two per three cells. This is the picture and this is the reality of the facts with all diseases that have an associated germ, of whichever class
.
Therefore, we discover that the disease is nothing more nor less than an ulti-mate result. We go to visit the doctor when we feel sick and not at any other time. We do not go there for a social chat, but to complain about something that bothers us, gives us pain or is otherwise uncomfortable. There is no other reason why would go there. In fact, we try to avoid going there at all costs and postpone the visit till it is inevitable – the result has become too apparent and causes too much distress.
Doctors are not on our wish lists of frequent visits or visitors. We do not like them very much, for the things they have to say to us are those things we do not even want at all, let alone hear about them. Therefore, we stay away from them as much as possible. Vira and germs are not on our wish lists either and we want to avoid them also as much as we can. We do not seem to realise their importance, other than as the supposed destroyers of our health.

Cause & Result the Same?
What is important is that we must consider carefully what we observe. In a full-blown case of disease, we are looking at the disease ultimate. It is an end-result. From the moment we entered primary school, we have been taught that results are always different from causes and this is scientific.

As Hahnemann noted:

“Therefore disease, considered as a thing separate from the living whole, from the organism and its animating vital force and hidden in the interior, be it of ever so subtle a character, is an absurdity that could only be imagined by minds of the ma-terialistic stamp.”
(Hahnemann S. Organon §13)

Indeed, how could one think that a disease is an external influence? We typified it as aberrational, whereas Hahnemann characterises it in the starker term ‘ab-surdity’.
We know everything develops from the subtle to the gross, so that it follows that all material manifestations are emanations from a mental state that first had to think them out.
This is the case with every creative process – this book could not have been written if there were not some subtle idea at first, from which the entire concept could develop. That such a concept existed already in the facts is not to be construed as an external influence, inasmuch as its very existence was also the product of a subtle idea – albeit Pasteur’s idea, which he then tried to materialise in the germ theory.
In the same vein, disease is the development of a mental state, manifesting on the physical plane. Differently said, the physical state is a reflection of the mental state and as such subject to a dynamic process, rather than a mechanical one. The mechanistic expression – lesions, inflammations, etc. – are but external signs of an internal dynamic process, which will change the moment the mentality changes. In other words, we create our own diseases. External influence may appear as a proxi-mate cause, but that cause was created by our own behaviour.
In the Veda the causes of suffering are said to be of three kinds – those caused by the gods (nature), those caused by other living entities (people, insects, parasites and animals) and those caused by ourselves. However, right behaviour will remove suffering and the suffering that comes is a reaction to our own actions even if appar-ently done by others. Karma is the general term, but this is often considered a con-versation-killer. Generally, we all know the laws of thermodynamics, which we quoted above. That the direction we take in life moves forward till we undertake such action as to change direction, after which it changes as much as our efforts to change it. Vice versa, if our life takes a direction we do not desire, we only have to undertake enough action to change the direction. While this is equally vague as the law quoted above, with our lives we have the direction in our hand and can determine ourselves which direction it shall take. For it simply means the reactions to our own actions – a push-pull mechanism.

“The natural disease is never to be considered as a noxious material situated somewhere in the exterior or interior.”
                                                                  (Hahnemann S. Organon §148)

Even a parasite is the result of a mental state – stupidity in this case. Everyone can avoid parasites by simply being careful. Even parasites cannot enter the body when measures are taken for sufficient hygiene, proper preparation of food and boil-ing water. Each time we get sick, we have to thank ourselves – it is not any punish-ment that comes from the outside. The germ may have replaced the devil or even God, but neither of the three have ever been implicated in the punishment for man’s stupidity, since stupidity is both its own and carries its own punishment.
Hahnemann then comes with the only correct definition of what is disease:

‘The unprejudiced observer takes note of nothing in every individual case of dis-ease except the changes in health of the mind and the body. He notices only the deviations, which are felt by the patient himself, noted by those around him and ob-served and remarked by the physician. All these perceptible signs represent the dis-ease in its whole extent.’
(Hahnemann S. Organon §6)

Hence disease is nothing but a change in health of the mind and body, notable by signs and symptoms to the external senses. This is the long and short of every disease, whether caused by drugs or natural dynamic means. Anything else is super-fluous and irrelevant to the situation, because it distracts form the signs and symp-toms notable to the senses. It stresses numbers and machines, rather than people and experiences and is thus impersonal. How is it ever going to realise its ideal of in-dividually tailored treatment, if the individual is ignored?
Even the genes are too general to allow individual treatment, so that will also remain a chimera. Only the individual who suffers the diseased state is capable of providing all information hidden to the eye. No diagnostic machine will ever capture the individual experience of agony, anxiety, worry, pain or simply discomfort that is experienced by the patient and hence no machine is ever going to provide an indi-vidual picture. Only the individual is capable of doing so.

‘The irregular processes which we call disease are as a power invisible in itself and only knowable and cognisable by its visible effects on and sensations in the or-ganism, exposed to the patient and the physician. It manifests as morbid symptoms and in no other way can it make itself known.’
(Hahnemann S. Organon §11)

We see Hahnemann did not believe in the microbe as the cause of disease. Nei-ther do we. He also did not consider blood and liver value levels or biopsies, because they did not exist in his time. If he could do without, it fails to materialise why we now should put such reliance on something we cannot even experience.
He firmly established that the entire disease can be known by the changed sen-sations of the patient and by observable changes in the physical frame. He did not see a need for invasive techniques to trace the disease in the interior and considered them futile. Hence also in this respect we do not put much stock in such procedures, but consider them detrimental, because many of them cause further internal damage and weaken the patient and are thus counterproductive.
He knew that disease is a change in health that can be related to the doctor and cured by a remedial agent capable of producing such a disease in the healthy. A vi-rus in his day was nothing but a poison – the virus of the cobra for instance.
Jenner did his first experiments with the pox vaccine in Hahnemann’s time – around the time of his discovery of homoeopathy – and the bacilli, bacteria and other germs were becoming increasingly known, without the attached direct causal rela-tionship, which had to wait till Pasteur before this was established on the shakiest of grounds. Hahnemann made his discovery in 1790, while Jenner did his experiments in 1796.
Yet Hahnemann considered this nothing more than an idle allopathic dream, which did not tally with his contention that disease and cure are both dynamic pro-cesses.
(As an aside, it is since Jenner’s experiments with pox vaccine on sheep that the disease scrapie made its appearance. Before that time, scrapie was unknown).

Modern medicine does not consider the dynamics of either disease or medicinal action. It seeks to find the supposed material cause, which it hammers in, screws down, wedges in-between, shoves under or otherwise foists upon the germs. It sees the virus or other germs as exceedingly dangerous. They think that if they do not kill them, the patient is in danger.
The germs and vira always keep on multiplying as long as the disease lasts, till death follows, says the theory and shows the practice.
In addition, since death is the final end-result as they say, we must therefore conclude that abundance of vira or other germs is also an end-result.
Then how can they be the cause?

All wisdom is fear of the Lord;

i disagree.
fear is the assassin of intelligence and wisdom.

All wisdom is Love of the Lord.
because:
There are those with little understanding who fear God

while those who understand, Love Him

Squatters & Riot Squads
We referred above to cause and result as two different things and this is scien-tific. In viral diseases, they throw this scientific principle out the window and declare cause and result to be one and the same thing. This is unscientific, to say the least. Even children know this to be the case, so a scientist is at least expected to keep these two concepts neatly separated. It has no place in any scientific discussion, least of all medicine, where lives are dependent on thorough scientific principles and procedures. Why then does that not count for germs?
Germs are the exception to the rule, they say. That makes for many exceptions to the rule, for there are many different germs associated with disease. There are several gut bacteria, such as salmonella and escheria coli, to name but a few, they consider deadly, totalling more than 30 different ones. Some are used by the orthodox to make vaccines. Homoeopathy uses several of them as the bowel nosodes.
There are more than a just a handful of viruses, like the flue or pneumonia, quite a few bacilli, such as tuberculosis and microbes or even fungi associated with dis-ease and then we do not even count the ones they have not yet discovered.
Together, this veritable cornucopia of creatures makes for well over 100 excep-tions to the rule. That is exceptional by itself. Subsequently, it is therefore thoroughly unscientific. From this sort of attestation of failure we can see that the scientists follow Peter’s principle, where all the members in the hierarchy rise to their own level of incompetence.

Then how come that when they are killed, the disease apparently also is fin-ished?
Because these drugs are suppressing the disease, which will reappear soon en-ough; after a few such reappearances, the medicines no longer work and you remain sick – if you are lucky. If you are not that strong, the disease may, if necessary, mani-fest as a different and more severe complaint, at a different spot and moreover com-plicated with side effects, subsequently associated with a different germ. It is still the same disease, which has been forced to seek a new outlet. As an example we point out that a suppressed rash nearly always turns up as asthma and that nobody in orthodoxy has ever made the connection. Further examples will be given in Chapter 9.

The function of the germs is different from what Pasteur presented and that is why they cannot be exceptions to the rule and therefore do not cause disease.
If the medical scientists paid attention to what they see, they would have noticed that viruses attack only cells with receptors, to which they can react. Healthy cells do not have those markers, so the virus cannot attack them. Why else are we not con-stantly sick?
You all know the squatter’s movement here in Europe and especially in London and Amsterdam. They occupy houses and buildings that have been kept empty for more than a year, to allow real-estate speculators to drive up the prices for living or to push through a project where a useless harbour is costing a lot of money. It is a sick society that allows this to happen, as it is generated by the sick mentality of greed. This greed is btw one of the seven deadly sins and causes disease too – wit-ness all the stomach ulcers, heart problems, liver problems etc. in such people.
Disease is like squatters, who occupy cells on which they hang signs – ‘squat-ted’ – known as ‘receptors’. In society, a squatted building is immediately recognis-able too – painted outside walls, loud music, slogans on banners from the window etc. It is a sick mind and body that allows this to happen, just like the speculators and the housing prices in our society. The squatting continues till there comes a reaction from the body’s defence system, which is considered to be regulated by mainly the changes in the blood. While vira are also part of that system, they are classified as an ‘enemy combatant’, simply because their function is to destroy sick cells. As in society, the doctors think the body repairs the cells if the damage is not apparent from the structure, but only damage to function. From the evidence under the microscope – vira destroying such cells – it is evident that the notion is wrong, both in regard to the function of vira and in the assumption of repair in case of functional disturbance. For in the living blood and tissues, the cells are fed oxygen and the right nutrients, which the Petri dish does not provide, being constructed entirely of artificial nutrients that have different effects on the vira.

The situation with the squatters is that the Riot Squad – part of the police force – comes by and kicks them out, often destroying the building immediately after, so it cannot be re-squatted.
The vira are the Riot Squad, which comes to kick out the disease and destroy the cells so they can no longer be used by the disease. They only destroy cells with receptors; that is, the sick cells. The fantastic story that they attack healthy cells is therefore complete hogwash.
Instead of appreciating the work the vira do, they mistake them for ‘enemy com-batants’ and send in the army – GI-drugs – to destroy the police force. Thus they create a civil war inside the body, with heavy drugs.
Generally, a civil war ruins the country. If we look at the Aids phenomenon, it is this civil war, which destroyed the bodies of the victims. Here, as another aside, is proof the rules of warfare do not apply to healing and medicine.

Waging war on the microbe community is not only foolish, since they do not cause disease; it is detrimental to our health. It demands moreover that we accept too much collateral damage. It evidently ruins the balance in Slime City. It finally ruins not only the health, but also the life of the victim.
Slime City & its Illegal Occupation
That microbe community is a veritable Slime City, with all kinds of inhabitants, such as merchants, workers, farmers, thieves and so on, with several types of police, as well as an army, high-risers, highways and diverse other transport systems.
A recent survey of over 400 different entero-bacteria collected and subsequently stored between 1917 and 1954 suggests that resistance was very uncommon in the pre-antibiotic era.
That is an impressive variety of inhabitants of some very different ‘nationalities’ and therefore a multicultural society that performs admirably harmonious, if left to its own devices. We carry about a kilo of the creatures in the intestinal tract alone.
Some digest food, others are scavengers. Here may be one that destroys sick and old cells – a cop, throwing out disease – while there, another is engaged in cell construction – a builder. Some are engaged in business with each other, exchanging information and necessary protein codes, to create enzymes and assist each other in their mutual task. Others are kept busy stealing food from their neighbours. Many are busy digesting the food in your system and others transport nutrients to oxidation-reduction plants inside the stomach, the liver, the pancreas, the gut, and so on.
Slime City is a super-efficient 24/7 economy, with no roster switches, no insur-ance, no holidays and no severance pay – not even the possibility of retirement – you work till you die. Nonetheless, it is not a slave society, but the ideal consumer society, where the wares are not pushed by advertising, but simply shoved down the consumer’s throat. With sufficient garbage that even they cannot process, the cycle of production and consumption is doing what every such cycle does and does admir-ably well without our interference.

Another one – a scavenger – has the capacity to digest what is indigestible to others, received from a partial RNA strand scavenged somewhere from a plasmid that picks up on the targeted substance. Some members in that community learn to digest the antibiotics and so ‘resistance’ comes about. It is not that the germ be-comes resistant, but that the antibiotic never reaches them again – other germs or entities such as enzymes digest it first. Or the microbe learns to neutralise the anti-biotic by other means. There are several options open for microbes and bacteria or bacilli to deal with the occupying forces.

Even the pharmacopoeia says as much.

‘The three most important mechanisms of bacterial resistance are:
– production of an enzyme that inactivates the antibiotic or hinders it in its action, such as the ?-lactamases with the ?-lactam antibiotics and acetyl-transferase with the aminoglycosides and chloramphenicol. [Any term with ‘ase’ at the end denotes an enzyme that processes some substance in the gut, like food, alcohol, drugs, etc. Some enzymes are made in the gut, others in the liver, the blood or the stomach, etc.]
– reduction of the uptake of the antibiotic by diminishing the membrane per-meability, through changes in the protein cover of the external cell membrane, due to selective pressure of the antibiotic. Herewith the ?-lactam antibiotics, the chinolons, tetracyclines, trimethoprim and chloramphenicol are rendered ineffective. It may also use an active efflux, resulting from a difference in the membrane transport system, as it does with erythromycin and tetracycline. [The cell membrane is the outer cover-ing, which first is penetrated by the antibiotic, but the cell will make the necessary changes so that it can no longer penetrate.]
– changes in the bacterial proteins that were points of attack from or for the anti-biotic. A changed ribosomal protein is discovered with aminoglycosides. A further changed penicillin-binding protein is found with mainly ?-lactam antibiotics, while a changed DNA-gyrase is associated with the chinolons. Gyrase is an enzyme, which can trigger the winding of long DNA chains around an RNA nucleus. Chinolons an-tagonise this enzymatic activity. On this basis, chinolons are also designated gyrase inhibitors.’ [A penicillin binding protein is a protein that occupies the antibiotic with try-ing to neutralise it and so expends the drug’s energy. Chinolons are a class of anti-biotics that use this capacity to inhibit, to disable their target by attacking the DNA enzymatic activity. They are neutralised by the gyrase enzyme that triggers the wind-ing prematurely, before they have reached the target.]
(Martindale)


There are also plasmids, which are extra-chromosomal particles that carry pieces of RNA information from antibiotics that are spent, which germs absorb. They integrate this in their own DNA and so are able to neutralise, digest or otherwise ren-der the drug useless. We shall come across them in further quotes from the pharma-copoeia. This also shows another example that the DNA is driven by the environment and not the other way around. Without antibiotics, the plasmids would never pass it on and these drugs are brought in from the outside – they don’t grow in your gut, un-less you take too many.
We have not invented anything, as is plainly evident from the quote. The ortho-dox have set the rules and we merely report them. Whether these rules follow scien-tifically validated processes and facts remains to be seen. Up to this point, the evi-dence stacks against it, although the above suggests otherwise. Therefore it is also evident that using antibiotics carries the risk of resistance.
The resistance is conferred by mechanisms that although understood partly, do not explain everything there is to know. What they do explain, is that massive doses cause such resistance and that the reduction in the dose could very well do away with much of the resistance problems. If the dose is so small that the body detects it as but a small trigger, it will take care of the rest by itself.
The self-healing capacity of the body is always denied, except when used as an excuse to explain away cures with homoeopathy. Then it is either placebo, sponta-neous self-healing or the recuperative power of the body or the self-healing capacity. At all other times, it is denied the body has any capacity to heal itself. When it is pointed out that developing antibodies against disease is such a self-healing ca-pacity, they deny it any such power and declare it to be the result of physical reaction to an outside influence – again proof against their own deterministic genetic theory.
Never is there any mention of the mental state, required to contract disease, nor is there any consideration for its dynamic, rather than mechanistic nature. Reduction-ist-mechanistic theories of disease are granted professorships, as if the theorising about disease has any value for the finding of a cure. The results coming from such ‘studies’ generate theoretical models by the score, but fail to confer any insight into the nature of the dynamics of disease.
Antibiotics – Medicine’s ‘Grunts’
The Slime City inhabitants produce those enzymes – they do not arise sponta-neously. Microbes and other germs, assisted by plasmids, trigger membrane per-meability. These same plasmids also generate changes in bacterial proteins.
Thus, such ‘immunity’ or ‘resistance’ violates the orthodox parameters for treatment, which say that

‘the antibioticum must be able to reach the seat of infection’.
(Martindale)

This is the way they paint the picture; I am quoting their pharmacopoeia.

‘There are other mechanisms by which resistance is obtained. It can occur chromosomal as well as extra-chromosomal, the latter though plasmids, which are extra-chromosomal carriers of inherited properties. These plasmids are interchange-able between organisms through conjugation, transduction or transformation.’
(Martindale)

Since such material is freely interchangeable, it is unlikely to cause mutations, since mutations then happen all the time and therefore do not happen. Differently said, if they happen all the time, it is no longer exceptional but commonplace and therefore not mutation. This is because mutation is the appearance of the not so commonplace and the hardly viable. We shall see in a further chapter that working and healthy mutations are impossible to appear for several other reasons, making the mutation scenario not only highly unlikely, but also entirely impossible. We shall also show that every example used to explain mutation always involves a loss of a quality, a mismatch or an abnormality, none of which are ever passed on to the next generation. Thus the germs are simply adapting to the occupation and offering re-sistance, as everyone attacked would do.

However, some microbes are considered terrorists, mainly from the factions of BacZilla and al-BacTerium and of the smaller but supposedly more lethal Ali al-Vira-Faction. These are the very ones that are present in large amounts when we are sick and they are considered terrorists and insurgents, especially when they become re-sistant. Anyone who harbours these terrorists, is considered dangerous and must be isolated. Then the medical ‘war on terror’ kicks into gear – plenty medicine, prefer-ably in mixtures, ‘just to make sure’. The doses of medicine enter in an unrelentingly regular, goose-step cadence. A surge is started and when it does not finish soon en-ough they simply add more of the same troops in a bigger surge.
Then they exploit the case in the Media for dramatic fear mongering: ‘Seven new cases of al-Salmonella, norovirus or E.coli discovered today!’ ‘Health Authorities call for mass-vaccination!’ Just as we already reported at the beginning of this Chapter.
The reason they give for ‘just making sure’ is that it is assumed to ‘better be safe than sorry’. This remark is only of value when these are the only alternatives. One of the commonest defences against learning is to believe it is already known. If we say: “I know that,” when someone who understands our interests and how to teach says something, we are blocking our learning capacity.
Merely to reproduce our limited knowledge and circulate it to all interested par-ties may appear to be keeping in touch with them. But unless the occasion is suit-able, it is only of social value, not of informative usefulness, let alone of knowledge value. Why do they seek more knowledge when they pay no heed to what they know already?

As the Garuda Purana says:

“Reading to a man devoid of wisdom, is like a mirror to the blind.”
(Veda-Vyasa K.D. GP 5/3/48)

The victims are subjected to heavy bombardments of medicines, all sort of extra troops are summoned and added and if possible, ‘three letter agencies’ such as AZT and ddl, etc, are also sent to the front, to fight a losing battle against a resistant enemy or an invisible one. The sulpha-antibiotic daisy-cutters of medicine, like their real-life counterparts, kill indiscriminately and leave behind the unexploded bombs, just like other antibiotics, which kill off your defences and finally give you Aids.
And as in the real life counterpart, the Army and all the high-tech equipment and tools are impotent against the insurgency, which rages on three different fronts. War against the occupation; as a civil war against the excessive population influence of some inhabitants and about the general imbalance in Slime City, such as the division of the natural resources and their benefits – food and drink.

Adaptation is closer to the reality of the circumstances in Slime City, where har-mony and balance make for a stable system. In those circumstances mutations can only increase the imbalance, which is contrary to every observation one makes in na-ture or the human body, where balance is always maintained by all means. Since it is a cyclic process, harmonious functioning is to its advantage.
The proof they adapt and maintain order is found in that they seek the means to counteract our ridiculous doses of dangerous medicine to minimise the damage as much as possible. The medical approach is always linear, as opposed to the cyclic nature of the human system. The bacteria and other germs will maintain the cycle, while medicine will try to linearly interfere with that cycle.
We must first note that there is a great deal of difference between an adaptation to pressure and a mutation. A white person who never sees the sun and then goes out for the first time will also ‘produce alterations on the surface structure due to se-lective pressure’ – of the sunshine. He will turn either red or brown. This is no muta-tion, but an adaptation.
When such confusion of terms is used in one sentence, it is wise to take the weakest of the statements to hold the greatest merit. Multiple drug resistance is a fact. Alterations on the surface structure are also noted and thus factual.
However, someone who does not like cabbage does not mutate into someone else, once his taste changes. Similarly, the antibiotics may have tasted bad, but once the germs learned to digest them, no mutation occurred. They simply adapted to changed circumstances, just like the white person going in the sunshine to get brown or someone changing his taste for an article of diet.
Otherwise, we have to consider each adaptation a mutation, which goes way too far. Genetic material may communicate with the environment – as we shall see – but this does not mean the genes change in basic function – they simply add another possibility through adaptation.

The antibiotics, like grunts in the Army, ensure an ever-more inventive resist-ance comes about. For the body to stay alive, it must develop resistance, otherwise the medicine will kill it immediately. As with cabbage, the germs learn to engage it and render it useless or otherwise occupied. No such thing as a cartoonish mutant-ninja-turtle army here.
Vira, Bacilli & Bacteria – The “Axis of Evil”
To continue our apt comparison to the situation in Iraq, we shall highlight some of the conundrums that face the doctors as much as they face the Generals. Both are based on the false assumption that force is a way out of a situation that was wrong for starters, but has accumulated compound mistakes in its handling.
Even if the vira and other germs look or work different, they are also not mutations, but merely differently adapted members of the incredibly large community of microbes. They may have looked like normal citizens first, but now they wear shawls to avoid recognition. They have adapted to circumstances the medical profession has created with their excessive antibiotic use.
It resembles someone who was a builder – a fungus – and begins a building supply shop – a DIY for the al-Fungi crowd, for instance. Soon that DIY will become a Franchise chain store, as is evident from the facts in the field. It will resemble the no-bid contract of the ‘Halliburton’ of the Slime City Occupation “Enduring Ignor-ance”.
Or someone which was a scavenger and finally finds a niche where he finds all he needs and proliferates; while building his IED’s he becomes an insurgent, as much as his Franchise counterpart, for they will now feed on and off each other.
Some of the drugs and the bugs are simply other al-Qaeda agents, unwittingly or wittingly employed as countermeasures to disturb the insurgency. The orthodox have no idea which bug could become at least a nuisance and at worst even a threat to life, by their war on medical terrorists.
Prophylaxis as the WW II poster promises is also an illusion – ask any of the people with Aids if it ever worked. Prophylaxis is the concept of pre-emptive war, which the politicians in the US have finally discovered too, but which medicine also has followed since Jenner.

It is in this context also significant that Scientific American carried a report in 2005 about 200 soldiers who all got gonorrhoea. On inquiry by the staff it was re-vealed that they had been provided with blow-up dolls, since visiting prostitutes in Iraq was considered too dangerous. Hence for a joke the soldiers had a gang-bang of one of these dolls and one of the first was a carrier of gonorrhoea, who so infected all his mates. The story did not reveal what happened to the unfortunate and hapless soldier, once his comrades in arms found out who exactly had given them the clap.

That Slime City community has been studied – in the form of single microbes in isolation. It has never been studied as a whole, an entirety. They have some idea how many different members it has or what the function of some member are, within the context of the whole. They would pretend they know them all intimately, from the few they studied in isolation, when present in large numbers during a disease pro-cess.
We also do not know every member, but have studied it as a whole. Immunity is extended to the whole body in the context of a cooperative cyclically operating society, as we argue. The conclusion is obvious and denial does not make it go away. Only the totality gives you an idea of the goings-on in Slime City. It shows that microbes help a virus, enzyme or bacterium or vice versa and that the one-celled have a particular function, dependent on and in feedback with their environment and each other.
Gram-negative bacteria for instance have become ‘resistant’ and ‘more virulent’. Here we have a nice example of the goings-on in Slime City, where it is obvious that the gram-negative bacteria have learnt to evade or digest the antibiotics. Either an-other enzyme or bacterium, bacillus or microbe has learnt to digest it or the balance has been disturbed to the extent that other members no longer check the gram-negative bacteria.
Balance in a healthy Slime City means nothing less than each genus or species living there, having besides his normal role also a function comparable to ‘social con-trol’. This enables harmonious functioning of the whole. Just like in some parts of society social control has been lost, so it has similarly occurred in Slime City, where and when the antibiotic ‘GI occupation’ is allowed to take over and seemingly rules the roost.

They will initially eradicate or diminish one or more of the species and so another species gets the chance to multiply beyond its balanced proportion and set up un-wanted and unsuspected reactions. It has been said above that some antibiotics are encapsulated, meaning they still wreak their havoc, because they occupy space meant for other inhabitants. “A further changed penicillin-binding protein” means nothing less that it is encapsulated. Hence the ‘medical military’ has become bogged down and faces an insurgency.
A fungus encapsulated in ‘Slime City’ may well be the cause of the proliferation of the candida albicans fungus as we shall show in Chapter 13. It may also be the cause of the mycoplasma – another fungus – found in the blood of Aids victims. It also points to the frequency with which PCP pneumoocystis carinii pneumonia – an-other fungal disease – is implicated in Aids. These fungi are the ‘cooperating civil-ians’ in the ‘military occupation’.
They moreover enter the bone marrow and cause permanent depression of the marrow’s capacity to produce the necessary defence components of the blood. In other words, the Army of Slime City is infiltrated by hostile forces and destroyed from within, just like in Iraq. Wearing the proper uniforms, they are led into places where they can wreak havoc, kill innocent victims and completely stuff up the harmonious functioning of Slime City.
Like its Iraqi counterpart, the insurgents attack where they are least expected and under the guise of the occupation. Some will act like al-Qaeda and attack just any citizen of Slime City anywhere they possibly can. Others simply take over whole provinces and even manage to move out of such areas in counties they never even visited before. The al-bin-Fungus-Candida tribe is the main culprit of this type of in-surgent behaviour. Candida extension goes from its normal place in a niche in the gut to the anus and beyond, the buccal cavity and beyond and the genital area and beyond.
Together with their accomplices of the el-Fungi crowd, they occupy cities and provinces where they were never seen before and wreak havoc among the local population. Mycoplasma and pneumocystis carinii are other designated insurgents in this case. It is said that a few PCP fungi live in everybody’s lungs, but the body can easily deal with them. Mycoplasma is another story – in very small amounts it is harmless, but it always turns up in excess after antibiotic treatment. PCP is then also more abundant.
In Chapter 13 we will present the evidence for this thesis. In the same Chapter, the mycoplasma get a good going-over.
That these reactions are bad for your health is abundantly clear. That they can also turn out to be fatal is equally clear from the amount of victims. This is nonethe-less and therefore, completely unacceptable.

Suppression & Insurgency
Saddam Hussein suppressed the opposition and its symptoms – free press, party forming, demonstrations, you know, the lot. Yet the opposition did not disap-pear. Saddam's society was sick and remained so. Mind you, putting him aside has not exactly improved the situation. It also does not invalidate the comparison, but only reinforces it.
Similarly, allopathic medicines suppress the symptoms; pain, rashes, inflamma-tions, you know, the lot. Yet the diseases do not disappear. Like the opposition in Iraq, they go underground and spread.
The body is a sick one and remains so. The spread must occur, for metastasis is the inevitable outcome of suppression. It is a law of nature and these laws cannot be violated without paying the price. Regardless which drug you use to kill the virus or bacterium or other germ, it will spread.
Again the Iraqi situation is the perfect example. For similarly, the American and British armies also fail to kill the opposition – notwithstanding superior fire power and massive technological support – and as we see in the news, the opposition – now called an ‘al-Qaeda-inspired insurgency’ – only becomes stronger, for civil war is the wrong front. The medical equivalent is similar. Those powerful drugs and massive doses are bound to cause aggravation. It will closely resemble a civil war and an in-surgency.

The medical al-Qaeda consists of some of the supposedly most notorious in-habitants of Slime City. Like their real-life counterparts, they also have some culprits that are always invoked. Al-Zarqawi is an equally popular scapegoat as are Ali E.coli, Hassan Salmonella and al-Giardia, the ‘Deadly Trio’ from the GUT Brigades for the Liberation From Toxins. Take for instance BacZilla tuberculosis Koch, the alleged assassin who hails from the Kingdom of Respiratoria.
Now, as the latest ‘Osama bin-Laden of medicine’, the inexplicable and as yet positively unidentified ‘Hiv’ has appeared on the scene. This terrorist is worse than any they met before – he creates devastation in supposedly healthy Slime Cities everywhere. He has never been properly identified – no ‘wanted poster’ has ever ap-peared of him. He is an elusive, almost mythological creature – a bogeyman as anti-hero, for he always wins and seems to be beyond capture, is the claim. He seems to resemble the Jackal, famous from the ‘70s, featured in many assassinations.
Some say they have survived his attacks, but this is immediately denied as false claims by the medical establishment. He is ‘the bin Laden’ of modern medicine. He so devilishly clever, he makes others the scapegoats of his attacks – like BacZilla tuberculosis and the boys from the GUT Brigades. He seems to have some accom-plices, but we consider them but ‘fall-guys, patsies and useful idiots’. Candida and PCP pneumonia are some other of his supposed proxies too – another set of pos-sible fall guys and patsies. They merely come and fill the gaps. This is a ‘mole’s’ type of disinformation – tell a part of the truth and the truth-seekers will fall over each other to follow the lead to that dead-end. It will stop them from asking the right ques-tions. It will stop the ‘mole’ from worrying about exposure.
Hiv tests and viral load are some of the red herrings in this detective story. We consider that Hiv is really the ‘Government mole’, spreading disinformation. Mean-while, the real ‘bin-Laden’ has now unwittingly gotten some unexpected real accom-plices in the form of ARVs. These are supported by his sworn enemies too and to-gether they will continue this devastation.
Hiv Bin-Laden can both feel safe and be satisfied – or so he thinks.
However, his accomplices have been unmasked already and soon his own iden-tity will be fully known. For him no hiding in the Tora Bora Afghan cave. He hides in every medical history of the ones whose bodies have been devastated by his insidi-ous undermining of our health. That these histories are the Tora Bora caves of medi-cine – equally unknown and cavernous – escapes their attention.

From Iraq we have learnt another lesson – if you suppress an insurgency, it spreads. In disease we also see invariably the same. Like in Iraq this lesson has not been learned. Until this lesson is thoroughly imbibed and understood, all efforts at conquering disease will fail. Once it is understood, the conclusion must be drawn, which is found in the fact of the massive doses. Therefore the conclusion is to reduce the doses to the point that only repeated doses will set up a reaction and only in the healthy. In the sick these effects must of course match those of the disease.
Disease is like being locked up or like a closed lock. The tumblers in the lock re-semble the totality of symptoms. The only way to open the lock is by finding the cor-responding key, whose beard matches the tumblers in the lock like a mirror image. One key only can be fitted in the lock and only one or possibly two turns of the key opens the lock. The medicine is of course the key in this analogy.
Metastasis is always the result of suppression – the medical annals are full of the reports. Even after 200 years of this result, it has not been discovered by the orthodox why this always happens. They have simply accepted it as one of the vaga-ries of medicine, about which nothing can be done. Such fatalist attitudes will also blame the disease instead of the massive doses of medicine in the case of the de-mise of the patient.
The demise of the patient after such massive dosing is recorded in his files.
Study of these files will reveal that in 90% of cases the cause of death is found in the medicine.

Of course the doctor blames the disease, which was too fierce even for his ex-pertise. At the time the patient came, that same doctor acted as if he knew the dis-ease as an old acquaintance and he was the right person to turn to for a cure. That his failure is caused not so much by his ignorance as by the massive doses is only to his credit. After all, he does not decide the dose, but the manufacturer. Which is by itself a strange situation – imagine the tobacco manufacturer telling you how much to smoke or the car factory deciding how many miles to drive. While in the latter cases we can decide ourselves how much we indulge, with medicines the packet pre-scribes how much to indulge. Of course you can always ignore it and take less, but generally people tend to take more, when it helps. They go by the same adage as the Medical-Pharmaceutical Industrial Empire – that when little is good, more must be better.
The Bad Cleaner Syndrome
Disease can also be compared to a spring clean up. Disease must be eliminated from the body, to truly disappear. The doctors merely hide it, as a bad cleaner sweeps the dirt under the mat. Now if you have a cleaner that sweeps the dirt under the mat, you fire him! The doctors suffer from the Bad Cleaner Syndrome and must not be retained, just because they have an impressive title. Nowadays a cleaner is called a sanitary worker – also an impressive title. But if his work is sloppy, the title will not help him. Why then shall we have to retain doctors whose knowledge about the side effects is fragmentary, whose adherence to principles depends on fashion and prejudice, and whose treatment resembles unmitigated folly?
At the clean up, the body opens an outlet from which the dirt is released, be it pus, rashes, cancerous growths, warts or purging, whatever. Their orthodox treat-ment closes the door, by using medicines, creams, chemotherapy, radiation or sur-gery, whatever takes their fancy. Hence what we do not accept from a cleaner, we must certainly not accept from the doctors. Just as we fire the cleaner, we must fire the doctor who sweeps the dirt under the mat. Suppression and its consequences are far too serious a matter to be swept aside as unnecessary fear mongering; a tac-tic all too often employed when we question their decisions. That same fear monger-ing is, when it suits them, ruthlessly employed when they foist their surgical interfer-ence or their suppressive medicine upon the patient.
Metastasis means nothing less than the body seeking a new outlet. They close the door? The body will open the windows. They also close the windows? It will, if necessary, blow off the roof. But it will never disappear till they have brought it back to its original outlet – if their surgical interventions have not already removed that possibility – or they have buried the victim.
Not only are their mistakes buried in their protocols and the obvious deadly re-sults of failed surgery, they are buried in graveyards the world over, to the tune of over 30 million each year, from the accumulated mistakes committed by the medical sickness industry. To be exact, if extrapolated from US numbers, 32,5 million. A staggering number that is based on WHO statistics on how many victims there are in each category, which we shall enumerate here.
Side effects with deadly results in the US alone 600,000. This in the country that claims to have the world’s best medical care. Together with the other causes it adds up to 1 million. This is exclusive of the numbers of deaths in epidemics, Aids, cancer, accidents, drug overdose, suicide and homicide, which are preventable mental states, if only they would stop using vaccines. In short, this means every 1 in 300 people is going to die from medical stuff-ups. Homicide we may exclude from the list, but add up the other victims of medical shortcomings and the figure is reaching 1,5 million. This means the odds rise by a third to 1 in 200.
Scary!
Well, if that is their goal, then misery accomplished!

Most epidemics never get such high numbers – except maybe the Spanish Flue of 1918 or the medieval plague. Medical stuff-ups are therefore the largest epidemic ever known in human history and moreover constitute a permanent epidemic. Much more dangerous than any germ ever will be or can be, even when medical stuff-ups have given you Aids. Surprisingly, nobody tolls the alarm-bell!
The silence is really deafening and telling as well. It tells us they either are com-pletely ignorant of these important issues or they are trying to avoid having to answer for them, because they know all too well. Most conspiracy buffs would immediately assume the latter, but we can assure them this is not so – with the exception of those that work in the labs, doctors know little about their bugs. They know even less about the side effects of drugs, as Industry spokes-people have declared that 60% of the doctors are completely out of their depth concerning side effects. The rest may know some of the general ones of the medicines they prescribe most, but that is about the entire amount of real pharmacology possessed by the orthodox brethren.
More evidence of incompetence in the cleaning department we do not need. The medical establishment suffers from a massive bad cleaner syndrome attack but, like everyone who suffers from a delusion, considers those that question their notion to be deluded. We know how hypnosis works – if you maintain long enough you are right, you begin to believe it yourself.
They appear to suffer from another almost incurable condition, which manifests itself trough several well-documented symptoms. These are tunnel vision, exclusivity in accepted data, selective amnesia, blinkered notions and such like. Those who will-ingly surrender to these delusions and other similarly illusory notions, even embrac-ing them as the sole reality, are most at risk. Even homoeopathy can do little for these poor victims of delusion and illusion.
Limited Usefulness
Insofar as the germ theory could be useful, it is in the considerations of balance or imbalance of the Slime City inhabitants. As we noted, the absence of one or more germs results in the excessive rise of another, which then can impact on the person’s health. Candida albicans for instance, normally lives in everyone’s gut, performing its allotted task.
Antibiotics being fungi, prepare the fertile conditions for its explosive increase by destroying other bacteria engaged in limiting its spread to its allotted space. How-ever, excess Candida fungus growth has assumed epidemic proportions, while orthodoxy is vainly seeking means to destroy it. In the process, the patient’s life is destroyed.

In this manner only can any of the germs living in Slime City be of any incon-venience or danger to us. When we become sick from natural causes, some will also multiply, but this is for protection, because at such times an excess is needed to clean up the dead or sick cells, possessing receptors to which these germs can re-act. Once the disease has been conquered, these germs automatically revert to their original density and the others destroy their redundant excess.
This phenomenon is known as bacterial and/or viral load. The vira are cut to pieces and thus made inoperable, missing the entire RNA code to enable duplication. The bacteria are similarly rendered innocuous, and their toxic processes are reduced to more manageable proportions. The feeling of wellbeing returns and soon the blood will look normal again, with possibly an antibody against the disease just conquered.

This viral or bacterial load has therefore nothing to do with the presence of either Hiv or the inevitability of developing Aids. It is merely a sign that the body has ad-equately dealt with an infection, regardless its bacterial or viral accompaniment. The antibody is supposed to be against a disease, but it has never been shown to work directly against the associated bacterium, bacillus, microbe or virus. There are no re-ports of antibodies killing any of those germs, with the exception perhaps of an ex-cess that constitutes a real and present danger.
Much is made of the toxic nature of the bacterial process, while it is conveniently forgotten that rot begins in the mouth and that excrement is formed through a pro-cess of fermentation – all toxic processes with which the body deals admirably, even in disease. Cholera and dysentery are but fancy names for the processes of cleaning these toxins and their dead producers from the gut. They are neither the causes nor maintainers of the disease, but form the disease process itself as we explained above. For this reason these processes have received their names – cholera, typhus, dysentery, etc.
Their danger lies not in the germ, but in the debilitation that can ensue if not suf-ficient tissue salts are retained for proper functioning. When exposed to such states of disease, it is self-evident that nutrition is of importance. This diminishes the influ-ence the germs have in general and negates their causal designation.

Limited usefulness is something we can apply to most of modern medicine. The limit is in fixing people’s broken bones and necessary surgery, at which the orthodox are the past masters, unsurpassed by anyone. Limited usefulness is however too limited to be of any real use – both for the rest of medicine and for the germ theory. Pasteur’s aberration has been exposed as inadequate, ridiculous, absurd and con-trary to the facts. It has been designated as an aberration and an absurdity, but we could as easily typify it as pre-primary school, where the children have not yet made such distinctions between cause and effect.

Shameful in its inadequacy at discovering the aberrational nature of Pasteur’s Gospel, modern medical science must accept the dunce’s hat and stand in the cor-ner. It ought to be given lines to write, to imprint the dynamic nature of disease and to remove the reductionist/materialist paradigm from their thinking. Only then can we expect a rational approach to disease and health to finally develop. Homoeopathy has 200 years of successful practical experience in this approach and can offer our brethren help, if they so wish. We expect our helping hand to be bitten, as it will not be appreciated.

It is, as with so many concepts and so much speculation in modern medicine, in-complete, upside down and inside out. Taking the result to be the cause, imagining the patient having to answer to average criteria, being entirely experimental in both diagnosis and treatment, modern medicine is far from scientific or evidence-based. If it were scientific, it would have taken the evidence for what it is – a result.

Pasteur made so many erroneous assumptions in his presentation that we are surprised no intellect has ever questioned, let alone challenged the very notions. We suspect that cosy jobs and prestigious positions have a lot to do with that lack of scientific challenge. We suspect that fears of apparently loosing face, grants and possibly worse, such as position, are the main motivator for this glaring lack of scientific integrity – even 150+ years after the fact. So great is the esteem Pasteur has held, notwithstanding the amateurish quality of both his presentation and his evidence.

When such fools hold the highest esteem in modern medicine, we despair for its intellectual integrity, its scientific honesty and its quality of research and peer review. We despair, for it evidently shows that such qualities no longer exist in medical sci-ence. It shows they have all succumbed to the tyranny of conformation to the ruling clique, which shall determine which theoretical construct will rule all actions in dis-ease.

It shows that democratically arrived consensus decisions rule the roost, instead of scientific facts and proofs derived from them. This disgusting state of affairs rules modern medicine and strongly reeks of party spirit, where science is supposed to be above all parties; above all politics; above all bias; above all opinions. It shows medi-cine usurping areas where it does not belong – in private matters; in corporate mat-ters; in insurance matters; all based on this biased misconception of the germ theory.
And if it were truly democratic, the opposition would have at least a say. But as we remarked in the Introduction, their Emperor is demanding we submit to the tyr-anny of conformation – if not, exclusion is your lot. Their democracy suffers from de-mocratosis, for which there is no other cure than letting the dissidents not only have their say, but their concerns addressed and investigated.
Quid pro Quo.
Germs and the promise of killing them with antibiotics. The germ theory cracks like an earthquake into disappointments, into which fall expectations. They are con-tractions of metaphysicists, in their local search for completeness. Except for minor errors – plus or minus the elusive and mythological Mr. Average – they claim to have found completeness. Yet we can accept the super-completeness of God, but not their phenomenal completeness.

Sufficient adulation of the substitute – that is, the virus or bacterium – has be-come the aim of the researcher. Ignoring the existence of the real thing – or even its possibility – is as effective for practical purposes as if it was not there. That is tanta-mount to saying it does not exist. Equally often, they take one thing for the other, as they do with antibodies and Hiv – certain to produce only more confusion. To il-lustrate this, let me tell you a little anecdote.

Once there lived in Khartoum a young English boy who, with his nanny, visited every day a statue of General Gordon, seated on a camel. One day, the boy and his family were going to move to Cairo to live, so he came and visited the general one last time. He said: 'General, I'm not going to see you for a very long time. I'm going to move to Cairo.' Then he turned to the nanny and said: 'What do I say to the guy on General Gordon's back?'

Similarly, doctors do not reflect when they see the virus and think it to be the disease. They call it ‘General Gordon’, but they have no idea that they look at best at a camel, while the real General escapes their attention altogether. We will come across many instances of this ‘General Gordon syndrome’. He is, as an aside, also the representative of their idea of warfare against disease.
It is time to put their ‘General Gordon’ before the court-martial instead, to defend his self-defeating actions. They will have to put him before the firing squad for high treason. Then they can throw out those principles of war from treatment too – all in one go.

Similarly, they use that, which caused the problem in the first place – unsuitable drugs – to counteract it. What did not succeed at first, shall certainly not succeed the second time. Hiv is treated with drugs like AZT, which causes lowering of the CD4+T-helper cells. What rationale is there, to use another thing that causes the same prob-lem as the previous treatment? How intelligent is that? It looks like closing a hole in the ground by making another hole.
They are reminiscent of the New Age adherents. These claim you don’t need a teacher for spiritual development – you are to find out yourself. They expect that the same mind that put them in the state they find themselves to be – in need of help to get out – is supposed to get them out. From the result, it is plain obvious it cannot. The New Age adherents, like the doctors, are still a movement in search of a doc-trine. They belong in that class of people who, if they would throw a stone on the ground, they would miss.

In dubbing Pasteur a fool and his disciples ignoramuses, we simply return com-pliments they gave our predecessors, like Hahnemann, Hering, Kent and others. Their doctoring has generated the impression that all medical treatment is a fraud and a hoax. Even most simple peasants understand more than the doctors. Is it not shameful that a GP, drawing a good income, should not be able to care for his pa-tients, whereas others who haven’t studied his brand of medicine are?
The discerning intellect will see through the transparent eclectic evasions of their own ignorance. One who believes disease to be a localised phenomenon caused by a bug, is possessed by the desire for fragmentation. Like those who do quantum me-chanics; they are so deep with their nose up the bark of a tree they fail to see even the tree, let alone being aware of the forest. Let us give you another quote, from Paracelsus.

'Doctors, what is the use of the name, title and school, unless you have the knowledge? Whom do honours, the toga and the Bull behove, but those who have the skill? When disease puts them to the test, what use is toga, title or certificate, when they are forced to admit failure? They blame the disease, but fail to mention their own incompetence. In their field, we have more successes than their entire industry combined – I dare them to refute me. Accredited asses would not be more incompetent swindlers than those who claim to be doctors, but declare the common cold incurable.'
                               (Paracelsus De Natura Rerum)

Today we are a massive 500 years further and thus more ‘advanced’, suppos-edly. We have an impressive array of machinery to assist the doctor in both diagnosis and cure. Indeed, what use are stethoscope, x-ray machine and the im-pressive array of other high-tech machinery, unless you can cure the sick with them? When disease puts them to the test, they still stand with their hands in their hair and their mouth full of abracadabra. For the common cold is still incurable, they admit.
If it Is Not a Germ, it Is a Gene
Hiv is imaginary and mythological, as we shall discover. The cause of disease from germs is mythological too – albeit not fabricated by the doctors, but by Pasteur. The genes causing disease is just another myth. Genes are not deterministic, how-ever much they would like them to be so. The product is never able to influence or ef-fect changes in the producer.
That genetic determinism is therefore another myth, for we know that every cell in the body has the same chromosome packet with the same genes, yet they are all different cells. So how has the gene determined the healthy or diseased function, form and structure of each individual cell?
By mythological means, for it has no other possibility, being not deterministic.
Let us give you the definition of myth: In the modern understanding, myth has no basis in reality. According to the dictionary:


“Myth, mith n. a figment; a commonly held belief that is untrue, or without foun-dation.”
                                               (Chambers 20th century Dictionary)

In reality, genes act through feedback loops, which help the cell develop accord-ing to its environment. Thus a cell becomes a blood cell, an epidermis cell or a mus-cle cell only because its surroundings determine the need. When a cell is diseased from the start – birth – there is a possibility that it is genetically determined, but in general it is under pressure from consciousness or the environment. Under the next heading we shall return to the latest scientific findings regarding genes and determin-ism.

Their causes consist solely on false conjectures and fictions of the imagination. For it is a false conjecture to say the disease is in the antibodies or the viral load. Cause and result remain different eternally, regardless their insistence they are the same.
Nobody can experience the viral load as such, for he cannot even know it is there until their tests reveal it. It is a figment of the imagination to assign causal power to a concomitant and end-result of disease; the germs.
It is therefore also a fiction – another myth – that with the death of the so-called disease cause – in casu the germ – the disease has been conquered.
Furthermore, to call someone cured when he is still suffering the effects of medi-cine is not only self-delusion, but also deception of the patient. He seldom believes the doctor anyway, just because he still feels sick, we can guarantee you.

Disease is like a criminal and the records of medicine must therefore be similar to criminal records, with fingerprints, photograph and profile of character. In the same manner, the disease can be recognised by the symptoms produced in the patient, corresponding to the record of the matching individual medicine.
This is the dream of the allopathic brethren and can only be realised if the homeopathic system is adopted and the wild-goose-chase after the chimera of the germs is abandoned. They are stuck in the linear tunnel vision of direct cause and ef-fect, which always fails to explain all parameters and is left with inexplicable phe-nomena. Medical orthodoxy is no more than a sham, designed to prolong people’s sickness and make as much money out of their suffering as possible.
Viewed on its own merits, orthodox medicine is hopelessly inadequate and unscientific. Actually, you cannot view it on its own merits, for it does not possess any.

Oh, for those tuning in....I'm trying to do this a bit like a radio show interview of Dr. Kaviraj, but our posts are scattered among many threads here.  Part of the earlier correspondence relates to this thread:

http://hpathy.com/homeopathyforums/forum_posts.asp?TID=8381&PN=3

...It's a bit scattered and making us dizzy at the moment.

So what do yu want to know?

Let me think about it after my head stops hurting.   I'll hit you with some questions later.  Phew, you got me laying an egg on that last thread regarding my prescription.  

Monster must go rest now.