| The third aphorism [The Organon by Samuel
Hahnemann, MD] states:
If the physician clearly perceives what
is to be cured in diseases, that is to say, in every individual
case of disease (knowledge of disease, indication), if he clearly
perceives what is curative in medicines, that is to say, in each
individual medicine (knowledge of medical powers), and if he knows
how to adapt, according to clearly defined principles, what is curative
in medicines to what he has discovered to be undoubtedly morbid
in the patient, so that the recovery must ensue - to adapt it, as
well in respect to the suitability of the medicine most appropriate
according to its mode of action to the case before him (choice of
the remedy, the medicine indicated), as also in respect to the exact
mode of preparation and quantity of it required (proper dose), and
the proper period for repeating the dose; - if, finally, he knows
the obstacles to recovery in each case and is aware how to remove
them, so that the restoration may be permanent, then he understands
how to treat judiciously and rationally, and he is a true practitioner
of the healing art .
In the first aphorism, Hahnemann discussed the aim of a physician
(to cure). In the second aphorism, he discussed what is an ideal
cure and in the third aphorism, Hahnemann lists the tools
that a physician needs to treat and cure his patients.
If you are asked to hit a target with a bullet, the first piece
of information that you will need is 'what is the target?'. Then
you will need to have a gun and some bullets at hand and last but
the most important, you must know how to fire a gun precisely. Similarly,
when you have to treat a patient, the first piece of information
that you need is - what is it that you need to treat?
Is it the symptoms, the pathogen, the pathology, the nosological
disease or the person as a whole? Hahnemann says that you have to
know what is curable in 'every individual case of disease'.
This means that the focus of our treatment should be the individual
who has the 'disease'. Now this causes confusion for many. People
think that they have to focus all their attention on the 'person',
the 'individual', and often ignore the disease. People will say
- 'This patient needs Calc-carb because she is fat, fair and
flabby' or 'This patient needs Sulphur because he sits
with stooped shoulders'. Unless the remedy covers the symptoms
of the disease process, such prescriptions are not justified. You
do not have to study the person excluding his disease state.
You have to find a remedy which best covers the disease process,
the pathology, the individualizing symptoms and the personal/constitutional
traits. And for this you have to study the person with the
disease picture. And then you have to differentiate one patient
suffering from a particular disease, from other patients suffering
from 'similar' condition, using the causative factors, individualizing
characteristics of the case and the rare, peculiar and uncommon
symptoms. If a person comes to you with malaria like symptoms, you
will not give her Calc-carb because she is 'timid, irresolute
and fat'. You will first find out medicines which cover the patient's
disease process, be it acute or chronic, and then you will study
the patient for the individualizing characteristics - 'What is it
that differentiates this patient of Malaria from other similar patients?'.
So the first piece of information that you need for curing a patient
is a thorough knowledge of the disease process and individualization.
So now you know what is your target and you need a gun and some
ammunition to fire. You will need to know what are the types of
guns available in the market, what are the bullet sizes available,
what ammunition fits which gun and what is the range and precision
of a particular gun. In medical terms, you need to have the knowledge
of the medicines that you will need to target the disease
process. You will need to know what medicines are available, what
symptoms and conditions they cover (range and precision), and how
to differentiate one medicine from other medicines producing similar
symptoms. This means that you should have a good command over Materia
Medica. These days students often become so dependent on repertories
and computer software for finding the remedy that they often do
not give enough time for studying our Materia Medica. Repertory
is a tool that can help us select a 'group of possible remedies'.
It is not necessary that every time the medicine that gets most
points in repertorization will be the right one for your patient.
You have to use your knowledge of Materia Medica
to select the best remedy from this 'group of possible remedies'.
Now you know your target and you know about the guns, all you need
now is the knowledge of firing a gun. It looks simple - just pick
a gun, keep in front of the target and fire! But it is not as simple
as it sounds. This is where the 'art' in homeopathy begins.
You need to know which gun is suitable for this targe. What is the
range that you have to fire from? If your target is a small circle,
you will need a precision rifle, if your target is a dummy, you
will probably need a pistol and if your target is an army, you will
probably need a machine gun! Similarly, you have to match the medicine
with your target (the simillimum) - the disease process. You have
to find out the most suitable remedy for the case at hand and then
use it properly to eradicate the disease process and restore the
health.
But a medicine does not become a 'simillimum' for a case just because
the symptoms match. A medicine will assist in curing a case only
if -
- The symptoms match.
- The potency matches the intensity of the presentation and the
totality of the case.
- The dose, which includes the potency, form and quantity of
medicine are appropriate.
- The medicine is repeated appropriately.
Each of these points needs further elaboration. I will offer some
brief insights here.
Prescribing homeopathy medicines looks easy in the begriming. All
you have to do is list the symptoms of the patient, find a medicine
which covers most of them and 'Boom!!', a magical cure will take
place!! But in reality, it is not that simple. Not all the symptoms
are of equal importance. You need to understand what are the common
symptoms of the nosological disease, what are the uncommon symptoms
that this particular patient is manifesting and what are the personality
traits. The symptoms need to be analyzed and evaluated before they
can be used for finding the right remedy. I you
pick the wrong symptoms, you get the wrong remedy. The choice of
the medicine and dose will also depend upon your aim - whether you
wish to palliate or cure.
After the remedy is selected, you also need to choose the
right potency. If the medicine is the amplitude of a wave,
then the potency is the inherent frequency of the wave. Choice of
potency depends upon a multitude of factors and it is not possible
to go into those details here. If you wish to learn more about potency
selection, you can refer to another essay by me, titled Homeopathy
Posology.
After the potency is selected, we also need to decide the
dose, which includes the form and the quantity
of medicine. We need to decide whether we wish to give
the medicine as dry sugar pills, liquid potency, water based liquid
solutions, sugar of milk etc. We also need to decide the quantity
of the medicine that will constitute one dose - it can be one small
globule or four, it can be a drop of potency or a spoonful of liquid
solution. The potency and the dose also needs to be individualized.
Now we come to the judicious repetition. Often
(not always), a single dose of the right medicine would not be enough
to bring about a radical cure, unless the case is at functional
level and the patient has strong vitality. We will need to repeat
the medicine at appropriate intervals depending upon the reaction
that we generate from our initial doses. The repetition also depends
upon the scale (decimal, centesimal or LM) and the form chosen.
All this needs very good understanding of case management.
Majority of our cases fail not because we are unable to find the
simillimum, but because we are unable to manage our cases well after
the first prescription.
Another important but often overlooked aspect of this aphorism
is 'the exact mode of preparation'.
Many times I have come across cases that have not responded to a
remedy from a particular pharmacy but did very well when the same
remedy was ordered from other pharmacy. The quality of our
medicines does matter. Today homeopathic remedies are prepared
by a variety of methods - by hands, mechanical hammers, electronic
machines, electronic vibrators. Some of these methods, especially
ones which do not use any back potencies, are very doubtful and
you should always use medicines from a good and reputable pharmacy.
So now you have the knowledge of the disease and the knowledge
of the medicine. Plus you have also decided the right potency and
dose. There might still be many cases which will not show a curative
response even with the simillimum. If you do not address
the causative, contributing and maintaining factors for
a disease condition, even your right remedy will not be able to
bring about a radical cure. The patient will improve and relapse.
Suppose a patient comes to you with fibrosis of oral mucosa and
is addicted to tobacco chewing, you won't be able to help much even
with the right remedy because the tobacco will work as a maintaining
factor. Same will happen in a case of allergic bronchitis, if the
person is a heavy smoker. If a person with acute spinal disc prolapse
or sciatica is not suggested bed rest, the physical exertion and
trauma will work as an aggravating factor and your remedy will not
give the desired results. If the causative factor for backache is
a bad posture or an uncomfortable chair, the pain won't go away
unless you remove the causative factor. If there is a corn in a
foot due to a shoe that bites, the corn won't go away even when
you administer a remedy, till the person changes his shoes. If a
wife or a child suffers from psychological trauma due to abuse or
family situations, the remedy will not bring about a radical cure
unless the abuse stops or the causative situation changes. Occasionally
it might happen that the right remedy may give a person enough courage
or insight to resolve a problem relationship or situation. But that
is not going to happen always. Our life style, food habits, relationships
often work as causative and maintaining factors for our sickness.
Unless and until the doctor understands these factors well and knows
how to remove them, he will be unable to cure a large majority of
his patients.
So in the end, I would like to enumerate the tools that are essential
to cure a sick person. A good physician must have the -
- Knowledge of Disease and Individualization.
- Knowledge of Materia Medica.
- Knowledge of laws and methods by which he can apply the knowledge
of medicines to his knowledge of disease process. These include:
- Remedy selection
- Potency and dose selection
- Repetition
- Knowledge of causative and maintaining factors
If you develop a good understanding of all these variables, you
will be able to perform many 'ideal' cures!
----------------------------------------
Dr. Manish Bhatia |