| Obviously the physician needs all the available
evidence of disease before attempting to
prescribe. We are very prone to rely more on the finer or subjective
symptoms that our
allopathic friends, who lean more upon the coarser or objective
one, including the laboratory
findings. The earnest student soon realises that disease is really
and primarily internal and
superphysical. If it were not so, it would not show an inherent
tendency to externalise itself,
irregularity of evolution being essentially individualistic. Such
deviations mar the whole life
current of the individual and vary from complete objectivity to
great mental activity; indeed
a careful review of the whole life history may be the only usable
method if we wish to
clarify and make workable the disease problem.
In spite of the many artifices and inventions by which we try
to peer into the internal
workings of the human economy the results have been fragmentary
and meager compared
with the picture which nature herself automatically exhibits for
our inspection, the totality or
symptom complex. It is colourful, expressive and individualistic
in action or repose, calling
to its simile that harmony may ensue in the expenditure of energy.
It is one thing to assemble all the diverse symptoms of disease,
but quite another to be
able to pick out those peculiar ones which also interpenetrate the
others. Hahnemann said
that a paucity of symptoms or the presence of an overshadowing one
points toward
suppression. Here the life force seems able to show only a faint
sign, as it were, of its
distress. We see such things in shock, fulminating diseases, cholera,
the passage of calculi,
etc. The test of your homeopathy comes upon you when you contact
such conditions. Then,
unless you know your Arnica, Camphor, Cuprum, Veratrum album
or Polygonum
sagittatum it will be just too bad. Such outstanding single
symptom groups occasionally
have a concomitant of decisive import, such as happened in a case
of hip joint disease, with
shortening, in a highly tubercular family. The patient was pale,
proud and exacting;
Arsenicum cured and there remains no contraction.
Time allowance does not always permit of consulting books of reference,
as happened
recently in the instance of a feeble child with whooping cough;
it suddenly developed
generalised pleurisy of a severe type. It was either the similimum
given promptly or an early
death. She awoke in anger, breathed with the greatest pain and the
alae nasi moved in and
out convulsively. In four hours after a dose of Lycopodium she started
to sweat profusely and
was out of danger by the next day. Most articles on pleurisy fail
to even mention this
remedy.
For two weeks a workman tried vainly to pass a kidney stone, whereupon
he
showed great debility. He then appealed to me. He was of mediocre
intelligence and
was not easily questioned. Two drops of tincture of Polygonum sagittatum
taken in
water night and morning enabled him to pass a stone of about half
the size of a grain
of corn. He quickly became active and robust looking again.
We are often compelled to choose the remedy from the standpoint
of diagnosis, much as
this should be avoided because of the numerous pitfalls sure to
be encountered. Hahnemann
did the same thing, however, when he saw the similarity between
the effects of cinchona
bark and typical malaria, between the action of Belladonna and the
smooth type of scarlet
fever, or later in life when he pointed out the resemblance of the
effects of Camphor,
Cuprum and Veratrum album to three different types of cholera.
When in 1830 he
recommended the use of Mercurius corrosivus in dysentery he certainly
matched up the
main features both of the disease and the drug effects. The finer
distinctions upon which
other remedies had previously been pre-scribed were relegated to
a secondary place in
favour of the coarser disease as well as drug effects. Even here
we must not be too hasty in
concluding that the sublimate is the certain and specific remedy
for dysentery, because there
will occur epidemics whose side symptoms will point so clearly to
another drug that we dare
not omit its use.
The early treatment of diphtheria shows the use of many remedies,
always a sign of
uncertainty from a therapeutic standpoint. Now we know that Lachesis,
Lycopodium,
Phytolacca or Mercury cyanide suffice for most cases. The latter
started out from a frankly
pathological effect and its use has been further expanded by empirical
experiences, the latest
being its use in Vincent's angina.
We are supposed to prescribe upon the totality of the symptoms,
but as a matter of fact
this is not always feasible, mainly because the human mind does
not readily act in a
comprehensive way, but is given to observing some detail or other
to the neglect of the other
factors. Nor is this an age of growing refinement, but rather of
general stress and strain
which reflects itself in the sick, where trauma, nervous distress,
suppression, blood pollution
and narcotism are much in evidence. The picture is not a reassuring
one and makes our work
harder, but homeopathy here, as often before, is rising to the occasion
and proving its merit.
One more thought. Unless acute disease becomes dangerous or throws
upon the screen
some individualistic indication it generally should not be interfered
with. Ultimately the
constitutional peculiarity is bound to reveal itself in a form pointing
clearly to its remedial
counterpart. Nature calls for relief in her own language, which
it behoves us to learn, rather
than to distort by our own predilections or too often only educated
prejudices.
I might amplify this subject almost interminably, but it would
all come to this: that the
significant indication may appear in any sphere whatsoever. Preferably
it is contained within
the symptom picture but many times we are forced to look for it
elsewhere. Here the finest
discrimination is needful if we wish to attain success.
PARKERSBURG, W VA
|