Dr. BM Benojir Ahmed
I suggest the 7th edition for one reason. Some of the big companies are producing and marketing homeopathic medicines that are made of more than one substances. But there is a clear indication in the 6th edition to prescribe single remedy at a time. To clarify this and for further research on the preparation and doses of remedies we have to think of the 7th edition. There must be a clear indication of the LM potency. Thanks.
	Dr Kulwant Singh
As the times are changing, the temprament, constitution, definition, disease causing elements, environment have changed, new disease causing agents have been recognised, experiments are being accepted and overall change is the only constant thing in the world to survive or come up.
	nikunj
becoz hahnemann ful fill all need up to 6th edittion
	drmanishnigam
in 7th edition thereare some more apporisum are adedd
	anita nicholson
most homeopaths stillm don't follow the teachings of the 6th re the LM potencies
	Dr. Th. Kwaaitaal
1. Why change something that is perfect? 2. A lot of collegues even don't know how to apply the sixth edition!
	drnitinvala
as dr hanemann   wright final sixth edition of organon , himself confess that this is final most edition it is perfect one ,, also people ignore it but by experience it is now all people feel it is right .as of lm potency etc
	past present and future
Because until we have put in practice what Hahnemann advised how can we progress. since he carefully experimented and accurately observed, perhaps ignoring the results and putting them into practice is a time waster. Who starts with 30C and progresses to the 24th 18th as H did? Who rubs the medicine on unaffected parts as directed in the Preface to the Chronic Disease, interestingly found at the back of the theoretical part? Who, lastly, prescribes according to how H advised and practiced and not according to myths propogated to allow anything to go? I would like to meet and discuss with those practicing or having experimented with this approach of H. Until such time, we do not need a 7th edition.
	venu gopala rao (vgpalrv)
Change is always invitable. Research always changes old ideas to new ideas , but just we may afraid a fraction of time to change inventor's work. (I am just a homeopathy lover/admirer but not a professional doctor. soryy I can't propose any changes my self but I felt that something on Homeopathic Mixers should be mentioned .)
	ruthtindall@yahoo.co.uk
Hanhemanns Organon was complete for him, and practitioners have hardly begun to make full use of his 6th organon Re:LM's. There are many things in life which have changed since Hanhemanns death (multiple vaccinations, pollutions beyond his wildest nightmares; no doubt, and humanities understanding of our own complexity) and yet the principles upon which Homoeopathy stand have not changed. the development of homoeopathic understanding can be writen of by others in there own organons, why use Hanhemanns name?