The treatment of the various phases of tuberculosis
is dependent upon so many factors direct
and contingent, that it embraces a large part of medical science.
This paper will not therefore
attempt a general resume of the subject but rather review some special
considerations.
The prognosis in a given case is so closely bound up in the anamnesis,
the present state
including the surrounding, the reactive power of the organism and
the treatment that a just
estimate of the outcome presents unusual difficulties. In this connection
it may be well to point
out the great importance which necessarily attaches to the relative
chest capacity, for upon it
depends the oxidising power of the whole organism with all its metabolic
changes.
That cases do get well with the aid or in spite of treatment,
or with no attention at all seems
well established; but nature carries on her weeding out process
most relentlessly when left to
herself or when help is clumsily applied. Therefore it seems superfluous
to say that all aid should
take the most enlightened form; its specific application from a
hygienic, climatic or dietetic point
of view may well be left to the experts in this line while this
paper will look the matter over from
a therapeutic standpoint.
The curative power of remedies depends upon the very same elements
that go to make up the
prognosis, the chief one being vital reaction, closely followed
by the nature and character of the
anamnesis. This being true, the drugs curative in a given case must
of necessity include in their
pathogeneses as a primary action a similitude to the latest characteristic
symptoms of the patient
Should it so happen that the secondary drug symptoms of the remedy
administered also
correspond to the earlier or dyscratic disease manifestations of
the case in hand its curative power
will extend along the entire line of disease effects and root them
out fundamentally, often
uncovering the basic dyscrasia upon the soil of which the tubercular
.process thrives. Most cases
for various reasons do not present a picture clear enough for so
sweeping a prescription. Then we
are obliged to remove successive groups until the same end is attained,
in act for reasons into
which we will not enter here this is often the only safe procedure.
As will be seen from the above no one remedy can be looked upon
as specific for any one
disease. The search for specifics is for many reasons fundamentally
fallacious; the principal one
being that they are supposed to cure diseases, while in reality
it is necessary to cure patients and
not disease. It is no argument to say that certain medicines have
cured such affections. The very
fact that percentage is admitted into the discussion, vitiates all
figures and puts the matter without
the pale of a true scientific demonstration. This fact is very slowly
but nevertheless surely finding
its way among those that think and are not ruled by preconceived
ideas.
The factors which play the chief diagnostic role hold a subordinate
place in the choice of the
curative remedy, although medicines whose pathogeneses point to
them, may be used as a broad
class from which those lacking the characteristics of the patient,
may be dropped by a process of
elimination until the symptom picture resembles that of the patient
in a greater or less degree.
Thus, Kyphosis, often but not necessarily due to tuberculosis, points
toward Acon., Asaf., Aur.,
Bar c., Bell., Bry., Calc., Caust., Cic., Clem., Col., Dul., Hep.,
Ipec., Lach., Lyc., Mer, Met,
Phosac., Plb., Puls., Rhusu., Ruta., Sab., Sep., Sil., Staph., Sul.,
and Thuja.
It is well known that sweats are apt to localize themselves over
the affected organ, and in the
pulmonary form they often show their presence quite early on the
thorax. Of the above remedies
the following have chest sweats; Bell., Calc., Hep., Ipe., Lyc.,
Mer., Phos., Phos ac., Plb“ Rhus.,
Sep., Sil. This measurably reduces the number from which the choice
may be made, always
bearing in mind that the final resemblance between the drug effect
and the disease picture of the
patient, must present certain points of harmony called the "conditions"
of the case, in which all
kinds of external influences such as heat, cold, light, dampness
etc., go to make up the
differentiating shades in the final analysis.
We also take into consideration the subjective symptoms: resting
as they do upon the
comprehension and interpretation of the patient as well as of the
physician, they require the nicest
judgement and most careful discrimination to strip them of all superfluities
and exuberances of
expression on the one hand, as well as proper amplification' and
interpretation on the other. This
is after all the crux of the art of prescribing and stamps the physician
either as a rank empiric or a
painstaking scientist.
Whether the subjective phenomena express erethism or depression
is an important
differentiating point and divides the remedies of the materia into
two great classes. Finally the
state of the mind gives the last clue for the selection of the most
suitable remedy, which if given
in a single dose of the appropriate potency will unfailingly bring
about the reaction so necessary
for our purpose.
Following these lines the treatment of tubercular bone disease,
periostitis, especially of the
ribs or maxillae, Pott's disease, etc., has yielded the most brilliant
results and services of the
surgeon have rarely been needed; the particular remedies most in
use for such conditions have
been Silicea and Aurum, especially when fistulous tendencies have
become manifest: Calcarea
fluorica, where very hard bony exostoses have been present, and
Phosphorus in rickety children.
The list might be greatly extended to cover special indications
but that is unnecessary, the main
point being that the indications m each case be carefully elicited
after which the choice of the
proper curative remedy is not so difficult.
The meningeal has perhaps been justly regarded as the most intractable
form of tuberculosis,
but even here we are not without considerable hope and many cases
have been cured with the
indicated remedy; the choice will usually lie between Apis., Bell.,
Calc., Calc phos., Hell., Phos.,
Sulfur and Tuberculinum, all of which have a number of cures to
their credit, some of which I
have personally witnessed. In this form it is always well to make
the diagnosis as certain as may
be under the circumstances; in a suspected case coming under my
notice, with somewhat
equivocal symptoms a microscopical examination of the spinal fluid
cleared matters up by
showing the presence of gonococci.
The glandular infections have most frequently called for, Bell.,
Calc fluor., Hep., Staph., Sil.,
and Sul. In growing children they present little difficulty and
very few cases are incurable; in
adults they are more intractable but many brilliant successes attest
the efficacy of this method.
The pulmonary type outnumbers all the others and is for many reasons
one of the hardest to
control. Its victims are notoriously inconstant, they do not readily
submit themselves
unreservedly to the care of their physician and are always willing
to take all kinds of nostrums
and apply the most unheard of measures, which of necessity negatives
much if not all that the
doctor may do. In a general way I would lay down the rule that unless
implicit obedience can be
exacted, the case had better be dismissed, not perhaps as incurable
but rather as intractable,
therefore incurable. This the predominant form calls for all the
skill at our command and I am
very happy to say that our therapeutic method often yields the most
brilliant results when the law
is carefully and thoroughly applied. Among the remedies which stand
out most prominently in
my mind's eye, none exceeds in results the effects which I have
seen from the administration of
Iodide of Arsenic. But even here, it is to be borne in mind that
tuberculosis is a complex
dyscrasia and will hardly yield to a single remedy however closely
its symptomatology may fit
the patient's symptom, complex; although admittedly such may occasionally
be the case, for once
I saw a complete recovery and at another time what seemed also a
restoration of health from the
administration of Belladonna only.
To review the general treatment would be to repeat much that has
already been said. The
patient's condition may call for any remedy in the materia medica
and when a medicine is
thoroughly indicated it is not possible in the present state of
our knowledge to fortell just how
much good may come of it, as occasionally the most hopeless looking
cases have made very
wonderful recoveries from the administration of the similimum. lt
does not therefore become us
to give up hope too soon but rather to cover every phase of a given
case with the most careful and
searching investigation and from the information thus gleaned prescribe
with the full assurance
that from a medicinal standpoint the very best has been done.
|