Miasms in The Modern World
After Hahnemann, many homeopaths have suggested that since miasms
are disease syndromes, there can be more miasms that psora, syphilis
and sycosis. The concept is to look for diseases which leave a diseased
state in the body even after apparent recovery, especially after
suppression. In this regard, the following miasms have been proposed
so far:
- Tubercular J. H. Allen
- Vaccinosis Dr. Burnett
- Cancer
- Malaria R. Sankaran
- Ringworm R. Sankaran
- Typhoid R. Sankaran
- Leprosy R. Sankaran
- Smallpox
The understanding and approach of those who have put forward newer
miasms is varied and at odds with Hahnemann's ideas as well. Such
differences arise from a different understanding and approach to
the disease process. As a result of this the world of miasms has
become more chaotic.
Now I will pick up 3 modern authors Vithoulkas, Sankaran, and
Vijayakar and probe into their approach and understanding of chronic
miasms.
George Vithoulkas
George Vithoulkas does not fall into the trap of whether miasms
are bacteria or simple predisposition to disease. According to him
it can be both a predisposition acquired through a suppressed
disease or other strong influences on the vital force like vaccination,
strong emotional or mental shocks OR a predisposition which is inherited
from parents.
Vithoulkas defines miasms as:
A miasm is a predisposition towards chronic disease underlying
the acute manifestation of an illness
- Which is transmissible from generation to generation
- Which may respond beneficially to the corresponding nososde
prepared from either pathological tissue or from the appropriate
drug or vaccine.
He also says:
any homeopath who has studied the course of degeneration
of patients over a long period of time can attest to the presence
of a large number of miasms.
Vithoulkas believes that miasms appear as layers (of suppression?)
in chronic cases, which need to be peeled one by one through medicines
based on the totality of symptoms. Also Vithoulkas believes that
any miasm can produce any pathology and the notion that tumors are
sycotic, ulcers are syphilitic etc is wrong. Except for the fact
that Vithoulkas considers there are many miasms, his approach to
the miasms is very classical.
|