In medicine the term suppression is ordinarily understood
to mean the forcible removal
of some effect or symptom by external measures, regardless of the
welfare of the patient.
Such measures are the destruction of parasites, excision of the
tonsils, cutting away of piles,
the application of liniments and countless other procedures. In
a broader sense it includes
everything that distorts the natural image of disease and as such
may be incidental and is
moreover not always confined to any one method of practice.
As comparatively few men are privileged to see the powerful reactions
which belong to
homoeopathic experience, it is not strange that much therapeutic
nihilism should prevail,
hence a many look to preventive measures or the pure recuperative
powers of nature for
help. This, is also largely responsible for much makeshift practice,
with the consequence
that the normal course of disease is rarely observed and its lessons
are therefore lost. It is to
be observed that the laity has learned much by often seeing unaided
nature do better work
than meddlesome physic. This has operated as a great and beneficent
check upon certain
methods of practice.
The homeopath who once sees the indicated remedy upset his cherished
notions of
prognosis will be very slow to surrender its power for any palliative
whatever It is a great
pity that every practising physician can not be brought to see at
least one true homeopathic
cure.
If it be true that similar causes bring about like effects, and
we once admit that a similar
acting remedy has ever cured a single patient, we thereby acknowledge
the universality of
the law and should cease trying hypothetical treatments: based upon
speculative diagnosis.
The human body is a great storehouse of potential energy which it
is our business to
direct when ever its expenditure becomes irregular or inharmonious.
No man can do this by
confining it, first here then there; for life exists by expression
and its pent up internal forces
will irresistibly destroy their container when treated thus. Knowing
this the true physician
realizes that every real cure proceeds outwardly and a symptom is
the external reflex of an
internal distress, the stamp of which it bears.
The habit of every cell in the human body is determined by the
central nervous system,
and it in turn is governed by the soul; therefore every disease
has its mental phase, in which
it stands rooted and grounded. The nervous system of itself acts
largely automatically,
regulating the life forces and expenditures, but it in turn is governed
by the soul whose acts
are all voluntary, but while it is quiescent the former acts automatically
in a dynamic
manner.
As cure commonly means the removal of some evil, distress or disability,
its scope is
broad and its attainment idealistic. What seems a cure to-day we
may tomorrow know as a
recovery only; for it is one thing to hold the vital forces well
in hand, but quite another to
eradicate disease.
While cleanliness has done much to limit new accretions to psora,
syphilis and sycosis,
it has accomplished nothing toward removing the death stamp which
these miasms have
fixed upon the human cell for thousands of generations; nor will
it. Only a similarly acting
non selfpropogating substance can stimulate the cell to throw off
these poisons which have
fastened themselves upon it and which daily ripen a rich harvest
for the surgeon and the
undertaker.
The common treatment of gonorrhoea is particularly pernicious
in firmly implanting the
sycotic miasms. It is a case of continuous suppression from the
start, each step being more
insidiously destructive until death closes the scent When we know
how easily this infection
passes from tissue to tissue, and how its presence excites rapid
cell proliferation, we should
beware of suppressing it or treating it lightly. How many women
have been sterilised
directly or indirectly by this poison? How many go to the operating
table for the removal of
its effects?
The many phases of psora can be met in but one way, by the similar
remedy. Nor will a
single drug ever meet all of them. hence a careful study of the
"Chronic Diseases" of
Hahnemann is most necessary if we wish to do the most good; always
bearing in mind that
the mind puts its stamp upon every symptom, and to do the very best
work we must be able
to see the imprint. It is true that this task is not always easy;
for many conditions necessarily
come on with an absence of mental phenomena. Then the task may be
still more difficult;
but we must train our minds to observe the slightest deviations
from the normal, for it is the
irregularities of disease that furnish us with the surest clue to
the indicated remedy, hence
the cure.
DISCUSSION
D. A. Williams: It is a difficult matter to discuss
a paper like this of Dr. Boger's for while it is interesting, it
does not tell a great deal about suppression. It is rather an indefinite
thing; there are a lot of us who think that we see suppression at
times, but would be unable to offer satisfactory proof of it to
another. Very often the statement is made that there is suppression
present in a case when the fact asserted is open to much doubt.
Suppression certainly does occur, but I think that it is too loosely
claimed to be present when it may not be.
One of my early experiences showed me that such a thing was possible;
I had a baby
who seesawed between asthmatic bronchitis and eczema. I would use
all sorts of outward
applications for the skin trouble and it would disappear, but bronchitis
immediately made its
appearance. Then I would suppress the bronchitis and get the eczema
again. I took this case
to Dr. Wm. Wesselhoeft and he suggested a remedy which I gave and
the whole illness
cleared up and the baby had neither the skin trouble nor the bronchial
affection. It is
frequently said to young graduates, you must not do this or you
must not do that on account
of the danger of producing a suppression, but I do not come across
so very many cases of
suppression. Perhaps my own mental view of the case is not deep
enough to see a
suppression where others would claim they saw it.
President: I call attention to the fact that
all visiting physicians are cordially invited to take part in the
discussions of this meeting.
W. H. Freeman: Those of us who always make a
careful study of cases will be able to see the results of suppression
and should be able to demonstrate its existence to others in nearly
all chronic conditions, although it takes years of experience and
conscientious case study to reach the point where we can always
recognise it in all its various forms.
It is usually very difficult to make others see or believe in
that which we see so clearly,
however; and usually they are unwilling to see or acknowledge its
existence, possibly for the
reason that such would force the acknowledgement of wrong methods
of treatment which,
for reason of expediency they may be decidedly unwilling to change.
Suppression is satisfactorily demonstrated in all cases where the
similimum removes
present symptoms after which there is a return of some old condition
that had existed
preceding the app1ication of suppressive agents.
G. B. Stearns: I believe that every case of chronic
disease is a case of suppression, not necessarily a suppression
from drugs, although often so. If we consider disease from a basic
or perhaps better to say, very general standpoint, we may be able
to see this. The organism of the patient makes an effort to overcome
every acute condition of ill-health. If that is not completely overcome,
a disordered condition is left, which is not at the time expressed
by symptoms, and the foundation of chronic disease is being laid.
To that extent it is a suppression. If there is any outside element
or influence that interferes with the reaction of the system to
the disease, you get further suppression, whether that interfering
element be a drug, cord, warmth or what not. It is all suppression.
Richard S. True: We must remember that effects
are not always immediate and that we miss evidence of a fact because
we do not give enough time for it to occur, often interfering with
it ourselves by impatient use of another remedy. I agree with Dr.
Stearn's views of suppression.
W. H. Freeman: I have in mind a case well illustrating
this subject of suppression: A young married man consulted me about
five years ago for intestina1 indigestion which my prescription
failed to relieve. He then consulted his former physician who evidently
relieved the condition by suppressive measures.
Very soon afterward, he became afflicted with tic douliereaux
and was unsuccessfully
treated for nearly a year by several of the best known nerve specialists
in New York. After
the expenditure of hundreds of dollars without obtaining a particle
of relief, he again
consulted me on the advice of a relative.
His symptoms aside from the pain in the right face and nostril
were meagre and lacking
in peculiar characteristics. Both Dr. Stuart Close and Dr. J. B.
Campbell treated him in
addition to myself for several months without success and it was
only after I had selected
kali-carb. on the single symptom—"pain in nose extending
to occiput," that he began to
improve and finally there was a complete cessation of the tic, but
a return of the original
intestinal symptom which cleared up after giving him natrum sulph.
Edith Phelps: What was the potency and the dose
used?
W. H. Freeman: Kali-c. 200,1 m., 10 m. and 45
m. Nat-s., 1 m., 10 m. and 45 m.
President: If there are not others desiring to
discuss this paper I will call on Dr. Boger to close.
C. M. Boger: In closing I desire to say that
I approve fully Dr. Stearn's remarks; he has a very interior and
coned view of disease. Everything about suppression depends upon
how you rook upon health, or rather upon life. Life itself is a
free expression and everything that restrains that expression, especially
by outward means, partakes of the nature of a suppression. In giving
a homoeopathic remedy we are trying to remove symptoms just as nature
is trying to do, not opposing her efforts as suppressive measures
do. The disease that is producing disorder of the internal organs
is often also the cause of the same disease when it appears on the
skin; it is simply working on a different plane. Usually such a
miasm requires an antipsoric remedy to remove it.
|