| The successive sicknesses of one individual bear
enough resemblance to clearly show that each human entity reacts
to disturbances in its own particular way. Ordinarily the connection
is not self observed, for of all things bodily afflictions are soonest
forgotten. Again the very violence of acute disease tends to obscure
the deeper lying manifestations which best portray the dyscratic
outcroppings which are the more helpful of all to the prescriber.
After an acute disease explosion these submerged symptoms again
slowly emerge from their hiding, finally showing themselves to be
part and parcel of a deeply imbedded miasm which can only be eradicated
by the most careful prescribing. He who fails to realise this will
always be curing but never cure. In his aimless wandering about
amongst symptoms he will only add confusion to the picture, the
more so because he failed to make the right start.
Much as we need our acute remedies the prescriber uses them less
as he grows in his
work. He realises that acute excitations of the vital economy may
be menacing enough to
demand theft employment, but at the same time expects to shortly
follow them with others
of deeper action. This is somewhat reminiscent of certain allopathic
practices, but entails
none of their baneful after-effects; on the contrary it clears the
ground, bringing into
stronger relief the indications for the succeeding remedy.
The finding of and giving the proper antipsoric has quite a few
limitations. The
anamnesis may be unavailable, the status praesens may have few and
obscure symptoms or
be loaded down with a multitude of trivialities taxing the ingenuity
of the examiner at every
step and unless he is a man of accurate habits of observation he
is almost sure to fail in
making correct deductions. Not all physicians have built up sufficiently
their deductive and
reasoning powers and must perforce be shown the actual and close
correspondence between
the clinical and pathogenetic pictures. Such realists rarely make
homeopathists of the first
rank, largely because of the type of their previous education which
has not been of a nature
to amuse their powers of imagination, for in actual practice there
is always some-thing to be
inferred in every clinical case.
Repeated translations and transcriptions of the materia medica
texts have almost
insensibly altered the finer shades of meaning so essential to a
correct understanding of the
various remedies. This is not for the best as each record should
be much more than just a
bald outline of facts stripped of their vital setting, for it is
this that constitutes the living
appeal, as it were, and builds up the ground colour of disease pictures,
be they clinical or
pathogenetic. The older men were much concerned over the sifting
process of symptom
verification, thereby showing themselves fully alive to the uncertain-ties
of symptom
production. Hahnemann himself, although he had through long application
acquired the
ability to grasp the essence of each prover's statements, spoke
of Nenning's symptom
factory, even while admitting many of the latter's observations
to his own compilation. We
now know them to have the highest value.
Personally I feel it a mistake to use only educated provers be-cause
some of the most
virile and expressive relations come from minds of rather mediocre
equipment, be they
patients or provers. A spontaneous expression unmodified by definition
is always the most
valuable. This is especially striking in the homoeopathic treatment
of infants and children
where self-interpretation is almost wholly absent.
What then should be our attitude in general toward disease? If
we visualise it as a
disturbance of the normal vibratory rate of the human entity, starting
in the vital force, that
compact of energy which rules our well being, the conclusion is
inevitable that each
separate sickness which we must suffer must also bear the stamp
of the whole and must be
regarded and treated as such, i.e., from the central to the more
external, from above
downward and in the reverse order of its appearance; the first shall
be last and the last first,
here also.
Whether we realise it or not, we are externalised thought and
thought habits are the
surest guides to the indicated remedy. In our thoughts lies the
first and most fertile source of
our every attitude; they colour the meaning of every symptom, just
as intonation governs the
meaning of words, more so in some languages than others.
The original Materia Medica Pura of Hahnemann contains but relatively
few conditions
of aggravation and amelioration, leaving us to infer that originally
they were used much less
than now, although Bönninghausen was quick to add this helpful
factor to our working
knowledge of the remedies. Hahnemann himself evidently depended
upon combined
symptom expression for his guide and when dear and distinct it rarely
needs the help of the
modalities.
One more point: the primary elements of a given clinical picture
are ordinarily not found
in the same combination in the pure pathogenesis, but must be pieced
together from the
symptoms contained in several provings, which means that no one
person can possibly show
the whole clinical picture of any one disease nor can he exhibit
all the phases of action of
any one drug, but either complex will contain within its scope some
of the essentials of the
distress under which it labours.
PARKERSBURG, W. VA.
DISCUSSION
Dr. Grimmer: This paper is one that brings us
great light on the basic principles of our school. There is not
much to discuss except to confirm what the doctor brought out clearly,
and what Hahnemann and the true disciples brought out expressing
the necessity for the menta1 states as being paramount over all
others in the guidance to the selection of our remedies. That is
what the doctor is trying to bring out. If we get the spirit, the
menta1 picture that is only to be read between the lines, any other
remedies have not been sufficiently proved in that one individual,
or one proving is not sufficient.
We need provings and reprovings over a wider group to develop
these remedies of ours
and then we will be able to make even better prescriptions.
Another point which I liked very much, and which every man out
in practice finds, the
longer he is out the less attention he pays to the acute explosions.
He depends on the deep
action. At times the severity of the acute case may compel you to
palliate and carry them
over, but in the deep constitutional remedies of which the doctor
has given you the key, you
will find lie the secret of real cure.
Dr. Roberts: I was very much interested in Dr.
Boger's idea that only part of the symptomatology is expressed in
one individual, and not the total. It seems to me there is a very
great truth that we must bear in mind.
Dr. Boger: There isn't much to say in closing.
I might quote one case to you which will show you how important
the analysis of this undeveloped picture sometimes is. Not long
ago I was sent for to see a patient who had a strange sensation
in the back of her head and very pronounced incoordination and nausea.
She habitually carries a very high blood pressure, in the neighbourhood
of 230. There is no repertory that I know of that you can group
into and find the rubric "incoordination." There may be
one, but if I hadn't had the repertory at hand to find that at once,
I would have been in a bad fix because a patient in that state is
rarely in shape to give much information. Fortunately, I had my
rubric ready and gave her a single dose of Nux vomica 180. In less
than an hour a sweat set in and she was relieved.
She had recurrence in a week and another dose of Nux vomica set
her right and since
then she has only had mild recurrence. She is gradually passing
from that phase of the
matter. What the next will be, I don't know, and you don't, nor
anybody else.
|