| Edward, I've been to your
website and was impressed; you seem very accomplished! Would you
like to be our next Homeopath in the Hotseat?
Yes of course! fire away.
Great! OK, Edward, prepare yourself for a
stream of thought-provoking, challenging questions! Question #1.
Who are you?
Ough ... well.
I'm sorry, that wasn't a very good answer.
Let's try this, what is your name, or, alternatively, what do you
do?
My name is Edward De Beukelaer and I graduated as a 'normal'(?)
vet in 1986 in Belgium (Flemish speaking part of Belgium -- like
the Dutch language). I spent 18 months in the UK (Wales) before
moving to France where I worked for 13 years in mixed practice.
In 1990, out of frustration with lack of possibilities to offer
to clients, I discovered homeopathy--first through reading a book,
which I did not understand; but, it made me realise there was something
else out there.
I then enrolled in a 4 year course in Paris organised by a group
of homeopathic vets. I discovered a strange mixture of unicist,
pluralist and complexist homeopathy and quibbles between the teachers.
It was all very exciting and I felt there was something really sound
I was learning but I could not sucessfully use the 'different prescription
techniques' I was taught. I must have been very motivated because
most of my colleagues who started at the same time abandoned the
courses before their finish.
After these four years of homeopathy, I floated in nowhere-land
for 18 months until I enrolled in a school in Belgium (CLH- French
speaking). Many of the first year students were in the same boat
as I was. But this time things started to make sense and my first
successful prescriptions arrived soon! The technique I learned there
was based on the Synthesis repertorisation (in English, to the disgust
of many of my French colleagues) and ideas from Masi but watered
down to a usable veterinay/human type of homeopathy. (3/4 of the
school members are doctors 1/4 are vets). The head of school (Marc
Brunson) is a vet who keeps a low profile but is a regular speaker
in all French/Spanish congresses in Europe and Canada. His concept
of using what is peculiar in the substance to create some understanding
of the remedy (now very much represented in Vermeulen's Prisma)
has been very helpful to kickstart my grip on remedies.
Three years ago I moved to the UK where both my wife and I lost
our hearts. I have taken on the occasion to establish myself as
a classical homeopath.
Because I need to feed the family (5 children), I still work conventionally
in a practice while my clientele slowly increases. In a way I like
to keep in touch with conventional medicine. It has its own merits
and can be used if this is in the interest of the patient. In my
case, the patient cannot choose which type of medicine is presented
to him. At the same time, this allows me to introduce homeopathy
to people who are coming for conventional medicine. Although it
is difficult to turn them completely alternative, successes make
good publicity for the homeopathic cause. I am not against the use
of conventional medicine (what really gets me cross is the widespread
abuse and lack of respect). I am quiet happy for people to continue
giving medicines to their animals until my prescriptions have proven
that they can take over. This makes it more demanding on my prescriptions
which I consider a good exercise. (Never forget: find what is strange,
rare, peculiar, original in the patient, never forget, never forget,
never...)
I don't use much other non-conventional techniques. Homeopathy
gives me enough to study, filling my evenings (and brain). Also,
a good homeopathic prescription is often sufficient to help the
patient if basic hygienic conditions are ok.
I discovered the Hpathy.com
site a few months ago and take some pleasure in posting the odd
comment.
So you're a vet, then. Now Edward, I imagine
you must feel at a disadvantage sometimes, as the Repertory is written
for human beings; so, are you forever asking yourself, "Where
do I find this animal symptom in the repertory?"
Yes and no. Although in veterinay homeopathy we listen to the owner,
it is important to create a situation where they speak out freely
so we can use exact words and phrases like in human homeopathy.
In many cases it is only possible to use the mind symptoms as a
confirmation or differential between other remedie(s) that have
been selected based on modalities of physical symptoms. I think
the trap of mental symptoms is the same in veterinary as in human
medicine. I also make use of a thematic repertory (Loutan, Swiss
homeopath, in French very Masi orientated and difficult to read
but sometimes helpful following original remarks from owners). Recently
I used Lac lupinum for a dog (with succes aparently, wait and see).
The owner repeated at least three times during the consult that
her dog had the look of a wolf when his occasional agressive/wild/strange
behaviour/attitude came to the surface. He is normally a very well
behaving, well educated golden retriever. Nothing very interesting
came out of the consult. Because a similar disturbing wildness is
present in one side of his family I thought that a milk remedy may
well be of some use in this case. It is unusual for people to say
that their dog has the look of a wolf where this animal has had
a normal education. Since there was nothing else I thought this
was worth a try. (I will let you know if the remedy works for more
then a year, seriousness obliged.)
Anything goes, as long as you look for the unusual and rely on
good sources.
Fears, sensitivities, "ailments from" can often be used.
When characteristics like 'anger' anxiety and 'restlessness' can
be modalised this can come very handy as well. Alternations and
other modalities always come handy. Generally (I) we don't use too
many symptoms and search for the symptoms that stand out for any
particular reason.
To illustrate the above I will have to make some publicity for
myself: I have put a book together titled: Homeopathy. What to expect?
It is written for the general public and contains an introduction
explaining homeopathy. The second part will be more interesting
for you: It is a compilation of 101 veterinary cases already published
in French by 17 different homeopaths which I translated into English
to illustrate the workings of classical (veterinary) homeopathy.
Some of the cases are real gems. (I hope it will be out in the next
following weeks.)
Can we shift gears and talk about my son,
Larry, (a German Shepherd)? Larry died in 1988. He was a real sweetheart;
the whole neighborhood loved him, but he had a strange trait: he
did NOT permit rambunctious behavior between two adults! For example,
if you and I were to laugh real loud and I were to slap you on the
shoulder, Larry would leap up, run over to us and bark sharply,
as if to say, "Stop that! You can't do that! That was very
bad!" And you would stop, needless to say! Another thing about
Larry was, if you wanted him to do something, you had to ask politely!
"Larry, would you please lie down? Thank you." And I would
always have to explain to people that you had to have manners or
Larry wouldn't like it. Actually, come to think of it, you couldn't
even hit yourself! If you laughed and slapped your own knee or leg,
he wouldn't permit that either. So, how would you translate this
idea into repertory language and do you sometimes feel that animals
aren't being well-served by not having a repertory of their own?
I will start by noting that the case is a little short (just to
be on the safe side...) but let's see what we can use:
First: Larry is a German Shepherd: they are bred to control and
keep order. Therefore part of his behaviour is normal. What is less
normal that he even interferes when people get on well. This allows
us to use 'dictatorial' (you said he is a real sweatheart: this
increases the value of the rubric as a contrast). Second rubric
we could use is 'flattered desired to be'. One could also use sensitive
to rudeness (although this does not reflect exactly what happens
but may give some ideas) and sensitive to moral impressions. I would
not use 'mildness' because this is such a common symptom. A series
of remedies come up: Aur-m-n, puls, sulf, med, lycop, pall and Nux.
Based on the short text I go for nux v (although I would seriously
consider pall). The fact that he even does not tolerate you slapping
your own knees seems rather important, making the case for nux.
(this needs to put into context to his general education.) (one
dose of Nux v 200 ?)
One thing that is really important is not to select the first remedy
that comes up in your repertorisation when using mind symptoms.
Repertorisation is there to give you ideas. Although, one rule that
seems to be relatively valuable is to always consider 'small' remedies
that show up amongst polycrests.
It also depends on the species: the more they have spent time with
humans (are close to humans) the more they seem to 'copy' us. Dogs
and horses have very good mind symptoms, cats and cattle are a little
more difficult, and so are rabbits and sheep.
Physical symptoms are very similar to human materia medica. We
obviously lack the coloration of the skin and all the sensations
but at the same time 'menses' can be used for 'heat' in animals
although this does not reflect the same time in the female cycle.
You can use your imagination: if the symptom you want to use in
the repertory 'reflects' what happens in your patient, go and have
a look! One nice example is a case of diabetes in a dog that did
not show the normal weight loss one always sees. My colleague (Marc
Brunson) used Rectum, diarrhea, weakness without, to find Phos acid
that turned the dog around (without insulin). Another rubric like
'homesickness' can be used for an animal that does not like any
sort of change. It is the 'modality' that primes over the symptom.
I don't think we need a veterinary repertory. Such a work can certainly
be of benefit (I think there is a project going on). But because
of the amount of (tried) information there is in our repertories
it would be silly to disregard them in veterinary medicine.
Separate veterinary and human homeopathy would be a mistake. I
have so many times experienced how we can learn from human prescibers
and how they can learn from us.
|