Erecting Totality
Totality is not the sum total of symptoms, but it is a logical
combination of the symptoms which characterizes the person as well
individualize the problem Thus, all the symptoms which are classified
and evaluated do not form a working totality of the case.
From the classification and evaluation, the hierarchy of symptoms
is known, but which, among them, should be useful for getting a
correspondence are yet to be finalized. Thus, a physician is required
to understand the whole symptom and select a few of which can logically
represent the whole picture. This logical arrangement must follow
a definite principle. If the case has got more generals and a few
particulars with rare modalities, it would follow a different arrangement
than a case which has vague modalities and striking concomitants,
or a pathological general.
Totality should be erected according to the facts collected in
the case. There is no hard and fast rule to erect totality in any
fixed way. The case alone decides the method to be followed.
Selection of repertory and repertorisation
proper
After the totality has been erected, the case becomes clear to
the physician. He should look for one of the following points in
the case:-
1. Generals :
Mentals/Physicals.
2
Particulars: Location
Sensation
Modalities
Concomitants
3
Pathological generals.
If a case is full of generals, Kent’s repertory would be the best
selection. If it has got pathological general, Boger’s repertory
must be selected. If the case has got particulars with Location,
Sensation, Modalities, Concomitants with a few mentals, therapeutic
pocket book is preferable; however, Boger’s repertory can also be
used.
Synthetic repertory can be used for the Kent method to refer
to more Generals. It has also many pathological generals, but no
particulars.
Once the repertory is selected, a major part of analysis and synthesis
of the case is done. The next step is to rearrange the totality
according to the repertory selected. Rearrangement of the totality
in terms of repertory selected is called Repertorial Totality.
Thus, a well arranged totality is worked out.
What follows next is to convert the symptoms into rubrics which
requires an acquaintance with the repertory. The symptoms obtained
from the patient may not be found in the repertory in the same form;
so the physician must know the construction and arrangement of the
each repertory.
Rubrics should be arranged according to hierarchy, reason, and
page number. The final out come is written as follows :-
Symptoms Rubrics Reason
Page No.
1 -
- -
2 -
- -
3 -
- -
and so on.
No, at this stage, the case is referred to the repertory, worked
out, and a group of medicines with markings is arrived at.
Repertorial Result
A group of close running medicines should be noted down
according to the symptoms covered and marks obtained. For example,
if Lycopodium covers seven rubrics and gets 18 marks, it should
be written 18/7. A few medicines which are nearer to the first also
find place in the repertorial result.
Analysis and Prescription
The remedy which gets the highest mark is not necessarily
the final remedy in all the cases. Repertorial result should be
finally referred to the court of Materia Medica. Marks are important
but these does not constitute the final verdict. Further the group
has to be referred to the picture of the patient and with the help
of Materia Medica, it should be differentiated. Sounding a note
of caution, Boenninghausen writes, “ for this purpose, he should
not content himself with repertories that have been prepared, a
very frequent carelessness for these books contain only slight
hints as to one or the other remedy that might be selected but can
never take the place of the careful reading up of the fountain sources”.
( The field which differentiates medicines is called Potential Differential
Field )
Repertory, thus narrows down the group of medicines, and
with the help of source books, a final remedy can be found out.
The remedy so selected must finally pass through certain criteria
such as susceptibility, sensibility, suppression ( if any ), the
level of similarity, functional and structural changes, vitality,
and miasm to arrive at right potency and doses schedule.
|