|
Proceeding with Treatment After Using an Acute Intercurrent
Again Hahnemann guides us very clearly
in Chronic Diseases.
CD The
intelligent homeopathic physician will soon note the point of time
when his remedies have completed the cure of the epidemic intermediate
disease (usually they appear in the form of a fever) and when the
peculiar course of the chronic (psoric) malady is continued. The
symptoms of the original chronic disease will, however, always
be found somewhat varied (altered) after the cure of such a
prevailing intermediate disease. ... The homeopathic physician will
then choose his antipsoric remedy according to the totality of the
remaining symptoms, and not simply give the one
he intended to give before the intermediate disease appeared
(1997, p. 132-133). (Author’s emphasis and words added.)
Therefore, after the acute event (a strong
one, that is), one must retake the case with special emphasis
on any newly appeared symptoms. The most recent and permanent symptoms point to the next remedy.
Some of the chronic symptoms also persist during an acute crisis
and thus obtain a higher value for the selection of the simillimum.
If the same remedy that was serviceable before the acute crisis
is indicated, it may be repeated. If the symptom picture has changed,
the new symptoms must be investigated in relationship to all the
data associated with the chronic strategies used before. This tells
you how disruptive it is to continue administering the chronic remedy
during acute crises! It is also wise, after the acute episode, to
see whether the constitutional state improves greatly without the
administration of any remedy. Better to wait and watch and give
a placebo to please the patient until the VF has been able to produce
all the symptoms you must prescribe on.
Hahnemann further reminds us in Chronic
Diseases to pay attention to another event, which can occur
at this point, after treating the acute event, even when the acute
has been properly treated:
CD Here
is a fitting opportunity to note that the great epidemic diseases
... when they complete their course especially without a judicious
homeopathic treatment, leave the organism so shaken and irritated,
that with many who seem restored, the psora, which was before slumbering
(dormant) and latent now awakes quickly, either into itch-like eruptions
or into chronic disorders, which then reach a high degree in a short
time, if they are not treated properly in an antipsoric manner.
... The allopathic physician, when such a patient ... dies after
all his unsuitable treatment, declares that he has died from the
sequelae of whooping cough, measles, etc.
These
sequelae are, however, the innumerable chronic diseases in
numberless forms of developed psora which (were) unknown and consequently
remained uncured (1997, pp. 133-134). (Author’s words added.)
How often do we see a patient in the clinic
who comes to us and says, “I had this simple cough (or flu, or small
trauma, or small upset), and I have never been well since then.”
These statements are explained by the above quote: this “innocent-appearing
event” has activated the dormant, often psoric miasm, leaving the
patient in a state worse than he ever was before. This is incomprehensible
to the patient and his allopathic physician, but easily managed
by a well-trained homeopath.
Allopathic Recourse
In a footnote to Aphorism 67, Hahnemann
elaborates on situations where allopathic intervention is justified.
A67
Only in the most urgent cases, where danger
to life and imminent death do not allow time for a homeopathic remedy
to act – neither hours, nor often quarter hours, nor even minutes
– in sudden accidents to healthy individuals, such as asphyxiation,
apparent death from lightning, choking, freezing, drowning, etc.,
only in such cases may we and should we as a first measure at least
bring back irritability and sensitivity (physical life) by using
a palliative …
Apart from the previous examples, if an
acute situation becomes dangerously uncontrollable, we can use allopathic
palliative treatment to give us a second chance to find the curative
homeopathic treatment. This situation is an exception – for example,
severe bleeding spells in a patient with chronic ulcerative colitis
– and not at all the same as preferring to give your patients
OTC drugs or antibiotics as acute interventions, for fear of disrupting
the chronic treatment. Obviously those homeopaths do not know the
basic principles of homeopathy. They should know that OTC drugs
(just like other allopathic drugs) cause a dissimilar disease, thus
creating a more complex disease, which is more difficult to treat.
They do a disservice to the patient as well as to other homeopaths
who inherit such cases. And of course, they have passed up a chance
to show how well homeopathy works on acute diseases. The use of
allopathic drugs might be an easy way out for the incompetent or
lazy homeopath, but it will make the management of that patient’s
case a lot more difficult. Antibiotics, for example, may overcome
an acute infection, but they do not help the organism overcome future
infections. After antibiotics, the person is, to a certain degree,
even more susceptible to microorganisms. Some side effects of antibiotics
include yeast overgrowth and destruction of the normal flora. Besides,
homeopathy is superior to any other treatment that exists for infectious
diseases.
What Acute Events Need
an Intercurrent Remedy?
Not treating a serious acute event at
all is a mistake. Due to its nature, an acute disease evolves in
four possible directions. The patient can succumb to it; it will
suspend the chronic disease and can become an independent chronic
state; or it will combine with the existing chronic disease and
create a complex chronic disease, which will be much more difficult
to treat. The best outcome is that the strong VF might overcome
this acute miasm without causing further sequela. “The physician
amuses the patient while Nature cures,” Voltaire said –but this
is not a reason to refrain from treating acutes!
Margaret
Tyler wrote in her book Homeopathic Drug Pictures (in the
lecture on Natrum muriaticum (Nat-m.) about a crisis
situation where she treated a chronic Nat-m. patient with
a severe acute headache. She advises against the use of the chronic
constitutional remedy at this time because it may produce severe
aggravations. Instead, she suggests using the acute of Nat-m.,
Bryonia, to deal with the acute crisis. Afterwards she resumes
the chronic remedy to remove the underlying cause. This advice comes
from years of clinical experience and should not be ignored. It
also means that you do not continue Bryonia once the
acute stage is over, as I have seen some homeopaths do!
Which
acute crisis needs an acute intercurrent remedy rather than a continuation
with the chronic constitutional remedy? As usual, Hahnemann gives
us definite guidelines. In Aphorism 73 of the 6th edition
Organon, Hahnemann describes three kinds of acute
diseases. Group One combines those relating to lifestyle/diet and
miasmatic predisposition; Group Two includes epidemic and acutes
belonging to idiosyncrasy; and Group Three includes acute miasms
such as those belonging to childhood diseases.
Group One acute diseases
Group
One is subdivided into three different
categories.
A.
Acute situations caused by lifestyle or
dietary mistakes
A73 ...
Exciting causes of such acute febrile conditions are: excesses or
privation in eating, traumatisms, chilling or overheating, fatigue
(from poor lifestyle choices), strains from lifting,
etc., or else psychic agitation and upsets (our modern
TV, video games, magazines, and now Internet exposure). (Author’s
notes added.)
These issues are also
discussed in Aphorism 77
A77 Diseases
engendered by prolonged exposure to avoidable noxious influences
should not be called chronic. The include diseases brought about
by:
·
the habitual indulgence in harmful food or drink;
·
all kinds of excesses that undermine health;
·
prolonged deprivation of things necessary to life;
·
unhealthy places, especially swampy regions;
·
dwelling only in cellars, damp workplaces, or other closed quarters;
·
lack of exercise or fresh air;
·
physical or mental overexertion;
·
continuing emotional stress; etc. ...
Hahnemann refers to these
situations also as “false chronic diseases,” since they can become
chronic through continued abuse, but all they will require to be
cured is a sensible change to diet and/or lifestyle. He continues:
A77 These
self-inflicted disturbances go away on their own with improved living
conditions if no chronic miasm is present, and they cannot be called
chronic diseases.
In all these cases no
remedy is required except placebo (if called for) to temper
the demands of the drug-oriented or hypochondriac patient. The best
treatment is rest, sleep, appropriate diet, and TLC.
B.
Acute situations with a clear exciting
factor and strong symptoms
If the exacerbation is
moderate to strong, and a clear causality is manifested,
an intercurrent remedy, which acts superficially on the chronic
miasm, may be chosen according to the VB method, rather than giving
a deep-acting polychrest. This will calm the symptoms for the moment
without acting too deeply on the case. After the crisis has subsided,
complementary constitutional treatment is needed to remove the underlying
cause.
Examples of causality
include:
·
Acute physical trauma
– In these cases the etiology and the organ or tissue affected will
help you identify the remedy. In other words, if the injury is a
puncture wound compared to a blow (e.g., to the eye), it will correspond
to a different remedy (Ledum and
Hypericum versus Arnica and Ruta).
·
Emotional trauma
– You must look at the kind of trauma as well as the patient’s reaction
to the trauma, which will be determined by the patient’s active
miasmatic state. Remember, the trauma can wake up the miasm! The
“Mind” section of Kent’s repertory gives many
examples of emotional causalities. The patient’s miasmatic reaction
to these triggers will help you select the appropriate remedy. For
example, we have the tubercular jealousy of Pulsatilla, the
psoric one of Nux vomica, the syphilitic one of Hyoscyamus,
and the sycotic one of Lachesis.
·
Poisons and vaccinations
– These include cases of street drug use, allopathic drug use, food
poisoning, etc. The best antidote is not the same or isopathic substance
but the most similar remedy. Sometimes you find effects of poisoning
when you look into the “relationship of remedies” and when you look
at what antidotes that remedy. This information
will narrow the group of remedies you need to investigate.
C.
Acute exacerbation of a chronic miasm
For
example, in this situation the patient may have contracted the flu
after losing sleep or partying too much. In this case we do not
always want to interrupt the action of the constitutional remedy
with an intercurrent remedy. If there is no obvious exciting cause,
it may be a healing crisis brought on by the constitutional chronic
remedy. Rest, massage, and hot and cold water treatments (hydrotherapy)
might be sufficient to render the patient comfortable until this
acute exacerbation subsides.
In Third
World countries like Kenya, I have found myself
exposed to situations like those European and American homeopaths
faced at the turn of the 20th century. Many people came
to us in an “acute” stage, excited by physical strain (all the women
in the village where I worked in Kenya had at least four children
and eight was not uncommon), by becoming chilled or overheated,
by eating unsuitable food, mental stress, etc. How many of these
cases are really acute?
As you can see in Aphorism
73, Hahnemann suggests, and experience confirms, that most of these
cases are acute exacerbations of fundamental chronic states and
miasms, activated by exciting causes. When the symptoms do not represent
an extreme crisis, the simillimum, which suits their constitutional
nature, often clears the acute exacerbations and then addresses
the fundamental chronic states. That is the majesty of the grand
simillimum. This may account for statements by homeopaths such as
Massimo Manglialavori who state that it is possible to find a single
remedy to successfully treat both chronic and acute situations.
However, when the same author claims that “he does not believe in
miasms and knows nothing about them,” I wonder about the veracity
of his statement. Don’t we all owe it to our patients to investigate
before we reject the concept of miasms – or worse still, we fail
to investigate at all because of our knee-jerk negative feelings
about miasms? Let’s not fall into allopathic reasoning, which borders
on fear of and hostility towards one of the greatest discoveries
of homeopathy.
Hahnemann says:
A73, In
reality most of these acute diseases are only passing flare-ups
of latent psora, which returns by itself to a dormant state if the
flare-ups are not too violent and if they are quickly eliminated.
Only if the exacerbation
is moderate to severe do we want to intervene with intercurrent
remedies as an emergency measure. Again, the VB method will help
you choose the intercurrent remedy.
In his Lesser Writings,
Kent expresses the same scenario:
The
acute expressions of a chronic disease have a different management
from the acute diseases, e.g., a child suffers from bronchitis at
every change of weather. It may grow worse if treated with the remedy
for the acute symptoms. The miasm that predisposes the child
to recurrent attacks must be considered (Kent, 1994, p. 419).
(Author’s emphasis added.)
Group two acute diseases
A73 Then
there are sporadic acute diseases, which affect a few individuals
at a time here and there, acute diseases brought on by harmful meteorological
or telluric influences to which only a few people are susceptible
at any one time.
This was long recognized
in Traditional Chinese Medicine: certain climate factors are known
to influence specific organs which have an affinity for those conditions,
e.g., cold to kidneys or dampness to spleen-stomach, though only
certain people seem to have a high susceptibility to that particular
climate factor. Sometimes, but not always, these diseases form acute
layers, which repress the constitutional picture until they have
run their course or are removed by homeopathic remedies. These acute
disorders are so closely linked to the patient’s chronic susceptibility
that they can often be treated with their constitutional simillimum.
It is only in emergencies such as sunstroke, dehydration, severe
exposure to cold, anaphylactic reactions, poisoning, and severe
physical or mental trauma that these cases are truly an acute crisis.
In such an exigency, the symptoms will indicate a crisis remedy.
Acute miasms present a different situation from sporadic diseases
because they involve infectious etiologies.
Hahnemann discusses a
second type of sporadic diseases.
A73 Bordering
on these are the epidemic diseases, in which many individuals
are affected very similarly from a similar cause. In crowded areas
they tend to become contagious. These epidemics cause fevers,
each with its own characteristics; and because each case of disease
in the same epidemic has the same origin, those affected manifest
a similar disease process, which, left to itself, ends either in
death or in recovery within a limited time. War, floods, and famine
are often the exciting causes or the breeders of such diseases.
In acute miasms, the
susceptibility factor is closely related to acquired and inherited
miasms and family disorders. For this reason, the remedy for the
acute miasm may also be the remedy for the patient’s constitutional
condition. This is especially common to acute miasms that run a
non-threatening natural course with few or no complications.
This may not be the case, however, when the acute disease is of
a very virulent nature. Because of their intensity, these
acute diseases will suspend the chronic disease and an intercurrent
acute remedy is needed to deal with this new acute natural
disease. It will display a new symptom image that will either run
its course or be removed by homeopathic remedies.
In these circumstances
an acute intercurrent is the remedy of choice. We’ve all seen patients
who have been never well since (NWS) a certain illness. The NWS
acute disease has now become a chronic disease, stronger and dissimilar
to the previously treated chronic disease, which is now suspended.
SARS is a good example.
Deep-acting complementary
remedies (constitutional and anti-miasmatic treatment) must remove
the chronic underlying causes after the acute crisis is ameliorated.
Let the constitutional factors, the nature of the disease, and the
totality of the symptoms (Organon, Aphorisms 5, 6 and 7)
be your guide to the homeopathic remedy, and you will have success.
Follow the revelations of the VF and it will demonstrate, through
causation, signs and symptoms, which remedy it needs. Trust your
recuperated VF to tell you what to do!
Group Three acute diseases
Hahnemann also alludes
to the third kind of acute diseases.
A73 Then
there are those acute miasms that always recur in their own
particular form, which is why they are known by an established name.
Some of them are contracted only once in a lifetime, like smallpox,
measles, whooping cough, ... scarlatina ... mumps, etc., while others
recur frequently in fairly similar ways, like ... the yellow fever
of coastal regions, Asiatic cholera, etc.
We see the same in modern
times: bubonic plague in India; tuberculosis (TB) and
cholera epidemics in South Africa; malaria and TB in Kenya; epidemics during the
war between the Tutsi and Hutu in Rwanda and Burundi or the civil wars in
Zaire; flu epidemics worldwide,
etc. These acute miasms are caused by microorganisms and
are self-limiting but tend to form a quick crisis and end either
with complications, perhaps even death, or convalescence (a person
can fall prey to these illnesses more than once). By contrast, the
once-in-a-lifetime illnesses provide permanent immunity after only
one attack.
All these acute diseases
should be treated with remedies reflecting the picture of the acute
miasmatic state alone – the acute genus epidemicus. A follow-up
with constitutional and anti-miasmatic remedies to remove the underlying
susceptibility is then necessary.
Hahnemann warns us to
not pay attention to the name attached to the epidemic disease,
like the yearly flu in modern times.
A100 In
investigating the totality of symptoms of epidemics and sporadic
diseases, it makes no difference at all whether something similar,
by the same or a different name, has ever appeared in the world
before.
Whether
or not such an epidemic is new or unusual makes no difference either
in the examination or in the cure, since in any case the physician
must presume the true picture of every epidemic to be new and unknown
and must thoroughly examine it as it is in all of its details if
he wants to be a true and thorough physician who never replaces
observation with guesswork, who never lets himself assume that the
treatment of any given case in his care is wholly or partly known
in advance and that he need not carefully seek out all its expressions.
This is all the more necessary because
every epidemic is in many ways unique and upon careful examination
is found to be very different from all previous ones falsely bearing
the same name, the only exceptions being those caused by the same
unvarying infectious agent, such as smallpox, measles, etc.
What a scathing condemnation
of present allopathic practices where the severe flu strain of this
year was treated, of course unsuccessfully, with a vaccination of
the previous flu variety!
Conclusion
We can emphasize that
the proper use of an acute intercurrent in the treatment
of a patient is essential for a speedy cure of a chronic illness.
When and where to use these acute remedies are equally
important issues as when to continue the chronic treatment, especially
when the homeopath should recognize where the acute manifestation
is nothing more than an expression of a chronic miasmatic state.
Homeopaths throwing one acute remedy after another to the unsuspecting
patient for trifling matters, are just as guilty of misconduct as those homeopaths
who refuse to use acute intercurrents under any circumstances. Knowledge
of Hahnemann’s teachings is the only guide!
Bibliography-References
1. Hahnemann, S. 1997. The Chronic Diseases: Their Peculiar Nature and Their
Homeopathic Cure. Translated by L. Tafel, edited by P. Dudley.
New Delhi: B. Jain Publishers Pvt. Ltd.
2. Hahnemann, S. 1982. Organon of Medicine. Sixth Edition. Translated
by J. Kűnzli, A. Naudé and P. Pendleton. Washington: Cooper
Publishing.
3. Kent, J.T. 1979. Lectures on
Homeopathic Philosophy. California: North Atlantic Books.
4. Kent, J.T., 1994. New Remedies,
Clinical Cases, Lesser Writings, Aphorisms & Precepts. New
Delhi: B. Jain Publishers Pvt.Ltd.
5. von Boenninghausen, C.M.F. 1991. Lesser Writings. New Delhi: B. Jain
Publishers Pvt. Ltd.
This article is an excerpt of the new book of Dr Luc, “Achieving and Maintaining
the Simillimum: Strategic Case Management for Successful Homeopathic
Prescribing.” Full of Life Publishing, PO Box 31025, Santa Fe, NM 87594, USA. Dr Luc is the founder and sole teacher of the Renaissance Institute of Classical
Homeopathy since 1993, with schools in Boston, MA, Secaucus, NJ
and Las Vegas, NV. For more info: write drluc@cybermesa.com and see www.drluc.com
|