*Mentals can lead a practitioner astray. Our judgement
is always biased, our interpretations based on our own experience.
Rather than using subjective interpretation, try using objective
interpretation – circumstance. What happened is more accurate
than “how do you feel about what happened” – for example
· A patient has suffered
a business loss and their health declined since – they are angry,
embarrassed, annoyed and frustrated
Rubric = Mind – business (join all business related rubrics
– dreams of business, business failure etc)
· A patient has been
affected deeply by the death of her parents and younger brother.
Recently a friend died and her health and emotions have been
affected again. She is sad, depressed, lonely and angry
Rubric = Death (join death rubrics or pick a large rubric such
as Death presentiment of)
It is common for people to experience many emotional feelings
over an event that has upset them. Terms such as anger,
sadness and depression can be found in our repertories but commonly
expressed emotions such as frustration cannot. If we list
all the mentals associated with the event we will have too many
rubrics, so instead of interpreting and trying to find a matching
rubric use one rubric to describe the common circumstance.
The energy of that event will contain the remedy they need.
Analyse the case
· Take one or two
mentals (use circumstance over feelings unless the feeling is
very clear)
· Take three to five
generals
· Take one or two
physical symptoms that are descriptive
Repertorise
Every case must be repertorised – do not assume you “know”
remedies. How can you know Sulphur
(15,191 rubrics*) or Phosphorus (12,961 rubrics) or Arsenicum
(10,974 rubrics)?
*MacRepertory 6
Choose rubrics that have at least 30 remedies in them – keep
the case broad at this point – you don’t want to lose your remedy
at this stage. Think of it like casting a net to get as
many fish as you can that will be suitable – once they are caught
you can sort through them for the best fish – but make sure
your fish is in the net on the first round.
A well rounded repertorisation should throw up 10 to 25 possibilities.
If there are more than 25 remedies choose one more (broad general)
rubric to narrow the choices.
Facial analysis
Every feature on the face is influenced by the internal energy
of the patient. The sum total of these features displays
the miasm of the patient. The HFA project has determined
more than 70 features, each of which is considered either psoric,
sycotic or syphilitic – all have been tested clinically.
The average adult patient will have 10-20 of these features.
Older people more and younger people less.
Features such as eyes, nose, mouth, teeth, chin and ears are
rated by
· Size
· Position
· Angle
· Shape
Lines are rated when they are clearly seen
Hairlines by their shape
Foreheads by their shape and/or angle
Two books are required to learn how to analyze and rate features
properly
(Appearance and Circumstance by Grant Bentley – 2003 and Homoeopathic
Facial Analysis by Grant Bentley – 2006). When studied correctly
practitioners can start getting accurate outcomes in weeks -
the average practitioner needs about three months practice to
become proficient at facial analysis. Once a practitioner
has experience they will quickly see features and rate them
immediately (movies will never be the same again – what is the
miasm of that famous actor?). With experience, facial
analysis takes a few minutes at the end of a consultation.
Yet, it is the most vital piece of information.
VCCH has developed a free online facial analysis tool (known
as the facial wizard) – it can be accessed through the Soul
& Survival website www.soulandsurvival.com
It is a more lengthy process than the analysis a trained practitioner
undertakes – often more than 30 minutes per analysis as opposed
to a few minutes when the process is well learned. This
is because the wizard is based on feature recognition only –
every feature – not just the miasmatically influenced ones.
If the operator makes an error in their identification the result
may be incorrect. However for those interested it is a
way to learn more about facial analysis and hopefully a tool
to excite interest. (We feel like screaming from the rooftops
– this is the best, best system for finding accurate remedies
for chronic disease – give it a go).
Bringing it all together
At the end of the case you have a repertorisation with 10-25
remedies, a list of which miasms those remedies belong to (Appearance
and Circumstance) and a facial analysis telling you which miasm
your patient belongs to.
Example
Repertorisation = Sul, Puls, Nux, Bell,
N Mur, Ars, Calc, Phos, Con, Thuja, Sepia,
K Carb, Sil and Carc
Facial analysis = Syphilitic miasm
There is only one remedy in this list that belongs to the syphilitic
miasm – Conium
Conium is chosen
We no longer check the materia medica to see if the remedy
“matches”. The materia medica is one or more authors attempt
to précis the symptoms of the provings (which are all in the
rubrics). If you were given the Sulphur list (15,191 symptoms)
which ones would you leave out? We have the benefit of
computers which our predecessors didn’t have the advantage of.
They had no choice but to cull down to simplified pictures,
but what if your patient doesn’t match their idea of the “Sulphur
picture” – what if they are chilly instead of hot, what if bathing
ameliorates them (yes, these belong to Sulphur too) or worse
,they have had suppressed gonorrhoea and you are using pathology
to find a miasm (yes, Sulphur has this too yet it is a psoric
medicine). Essence pictures and pathology are spurious
ways to determine the internal miasm – facial analysis is accurate.
So our sweet little old lady who doesn’t match the essence
picture or even the materia medica picture gets Conium for her
headaches and skin condition. And she gets better.
And the repertory becomes far more important than the material
medicas.
Summary
HFA has turned our practice of homœopathy on its head.
We do less theorizing than before and repeat this same practical
approach over and over. Every case is treated in the same
way no matter the presenting illness or type of patient.
· Case taking
· Case analysis
· Repertorising
· Photos
What we leave out - interpretation, feelings, suppositions,
deep and “meaningful” psychoanalysis. What we get is results.
Results vary from practitioner to practitioner but it is common
for a first year graduate to get good results with 70%+ of their
patients within four remedy tries (within the patient’s miasm).
More experienced practitioners regularly get 80% or greater
– some 90% or more. These results have risen in the last
few years as we have fine tuned the system. After teaching HFA
for the last few years we also see students who know what to
do and get results in the first years of training. HFA
gives a practitioner confidence.
As you read the following cases you will see the miasm referred
to by colour. For those unfamiliar with this miasmatic
model the following summary is presented. There are seven
miasms
· Psora – yellow
· Sycosis – red
· Syphilis – blue
· Syco-psora – orange
· Syco-syphilis –
purple
· Tubercular – green
· Cancer - brown
Where to find out more
Victorian College
of Classical Homoeopathy – miasm research
- www.vcch.org
Principles of Soul & Survival and facial analysis wizard
- www.soulandsurvival.com
The practical application of HFA
· Appearance and
Circumstance by Grant Bentley
· Homœopathic
Facial Analysis by Grant Bentley
Available through Homœopathic book sellers or www.vcch.org
The philosophy behind HFA
· Soul & Survival
by Grant Bentley
Available through Homœopathic book sellers or www.soulandsurvival.com
VCCH is currently developing an online course in HFA.
VCCH holds open clinics (live case taking, case analyis and
facial analysis) every month in Melbourne, Australia – see website
for details.