| Preface.
The call from the members of our school for an index of the symptoms
of our materia medica has been insistent ever since the first edition
of the Materia Medica Pura. This call has resulted in the publishing
of several repertories, from the earliest ones, which covered the
few remedies then proven to the last edition of Kent, which is an
index to all the remedies proven homoeopathically or confirmed clinically
to the present time. When members of our school turn to this vast
work for assistance they are confronted with a maze of material,
which, to the uniniated, is more confusing than the materia medica.
It is to help the members of our school who are desirous of mastering
and using the repertory that this little work is presented. The
repertory, the arrangement and use of which I try to make clear
and from which the examples are given, is that of Kent (Second Edition),
as this is the only unabridged work we have and the one that is
most simple and satisfying to use. The general plan of the repertory
work here laid down can be used equally well with any other repertory,
the only change needed being that you must master the arrangement
of your favorite work. Boenninghausen’s Theraputic Pocket
Book, a copy of which is in the library of nearly every homoeopath,
may be used by this plan, although it will be difficult from the
fact of its briefness and the fact that the modalities of the part
and of the generals are mixed together, to work your case to one
remedy; but rather you will have to turn to your materia medica
to differentiate between the last three or more remedies of your
analysis.
In using Allen’s Slip Repertory care must be taken not to
give too high a standing to the nosodes or your final results will
be apt to point to Psorinum or Tuberculinum.
The repertory was never made or intended to take the place of
the materia medica; I cannot lay too great stress on the fact that
it must never replace our constant study and use of the pathogenesis
of our remedies, it should be used as an index to lighten the task
of memory in storing the vast symptomatology of our remedies.
After the repertory has led us to the remedy which we believe
covers our symptom picture, the selection of this remedy should
be confirmed by reading its pathogenesis as given in one of our
complete materia medicas. This not only acts as proof of the results
obtained in the solving of our problems, but also acts as a check
on hurried careless work and at the same time time continually increases
our knowledge of materia medica.
The use of the repertory is one of the higher branches of our
art and before it can be mastered the laws governing the homoeopathic
treatment and cure of diseases, as given to us in the Organon and
the Chronic Diseases, must be learned. Philosophy is rather like
trying to explain a complicated problem of geometry to one who cannot
use arithmetic, to try to teach the use of the repertory to one
who does not comprehend Homoeopathic Philosophy.
It is for this reason that I have begun this volume with a brief
review of the Organon, as it applies to the repertory work, in the
hope that this review will stimulate the desire for further and
continued study of this first and greatest text-book of Homoeopathy.
I firmly believe that if Homoeopathy is to survive in this age of
theraputic nihilism, when so many bastard practices are being fostered
as Homoeopathic, its survival will come from a comprehensive study
of the Organon. Constantine Hering said: “If our school ever
gives up the strict inductive method of Hahnemann we are lost and
deserve only to be mentioned as a caricature in the history of medicine.”
Homoeopathy is form the beginning to the end and art of individualization.
We have to individualize remedies and patients. However convenient
it may seem to be, and however, greatly it appeals to us, to think
of our remedies in connection with disease in the treatment of which
they may be frequently called for, it must always be kept in mind
that to allow our conception of our remedies to be limited by nosological
terms will hinder us from utilizing our remedies to the fullest
extent. To get the greatest good from the materia medica we must
recognize our remedies as powerful curative agents ready to serve
us in any case no matter what the name of the disease may be or
what the laboratory findings may designate.
The analysis of forty remedies which is included in this work
is in no way meant to replace your materia medica, but rather to
help you to systematize these remedies in your memory that they
may be in shape to be readily called forth when occasion demands
and that it may stimulate a desire to so study materia medica that
in each of your cases the one remedy may be found which will serve
you well, furnishing an effectual check upon poly-pharmacy and alternation
of remedies.
It is not alone what the author has to offer to a reader that
tells, it is what the reader can get out of the author, and in the
last resort every homoeopath must be his own materia medica maker.
I think that you will be amply repaid for the time given to a careful
study of this analysis, not only for the usable knowledge of the
remedies that you will have acquired, but also, - and perhaps, of
the greatest importance, - the help it will be to you in enlarging
and compiling your own materia medica.
I wish to take this opportunity of thanking Dr. G. G. Starkey,
of Chicago, for the great assistance given me in revising and editing
the proof of this work.
Glen. I. Bidwell, M. D.
809 South Ave.,
Rochester, New York.
|