Homeopathy did not appear out of a vacuum. The seeds
of this noble healing art go back 1000's of years to the Bronze
Age and beyond. In the Western tradition the origins of the healing
arts are found in the works of the lineage of Hermes, Asclepius,
Pythagoras and Hippocrates and are linked to works of the ancient
Egyptians, Pelasgians and Indo-Aryans of South Asia. In around 2000BC
to 1800BC tribes of Indo-Aryans migrated to Greece and brought with
them their ancient traditions. They intermingle with the indigenous
Pelasgians-Egyptian lineages and established the Bronze Age European
lineage of philosophy, psychology and healing. These are the seeds.
The gains of the Bronze Age period of integration came to close
with the Dorian invasion of Greece and the area. The art of writing
and recording history was almost lost but the bards and scribes
who had memorized all the important data saved the older knowledge
from being completely lost. This led to the Greek Renaissance in
around 500BC, which was led by a Pelasgian named Pythagoras. Pythagoras
travelled around the entire Mediterranian area, Egypt and India
tracing the teachings to their origins and collecting information.
This led to the rise of the Pythagorean school of metaphysics and
healing.
Pythagoras taught about the music of the spheres and life, as different
frequencies that may be harmonious and dissonant. This "music"
has its "scales and tones" that make up different frequencies
of vibration in the cosmic pneuma, the universal vital force. He
founded the western tradition of classical music, the 7 note scale,
as well as the Pythagorean-Hippocratic lineage of the healing arts.
It was he who spoke of health as harmonious tone of the pneumatic
vital forces and disease as a mistuning of this life power. That
is why we still speak of the nervous or muscular system as having
"tone" and use statements like "feeling in and out
of tune" when speaking of feeling good or bad.
All of these images are part of an ancient archetypal language
that goes back 1000s of years. These definitions are linked to the
German words Stimmung (tone, tuning, atmosphere, aura, good vibrations,
etc) and Virstimmung (dissonance, mistuning, derangement, bad atmosphere,
bad vibration, etc.) found in the Organon of the Healing Art. These
terms have their origin in the Pythagorean-Hippocratic lineage and
have been part of western medicine for 2,500 years.
Pythagoras also elucidated the teaching of the primordial homoeomeries,
which are the essential patterns and forces that are the building
blocks of the macrocosmic and microcosmic universe. The ancients
called these powers the 3 vital forces (+/0/-) and the five elements,
the ether, air, fire, water and earth. In the macrocosm the 3 forces
manifest as the neutral, positive and negative poles and in the
living organisms the psychic force (0), the life force (+) and the
natural force (-).
These three forces are witnessed in the atom as the neutron, proton
and neutron and in the human body as vital wind, heat and cold.
The five elements (earth, water, fire, air, ether) are considered
different frequencies of pneuma in the form of solids, liquids,
incandescence, gases and space. These powers are witnessed in the
macrocosm as gravity, weak nuclear forces, strong nuclear forces,
electromagnetic and space. In the human being they are found in
life energy and the four chemicals that make up the human genes.
In the human body they are also witnessed in the energy centers
and pathways found in the spine, organs, systems and tissues.
The primordial homoeomeries and the elements make up the four classical
temperaments and their 12 mixtures. Hahnemann was very well aware
of this system and one finds references to the classical temperament
and diathetic constitutions in his writings and casebooks. In his
day this knowledge was taken for granted but today few homoeopaths
understand the system. This is because we have forgotten our roots
and lost important parts of our heritage.
These teachings are very similar to the Aryur Veda and Yoga because
they share a common origin and share images known throughout all
the Indo-Aryan peoples from South Asia to Europe. Remember the English
language I am using right now is an Indo-Aryan based language that
goes back to the same ancient Mother tongue in prehistory. Wisdom
from this beginning is still stored in the Collective Unconscious
and is coded in history, mythology, religion, fables and stories.
These archetypal powers were called the primordial homomeries by
Pythagoras, which means the similars from which all things are composed.
The three forces and 5 elements are a symbolic patterns used to
catagorize all phenomena. This was an ancient language that sprang
from the Collective Unconscious in the form of visions, altered
states, dreams and intuition and guided the ancient seers in their
investigation of the outer realms of the universe and the inner
realms of consciousness. Much of this knowledge was lost during
the Dark Ages but during the European Renaissance it reappeared.
Portions of the established Church resisted these changes, so inquisition
was begun to purge culture of "pagan ideas". At this time
the ancient wisdom was driven underground in secret societies and
into alchemical language. This ancient wisdom again went into decline
"during" as the industrial revolution was on the horizon
but the Deists of Europe and America rebelled against the materialistic
scientific paradigm because they wished to integrate the best of
the ancient classical wisdom with the new sciences. Samuel Hahnemann
was one of these individuals as he was a Deist, Mason and Universalist.
He was a master of ancient as well as modern languages and was a
great student of history, metaphysics, philosophy, psychology and
medicine. His studies in all these fields formed the basis for the
development of Homoeopathy.
There is no wonder that many homoeopaths wish to study the seeds,
roots and branches of human thought. It is no surprise that they
wish investigate deeper than the surface and peer into Collective
Unconscious so they can re-enter a world where archetypes function
and images of wisdom appear in the twilight of consciousness. These
impulses to go deeper come from the Self and are part of the process
of Individuation. In this way, they are only walking in the footsteps
of Hermes, Asclepius, Pythagoras, Hippocrates, Paracelsus, Hahnemann,
Goethe and Jung.
MIASMS IN HAHNEMANNIAN HOMOEOPATHY
Hahnemann is the Founder of modern epidemiology. He was very well
aware that infectious diseases are caused by microorganisms and
he called these disease causing powers "miasms". This
word was used by Hippocrates to described epidemic diseases. The
ancient Greeks also used the word "psora" to stand for
a host of skin complaints and their concomitant symptoms. Hahnemann
did not invent these words but he did bring them up to date for
his time. We must do the same.
Hahnemann was the first to introduce a coherent study of infectious
diseases which included constitution, temperament, heredity, predisposition,
susceptibility, the moment of infection, the prodrome, the primary
stage, latent stage, secondary stage and the suppression syndrome.
He also noted that the congenital constitution and environmental
factors are strong conditioning factors in the development of the
pathological symptoms. He once suggested that some skin disorders
were caused by "miasmatic animalcula", i.e. microorganisms.
On the spread of Asian cholera to Europe, Hahnemann
wrote:
"On board ships-in those confined spaces filled with moldy,
water vapors the cholera miasm finds a favorable element for its
multiplication and grows into an enormously increased brood of these
EXCESSIVELY MINUTE, INVISIBLE LIVING CREATURES so inimical to human
life of which the contagious matter of the cholera most probably
consists."
Hahnemann introduced the terms acute, half-acute and chronic miasms
and recorded the differences of these infections most accurately.
On this basis he introduced the collective case taking method so
that he could discover specific genus remedies that had the power
to prevent, abort and treat the affects of these infectious complaints.
On this foundation Hering introduced the nosodes, which are potentized
miasms. He made his own nosodes for several acute miasms as well
as half acute miasms like rabies and chronic miasms like psora,
tuberculous, sycosis, and syphilis. These remedies also play a great
role in preventing, aborting and treating infectious diseases and
their affects.
Hahnemann's early study of infectious diseases and their sequelae
is based on observations of how epidemic diseases affect the human
psyche and soma. Acute miasms are self limiting infections like
cholera that reach their crisis quickly and end in death, recovery
or feeling never-well-since the attack. Half acute miasms are infections
that have a longer incubation period like rabies and reach crisis
after a short to medium period depending on the circumstances. Chronic
miasms are life long infections like syphilis that are not self
limiting and do no naturally resolve over time. Toward the end of
his career Hahnemann noted that the affects of a chronic miasma
like psora could be passed by heredity. These ideas completed the
system. All of this has proved valid by modern science.
On the basis of this information one can say with all certainty
that Hahnemann's definition of the miasma is microorganisms and
miasmic diseases are the negative effects of unresolved infections
on the human organism. This is an early study of acquired infections,
auto-immune states and immuno-deficiency disorders that goes far
beyond the understanding of modern medicine. This may have been
hard to understand in 1828 but in 2005 Hahnemann's teachings have
come of age. It is very surprising that some homoeopaths still don't
realize this! To some the miasms have become everything BUT the
affects of infections on the vital force, the human organism, and
the immune system.
HERING, HEMPEL AND KENT
The origin of the metaphysical concepts of the miasms is Hemple's
comments on Hering's statements in the preface to The Chronic Diseases
Their Peculiar Nature and Their Homœopathic Cure; S. Hahnemann
(Hering’s Preface of Hempel’s Translation, 1845). Hering
wrote:
"The shallow opponents of Homœopathy (and we never
had any other!) pounced upon the theory of the psoric miasm with
a view of attacking it with their hollow and unmeaning sarcasms.
Making Psora to be identical with itch, they sneeringly pretended
that according to Hahnemann’s doctrine the itch was the primitive
evil, and that this doctrine was akin to the doctrine of original
sin recognized by the Christian Faith."
To Hering's statement Hempel added the following
comments:
"As it would be absurd for a philosophical Christian to
reject the doctrine of original sin, so it is absurd for any one
who professes to have a clear perception of Homœopathy, to
reject the doctrine of an hereditary morbific miasm. It is this
principle which Hahnemann calls Psora."
The Deists held the view that human beings were
shaped in perfection and fell from an Eden-like paradise into a
state of delusion and suffering. In Hempel’s additional comments
he quotes the teachings of Rousseau on this subject, which Samuel
learned from his father at a young age.
Hempel continues:
"If we admit with Rousseau that everything which leaves
the hand of God, is perfectly holy, then the first created man must
have been perfectly pure, and must have appeared in the image and
likeness of his maker."
Hempel then proceeds to discuss the fall of humanity from this
Eden-like state. He notes, however, that the decline from this harmonious
state, was in reality, a necessary phase of human development. Experiences
that look like a negative development often have positive long-term
evolutionary goals.
Hempel wrote:
"This is relatively speaking, a fall, although, this fall,
having been the first necessary phase of human development, it may,
in reality, be considered a progress."
Hahnemann never said psora was the original sin
but in The Friend of Health he said that the real blessing in this
world was wisdom and health that beckons one “Back into Eden”,
the archetypal paradise. In the Deist philosophy which Hahnemann
professed, human destiny is to be reunited with Divine Life through
the seeds of the celestial harmonies deposited in human nature.
The delusion of separateness rising out of the human psyche naturally
produces a corresponding negativity in the physical world.
Homœopaths have always held a universal vision that includes
humanity as whole, as collective groups, and as individuals. The
ultimate goal of Homœopathy is the restoration of the human
race to harmony with nature and the spirit.
Hempel continues:
"In proportion as man’s spiritual nature becomes
developed and purified, this psoric miasm will be diminished, and
will finally be completely removed from the life of humanity. This
complete physical regeneration of human nature will necessarily
be attended with great changes in all the external relations of
man, education, mode of laboring, living, etc., etc."
Hempel believed that as humanity’s spiritual nature becomes
purified they would become more immune to psora and the other miasms.
James Tyler Kent’s Lectures on Homœopathic Philosophy
echoed a similar vision of the origin and the fall of humanity.
Boenninghausen taught that innate predispositions
were the proximate cause and that the fundamental cause was psora.
Although the psora stems from prior infection, its ramifications
go back to the ancient of human days.
The first mention of the words "original sin" is found
in Hering and Hempel’s discussion with the critics of the
psora hypothesis. Hering was defending Homoeopathy from the charge
that homoeopaths thought psora was like the original sin. Hempel
tried to turn the same argument around on his opponents by showing
how the Deist looked at such things. About the deeper aspects of
the genesis of disease, James Kent said:
"It is altogether too extensive, for it goes to the very
primitive wrong of the human race, the very first sickness of the
human race, that is the spiritual sickness, from which first state
the race progressed into what may be called the TRUE SUSCEPTIBILITY
TO PSORA which in turn laid the foundation for other diseases."
(Lectures on Homœopathic Philosophy; J. T. Kent, Chronic Diseases
– Psora, page 146.)
Kent does not called psora the origin sin! He says that the spiritual
sickness that developed in humanity is what led to the SUSCEPTIBILITY
TO PSORA. This is really quite different than the idea that psora
IS the original sin. Some have tried to blame Kent for saying psora
was the original sin and say this is all because of Swedenborg's
philosophy. One can see, however, that this discussion predates
Kent and goes back the philosophy of the Deist, which includes Rousseau
and Hahnemann!
MIASMS TODAY
Charles Hempel is responsible for introducing metaphysical ideas
into the subject of the miasms. His source of inspiration was Rousseau,
a principle Deist philosopher with whom Samuel Hahnemann was familiar
with since childhood. Hempel equated psora with the principle division
of the humanity from its spiritual nature. Kent actually sought
to correct this idea by saying that first came the decline from
spiritual perfection and THEN this established the SUSCEPTIBILITY
to psora and all other physical diseases.
As one can see some of today's homoeopaths have taken up a very
metaphysical view of the miasms, which is similar to the ideas of
Hempel. They do not, however, make the clear demarcation between
the perfection & spiritual decline - susceptibility & predisposition
- and physical disease, psora and the miasms like James Kent did!
Are they all followers of Hempel then? It is not surprising that
they are looking for a deeper meaning to health and disease but
they have confused the spiritual and mental decline with its outcome,
which is the susceptibility to physical diseases like psora.
Psora did not come before the susceptibility to psora appeared.
It is understandable, that some persons like Hempel, wish to see
something positive in the fall of humanity, the miasms and human
suffering in general. A wish to see suffering as part of our evolution
is a human need to give meaning to the bitter-sweet qualities of
life. After all, a well treated miasm produces more immunity, vitality
and a better sense of well being. In the long run miasms and anti-miasmic
treatment may make the human race stronger. There may be some truth
in the idea that a greater good may come from what looks bad at
the moment.
Secondly some have mixed up the miasms with the primordial
homoeomeries. They have tried to make psora, sycosis and syphilis
the three forces (0/+/-) rather than realize that the three forces
come BEFORE the miasms! Once again it is a matter of putting the
cart in front of the horse! The miasms, like all phenomena, follow
the patterns of the primordial homoeomeries. This is why they may
say things like a plant has the syphilitic miasm when a plant can't
possibly have syphilis but it can share certain archetypal disease
patterns with human beings.
This is because the same homoeomeries (forces or elements) are
affected in man, animal and plant so the patterns are very similar.
All carbon based organic structures share the Anima Mundi, the vital
principle that comes with the primordial homoeomeries. That is why
similar archetypal patterns can be witness in the plant and animal
realms. Even the mineral world shares these patterns and energies
but in a more inert state (without 'life').
So one can see that the desire for understanding the collective
Unconscious and returning to the roots of our psyche is at the base
of the metaphysical views that have been part of Homoeopathy for
a long time. Even Hahnemann coded certain Deist and Masonic teachings
into the Organon and other writings. The text of aphorism
9 is a perfect example. Some of these words in his writings
come directly from the texts of these traditions. His letters are
full of philosophical and religious counseling as well as suggestions
on diet, exercise and regimen. In one letter he spoke of God as
the "Divine Architect", the true Grand Mason! This is
because one must use every tool available to heal the body, mind
and spirit.
I do not seek to set any boundaries on the human mind nor do I
attempt to set limits of the research of my colleagues. I only ask
that they go deeper and understand the origins of our science,
philosophy and terminology. I only ask that they get their
terms straight so it causes less confusion and ridicule. I only
ask that they educate themselves better by going back to the roots
rather than accepting confused new age ideas. I only ask that they
understand exactly what Hahnemann was talking about when he spoke
of the infectious miasms. I only ask that they learn how to use
the tools Hahnemann left to treat these deadly diseases that kill
1,000,000s every year.
I only ask that they understand the role of the homoeomeries in
Eastern and Western medicine and do not confuse them with the miasms.
I only ask they don't put the cart in front of the horse and go
backwards by using the wrong terms. When we are speaking of the
homoeomeries at least we should use the correct terms. When we are
speaking of the infectious miasms and sequels let us use the correct
terms. We do not need to "get rid" of any of these ideas,
we need to correct the mistakes of the past and move forward with
more knowledge.
I would also request that my colleagues, as they "reach for
the sky" (psyche, homoeomeries, archetypes, metaphysical studies,
etc.) to keep their feet very well "grounded on earth"
(the study of medical science and pathology). I beseech them to
study the *clinical view* of the miasms I have
been speaking about. Hahnemann has left us tremendous tools to treat
the effects of epidemic and endemic infectious diseases but very
few are really using them. When homoeopaths think that miasms are
everything BUT the affects of infectious diseases our science is
in danger of losing one of its greatest assets.
As Hering said it is the duty of all of use to advance Homoeopathy
further than the Founder and correct any mistakes that have entered
our science. We need to bring all this data up to date in accordance
to the latest scientific information without losing our vitalist
principles and sophisticated methods of studying both the group
and individual anamnesis. At the same time, we should investigate
the mysteries of Nature and the human psyche and spirit as deeply
as we possibly can and apply that wisdom to the healing arts.
I have taken the time to write this letter because the healing
arts are a sacred trust. I don't want to argue with people nor get
into long debates but I am willing to stand up for what I believe
in and what I think is in danger of being lost or confused. My fingers
are sore and my eyes are tired but my spirit is strong in the knowledge
that I have given what I have to give without taking anything from
others.
Similia Minimus
Sincerely, David Little
Visit our website on Hahnemannian Homoeopathy and Cyberspace Homoeopathic
Academy at http://www.simillimum.com
|