| After Dr. Vijay Vaishnav’s inspiring Grand
Rounds lecture on asthma and homeopathy in April 2001, seven students
and two faculty from NCNM organized an eight-week rotation at Shree
Mumbadevi Homeopathic Hospital in Mumbai, India. Despite the usual
obstacles inherent in international travel and the prospect of being
in India during the height of the monsoon rains, the program turned
out to be one of the richest educational experiences imaginable,
truly an immersion program in homeopathy!
We lived in the hospital, two floors above the outpatient clinic,
and just down the hall from both the inpatient unit and maternity
ward. We followed the progress of the hospitalized patients and
observed several births. For naturopathic students without much
exposure to "doing rounds" on an inpatient unit, we saw
deeper and more acute pathology than we typically see at the NCNM
clinics. We also observed multiple births on the maternity ward;
an unexpected pleasure to hold infants just minutes young.
We saw a high volume of patients at the homeopathic outpatient
clinic of the hospital, between 300-400 per day. We had six different
clinic shifts during the six-day workweek, one per morning over
an eight-week term. This system allowed us to see up to 50 patients
per shift, and gave us the invaluable opportunity to observe several
doctors with effective but vastly different styles of practicing
homeopathy.
The intake rooms were small! Each contained a desk, five chairs
(the largest for the doctor) and a small exam table that could be
sectioned off for privacy with a hanging curtain. The walls and
ceiling suffered the fate of tropical climes, and the more luxurious
rooms had a fan. The fan was indeed a luxury, because when up to
thirty students eagerly sardined themselves into the room, temperatures
soared high. Two to three times a shift, the sounds of the monsoon
rains permeated the interview, the rain’s sweet coolness bringing
relief from the heat. Perhaps OSHA would disagree, but we all quickly
resonated with the state of the intake rooms; it represented the
efficiency and wonder of homeopathic health care that worked so
very well in India.
The Indian homeopaths treat diseases that most homeopaths here
in the states wouldn't attempt to treat homeopathically, i.e., hydrocephalus,
leprosy, and on one memorable occasion, a cobra bite complicated
with cellulitis. The supervising doctor and students carefully weighed
the risks and benefits of treating allopathically vs. homeopathically.
For example, the decision to prescribe (or not) for a twelve-month
old girl with hydrocephalus carried a high degree of risk. On the
one hand, a failure to select the proper remedy would very likely
have resulted in permanent brain damage. On the other, a surgical
introduction of a shunt could easily have induced infection and
certainly suppression of symptoms. The supervising physician, Dr.
Devadiga, decided that we could give homeopathy a trial for six
months before referring for surgery.
The clinical faculty of Shree Mumbadevi was extremely well versed
in pathology and diagnosis. They emphasized understanding the common
symptoms and the usual progression of disease states in order to
distinguish characteristic symptoms. Because many of the outpatient
cases required acute treatment, we frequently relied on a lesional/regional
approach.
Nonetheless, etiology, miasm, and mental/emotional symptoms, when
available, also played a significant role in remedy selection. Case
analysis and prescription often involved a miasmatic approach. Sometimes
an anti-miasmatic remedy was given to treat the soil of chronic
disease. As Dr. Devadiga, our primary Organon teacher, would say,
"unless you've got a plant (characteristic symptoms) you've
got to treat the miasm of soil so that such a plant can grow. Only
then you can prescribe on the characteristic symptoms of the plant!"
We also used miasmatic remedies as intercurrents. When a patient's
progress was waning on their simillimum, we were taught to prescribe
the miasmatic remedy, and then later re-dose with their simillimum.
I think that there is a common misperception about Indian prescribing--that
it is a keynote oriented and superficial approach. Indian homeopathy
is by no means monolithic. In fact, although the term Bombay Group
or Bombay School is usually heard in association with Rajan Sankaran's
group, he only adopted the term. Bombay School, coined during the
1950's, was originally intended to distinguish the Calcutta School
and their keynote approach from the Bombay School and their more
comprehensive approach.
There are several groups and varying methodologies used by Mumbai
homeopaths, and it was wonderful to be exposed to several of them,
a homeopathy sampler of sorts.
As we know, there is a wide spectrum of homeopathy being practiced
worldwide, and Mumbai is no exception. From the scientific to the
artistic, the proving-based factual to the imaginative, there are
practitioners in Mumbai that are representative of each station
along this continuum. Our primary contact, Dr. Vijay Vaishnav, guided
us toward the scientific end of the spectrum. We were grateful for
this. Without a firm foundation in the rock solid symptoms of the
materia medica and time-tested rubrics, it's easy to get lost amidst
kingdoms, dreams, group provings and essences. Though it is clear
that there is also room for the latter, they can be misleading places
for a student to begin.
Clinics generally lasted three to four hours. In the afternoon,
we attended tutorials: one instructor to the seven of us. The college
is split into three departments: Organon/philosophy, repertory,
and materia medica. There are 6-8 faculty members in each department
who specialize in that subject. The tutorials mainly consisted of
a teaching followed by discussion and often would begin with discussion
of cases seen that morning. We covered a significant amount of ground:
classification of disease, symptomatology, susceptibility, posology,
second prescription and miasms; every subject firmly referenced
back to the Organon. One of our primary texts was the Principles
& Practice of Homeopathy by Dr. M.L. Dhawale; one of the clearest
and simplest explanations of the underlying principles of homeopathy
I've read, it would be a great text for an introductory course.
We also attended classes with Rajan Sankaran and analyzed cases
with some of his senior students. Sankaran taught Kent's repertory,
rubric by rubric, starting with the mind section. He defined each
rubric, explained why each remedy belonged to that rubric, and discussed
cases in which he had employed the rubric. A dynamic lecturer, he
tied in the humanities, contemporary film, politics, and culture
into his lectures. During one class, after analyzing each character
of a popular Bombay film, he implored us to bring our repertories
(and a flashlight) to the movies! His emphasis on disease as delusion,
awareness as cure, and his 10 miasms placed him in stark contrast
with most faculty in the homeopathy department. Nonetheless, he
maintains a clinical post at the hospital, seeing patients there
one day per week.
Dr. Vijay Vaishnav, one of the two doctors who created Shree Mumbadevi
hospital, was our primary contact during our rotation. He organized
our clinic shifts and tutorials.
Anyone with an interest in homeopathy who wishes to establish an
invaluable international tie would do well to contact this man.
He repeatedly astounded us with his consummate skill as a clinical
physician, a homeopath and an organizer. His humor and sensitivity
toward his students and his patients easily earn him the respect
and gratitude of all who work with him. Without him, we would never
have had this extraordinary summer; we owe him much gratitude.
For each of the NCNM students involved, this rotation was an opportunity
of a lifetime! Hopefully, with the help of the HANP, interested
students from all the naturopathic colleges will have the opportunity
to study homeopathy in India for part of their clinical education.
Many thanks to Drs. Kip Bajaj, Marlane Bassett and Kelly Fitzpatrick
for their support, guidance and teaching! Also, I’d like to
acknowledge Daniel Noam Smith’s colorful contribution to this
article.
-----------------------------------------------------
Ian R. Luepker, N.D., DHANP is a homeopathic and
naturopathic physician licensed in the states of Washington and
Oregon. Dr. Luepker is specialized in the pediatric treatment of
Autism Spectrum Disorders, including Asperger Syndrome, and of other
behavioral, developmental, and psychiatric issues. He is co-author
of A Drug-Free Approach to Asperger Syndrome and Autism: Homeopathic
Care for Exceptional Kids and can be reached by phone at 541-482-2824.
His website is http://www.madronahomeopathy.com/
This article was first published in the Simillimum (Volume XV Issue
2 Summer 2002)- The Journal of the Homeopathic Academy of Naturopathic
Physicians.
Reprinted by permission.
Dr. Vijay Vaishnav’s comments:
Dr. Ian Luepker's article about the experiences of the students
of NCNM in India is really balanced and gives a 'wide-angle' exposure
as well as a close-up of the working of our hospital and the clinical
training program that I had set up for them at Smt. CMP Homeopathic
Medical College and Shree Mumbadevi Homeopathic Hospital at Bombay.
I wish to point out a factual error. Ian has written "Dr.
Vijay Vaishnav, one of the two doctors who created Shree Mumbadevi
hospital, .......". I wish to set the record straight by stating
that I have not created Shree Mumbadevi hospital (though I have
put my heart and soul into its existence). It existed as a teaching
hospital, attached to our college, even when I joined the institution
as a student. I am at present a Professor and head the department
of Materia Medica at the college and it is part of my job as a full-time
teacher to attend to patients at the Out Patient Clinic and the
Wards of the hospital.
Students and Practitioners of homeopathy who wish to join the clinical
training program at Shree Mumbadevi Homeopathic Hospital are welcome
to contact me at vijay@drvaishnav.com.
Dr. Vaishnav's webite www.drvaishnav.com
|