Cellular Defense Mechanisms and their Miasmatic
Correlation
Vijaykar makes use of another well documented observation normal
physiology, molecular biology and immune function of a cell to describe
and authenticate Hahnemann’s Theory of Miasms. It is interesting
to understand the miasms from this perspective : an extrapolation
of well known biological mechanisms. I’ll outline in brief
these concepts below:
There are 3 basic Functions that an organism or
individual cell has evolved for Survival.
1. The first function of the cell is for nutrition
of self. Its basic functions are geared to acquire nutrition and
oxygen for survival.
2. The second basic function of a living organism
or a cellular unit is regeneration or reproduction. This ensures
survival of the Species.
3. The third basic function of a cell is the Immunity
that is evolved for protections against outside forces for both
the individual cell as well as the whole organism.
The importance of considering the changes that are occurring at
the cellular or tissue level is because this response is governed
by the genes, or genetic make up of the man as a whole. The disease
response and expression is governed by the genome in each individual
cell that is dependant on the genetic make up of that individual,
which can change at different times and different ‘states’
of the individual based on the hereditary (genetic) traits.
A normal cell responds to stressful stimuli in the environment
by certain genetically regulated functions (metabolism, differentiation,
specialization) in order to restore homeostasis. As the stress (pathological
stimulus) continues for a longer period of time, various physiological
and morphological adaptations begin to occur resulting in an altered
state of homeostasis. Some of these adaptations are cell hypertrophy,
cell atrophy or cell injury which may be reversible or can result
in final destruction.
There are conceptually 3 Defense Mechanisms a
cell employs for survival.
1. The Physiological Defense: the first line
of defense. Initially the cell tries to restore homeostasis at the
level of its cell wall by promoting production of lysozymes in mucous
membranes or unsaturated fatty acids on skin epithelium. These seek
to wash off irritants or bacteria or viruses. Ultimately if this
does not work, the Acute Inflammatory Response of the cells sets
into motion (Calor: heat, Rubor: redness, Dolor: pain, Tumor: swelling,
Functio-laesa: temporary absence of function) which tries to localize
the irritants, bacteria, virus, etc and get rid of its disease causing
influence on the body. This is the Acute Inflammatory Response which
is closely intermingled with the process of repair. While acute
inflammation works at limiting effect of the pathogens, it also
sets of a series of events that heal and reconstitute the damaged
tissues.
The Acute Inflammatory Processes in any organ involving the mucous
membranes or skin are typical expressions are what Vijaykar tems
"Physiological Defense".
2. The Morphological or “Constructive” Defense:
is the second line of defense. Ideally most of the Chronic Inflammatory
Process of the immune system come into at this stage. The observation
at the cellular (micro) and macro levels is the accumulation of
lipids or proteins or glycogen in cell walls or cytoplasm. Chronic
inflammatory processes all describe an accumulation of fluids, development
of chronic granulomas and healing with fibrous tissue accumulation
as part of the immune processes. These express as cysts, tumors,
excessive think discharges, pigment depositions, fibrous scarring.
3. The Destructive Defense: When chronic inflammatory
processes fail to stem the progress of disease and the pathogens,
the next line of defense is immune processes that cause local destruction
with the help of secial cells and enzymes secreted, in order to
“save the whole by sacrificing a part”. The change to
this type of defensive mechanism possibly occurs at the genetic
level of the cell – the change towards self destruction rather
than survival. These pathologies express as necrosis of parts or
gangrenes or ulcerations.
Organon Aphorisms 73, 79,
80 may be paralleled with the observations above. Psora is thus
– “Physiological Defense”, Sycosis is “Constructive
Defense", and Syphilis is “Destructive Defense”.
Psora includes the Acute Inflammatory response and other
physiological defenses that make use of and sacrifice the 1st basic
function of the cell, that of Nutrition. The resultant hypoxia and
Ischaemia leads to depletion of energy generation within the cell
affecting its long term functioning and health, (unless helped with
a similimum remedy). This expression can also be extrapolated in
the mental and emotional symptoms.
Sycosis includes defense processes that make use of or
sacrifice the 2nd basic function of the cell, that is its capacity
to regenerate/reproduce. Mitosis, meiosis, etc are these functions
that help in accumulations and growths. This tendency for protection
through deception and fortification is the Sycotic extrapolation
into the mental state.
Syphilis makes use of destructive Immune processes to
defend the organism or the cell. The immune function is the 3rd
basic function of the cell which may be sacrificed leading to destruction
– locally or at the general level. Auto-immune diseases, descructive
diseases of teh immune system or other part of the body are part
of this. Here too, mentally there is an expression of destruction,
loss of moral sense and perversion of the intellect.
Almost Every Disease process evolves in a particular direction:
It starts with acute inflammation (Psora) then progresses to chronic
inflammation and indurations (Sycosis) and finally towards ulceration
and destruction (Syphilis). (Aphorism 72).
Thus, we see a miasmatic evolution in every disease process, acute
or chronic during treatment. The extent the disease progresses is
determined by the basic miasmatic traits possessed by the individual
which are either acquired or inherited. One phase or state may be
predominant at a particular point of time. Observation and analysis
of the miasmatic evolution of disease in the life of each individual
patient, peceiving the miasmatic similimum or series of similimums
that would be required and recognizing a reversal of the miasmatic
progression towards health, is the hallmark of expert homeopathic
management. Observing this reversal is not by merely or simplistically
following Hering’s Nature’s Law of Cure, but being able
to perceive deeper the Miasmatic reversal towards cure. The choice
of remedy then has to be appropriated and be a similimum
for this purpose. Only then will we see true Cure in chronic complicated
diseases. We will explain this again more clearly with some examples.
Multi-Miasmatic Expression:
Almost every one of us has a multimiasmatic expression of disease.
This is because besides the miasms we may have acquired during our
lifetime, we have also an inherited miasmatic load that progresses
further with every suppressive treatment taken during ones lifetime.
Vijaykar details the various physical and mental facets of individual
miasmatic expression. That has already been covered in earlier articles
on miasms, especially the last one in the previous (May '05) issue.
His are valuable insights interpreted from his own experience, so
one should go through his book. I have mainly focussed on the clinical
relevance of these concepts for case management.
Every individual inherits his natural traits and characteristics
from his parents.These are in his genes. But not all these genes
are expressed in the normal characteristics of the individual. Some
genes remain dormant, while some are dominant. The dominant genes
are activated to produce and synthesize substances that express
the dominant characteristics. From the homeopathic standpoint too,
the individual inherits miasmatic traits (genetically based) from
his parents. He may have inherited a multimiasmatic expression,
but only the dominant miasm expresses itself, with the others lying
latent (Hahemann used the term "latent psora"!), having
the ability to be activated in the right set of circumstances. This
miasmatic load is also modified by miasmatic influences acquired
during a person's lifetime.
Vijaykar explains the process of growth, development and aging
as an expression of miasmatic evolution. The essential concept is
as follows:
The First Phase from Birth to about 20 years of
age normally present with complaints related to the Psoric miasm
- Skin problems, frequent colds, diarrheas, various repeated infections
that last a short while that helps develop the immune system. These
diseases are dealt with through "physiological defense"
systems. The mental state is one of learning, growing, working to
gain knowledge, satisfying ones basic needs of survival.
The Second Phase from about 20 years to 50 years
of age normally present with Sycotic complaints like backache, Rheumatoid
arthritis, psoriasis, tumors, fibroids, hypertension and diabetes.
The defenses have become accumulative or "constructive".
The mental state is expressed in the need to prosper, to accumulate
wealth and power, and to achieve. There is weight gain in general
signifying this move towards sycotic expression.
The Third Phase is after 50 years till death.
This phase is characterized by catabolism, and a process of destruction
that is normal to aging. But it also characterizes a Syphilitic
expression. Depending on the miasmatic load, the destructive process
sets in either at an earlier age in this phase or only very close
to death. A long life and uncomplicated old age is a sign of strong
Psoric miasmatic inheritance, which is the secret to a long life
of good vitality.
Of course, the miasmatic shift can occur at any time, and it is
the miasmatic background that has been inherited along with the
amount of stress in the environment that the individual is exposed
to that determines this.
Miasms in Hering's Law of Cure
Earlier we talked about Miasmatic evolution and Hering's Law of
Cure from the embryological perspective. Vijaykar adds one more
corollary to Hering's Law in order to bring in the miasmatic perspective:
The 5 directions of cure are:
1. From organs of more importance to organs of less importance
2. From Above Downwards
3. From Inside to Outside
4. From Center to Periphery
5. In the Chronological reverse order of disease development.
An additional Corollary is:
6. From a more destructive miasm or destructive process
towards one that is less destructive. I.e. Either from Syphilis
to Psora or Syphilis to Sycosis, or Sycosis to Psora.
A Clinical Example is the case of a man suffering form Leukemia.
While he was being treated with a remedy, his WBC count reduces,
which may have been a welcome sign, but along with this, his hemoglobin
level also began to fall. Leukemia has a Sycotic taint. The fall
in WBC is a good miasmatic sign, but the fall in Hemoglobin alongside
is an indication of destruction of bone marrow cells that also produce
RBC's. This would be a Syphilitic change towards a destructive defense
instead of the sycotic defense of leukemia. This was a wrong direction
of cure.
The case was revised and the correct antisycotic similimum was
found. After the second prescription, The haemoglobin increased.
But the number of leucocytes (WBC's) increased as well. From the
Miasmatic point of view, this was a good movement as the destructive
Syphilitic change has reverted back to a sycotic defense. Subsequently
there followed a decrease in the total WBC's while the hemoglobin
continued to improve. A subsequent differential WBC count revealed
that there was a definite reduction in the number of lymphocytes
(chronic inflammatory cells) with a corresponding increase in the
Neutrophil count (Acute inflammatory cells). Lab results over the
past year did not show any such change in the differential WBC count.
The sign of increased neutrophils, as against lymphocytes is a Psoric
expression.
This was a miasmatic indication of the correct direction of cure.
Besides other signs of Hering's law that were observed, here was
the miasmatic interpretation exhibiting a change from a Syphilitic
"Destructive defense" to a Sycotic "Constructive
Defense" onwards to a Psoric "Physiological Defense".
The remedy was a miasmatic similimum and was certain to completely
cure this patient.
Multimiasmatic Remedies
The multimiasmatic expression exists not only in an individual
but also in the remedy proving. As mentioned in my previous article,
it would have been interesting if Hahnemann has sought to record
proving symptoms giving importance to the miasmatic expression and
sequence of symptoms development. But he did not, and so we have
the added difficulty today of trying to understand our remedies
(especially the polycrest ones) from the multimiasmatic perspective.
This is a concept that the ICR symposium have worked on as well
in order to understand the different miasmatic expressions in polycrest
remedies. The importance of understanding remedies from the miasmatic
standpoint is that it helps us perceive a commonly used remedy in
an uncommon expression based on the predominant miasmatic expression.
The predominant miasm is one of the reasons why we see different
and uncommon facets of remedies in different individuals. One does
not write these off as "Polarities" simplistically. They
have a good reason to show one polarity - and often the explanation
is fond when we look deeper into the miasmatic expression of the
symptom picture as whole, the physical symptoms being most clearly
indicative of the stage of pathological progression.
In the previous article (Part II),
the multimiasmatic expression of Baryta Carb was explained from
a description given in the ICR Volumes.
Here is the remedy Opium miasmatically analyzed
by Dr. Vijaykar.
A Psoric Opium would have:
Physically
1. Epilepsy
2. Hyperacidity
3. Itching of the skin.
Mentally
1. He will be quick and witty
2. He will have easy comprehension
3. He will be easily frightened
4. He would have a good intellect and active memory
The Sycotic Opium would have:
Physically
1. Constipation
2. Ptosis of the eyelids
3. Dropsical condition of the body
Mentally
1. He would be slow and torporous
2. He would be a liar, deceitful and sly.
3. He would be full of ideas with gigantic plans
4. His senses would be blunted with a weakness of memory
The Syphilitic Opium would have:
Physically
1. Painlessness of Complaints.
2. Trembling and Twitching of muscles.
3. Paralytic conditions of bowels, bladder, etc.
4. Comatose and unconsciousness.
Mentally
1. He would appear contented by apathetic.
2. He would be imbecile.
3. He would be ecstatic, eccentric with exalted fancies.
He would be shrieking, screaming and shouting.
Here is an example of how one observes the miasmatic
expression of the case and correlates it with the miasmatic expression
of a multimiasmatic remedy to cure a serious disease.
A lady came for treatment with Cancer of the Cervix. She was dark,
long faced, sharp featured with a slightly distorted bridge of her
nose. She was friendly and loquacious. She was an Assistant Editor
of a leading Hindi Language magazine. She said she resigned from
this post, as her worth had not been recognized. They had not made
her the Editor in spite of working hard for the magazine for over
8 years.
At home she led a restricted life because her husband was very
strict. He was dictatorial, abrupt and aloof. She had to live her
life independent of him because she had virtually no moral or financial
support from him. Her son too did not care for her much.
In these circumstances, she was angry with all "males".
She said that she was a good poet whose poems were very well appreciated.
She specialized on two themes - they were either for small children
or for women/girls.
When she was asked to recite some poems, she recited one she had
written for young girls. The gist of the poem was advising girls
not to be confined to the kitchen, but to come out of their cage
and see the wide world around them. (So far so good!). then she
went on to advise these girls to mercilessly kill the people who
have caged them. Cut them to pieces and feed them to the insects
and rats which are hungry! All this with the intention of advocating
liberty!
When asked to recite a poem she had written for children, her
eyes sparkled. She stated that she wrote unique poems for children.
She started to recite a poem that she titled "Headless".
The poem described a boy of 5 years whose head was cut off. It ended
with other boys teasing this headless boy telling him how beautiful
they looked. But when they looked over a bridge into the water,
the reflection they saw shocked them. All their heads had been cut
off and placed on the body of the headless boy they were teasing!
One can imagine the perversion and distortion of her imagination!
A poem for children should be pleasant, about beauty and full of
joy, but here she wrote on themes that would frighten them to death!
It was clear why her "unique" poems never gained popularity
as also the reason why she never felt appreciated. This is also
the reason why she was not promoted to chief editor and possibly
why her husband remained aloof from her.
This is a syphilitic expression of the remedy, which remains at
the level of the mind with a physical symptom expression. (Note
that there is no obvious expression in social action that one would
expect of a typically and predominantly syphilitic remedy like Merc.)
One need not look into Rubrics of dreams and delusions. What is
characteristic of her is her Egotism of being a 'Unique' person.
The correct rubric in the repertory for her distorted imagination
is:
"MIND; STRANGE; crank; opinions and acts, in (SI-962):
calc., sulph., verat".
Her general symptoms were: Very thirsty with heat of the palms and
soles. The remedy was SULPHUR with syphilitic expression of the
remedy. Sulphur cured her cervical and uterine dysplasia completely
much to the amazement of the gynecologist.
Conclusion
This attempt of presenting Dr. Vijaykar's concepts on miasms hopes
to highlight parts of his insight that are brilliant and very useful
for case management. I have left out concepts included in his books
that were not very relevant clinically or need further elaboration
or modification by him in the future.
We all could do with deeper insight into managing our chronic patients
miasmatically! As I said earlier, a little bit of indepth study
and learning is a must for any homeopath wanting to achieve successful
cures clinically, making use of all the tools at our disposal. It
adds to the sense of fulfillment in our mission to heal the sick.
Do write in with your comments and suggestions.
Dr. Leela D'Souza
http://www.homeopathy2health.com/
Bibliography:
1. The Chronic Diseases, Samuel Hahnemann (Theoretical Part)
2. Organon of Medicine, Samuel Hahnemann
3. The Genius of Homeopathy, Stuart Close, MD
4. Dhawle's ICR Symposiums (Volume C), Mumbai
5. Theory of Suppression, Predictive Homeopathy Part I, Praful Vijaykar,
LCEH
6. The End of Myasumtion of Miasms, Predictive Homeopathy Part III,
Praful Vijaykar, LCEH
7. An Insight into Plants, Rajan Sankaran, LCEH
|