Let the Patient Talk.
The next most important requirement is attentive observation.
If we hope to arrive at the truth we must not
only be attentive to what the patient tells us, and to what the
nurse or family may impart, but we must
observe closely the appearance of the patient himself. Ofttimes
the symptom which will lead us to the remedy
will be one which we may get by observation. The way the patient
lies, sits, walks, talks, conducts himself
generally, the appearance of discharges, the color of the eyes,
hair, tongue, skin, etc, all have their place and
are of the greatest importance in our record. Upon your powers of
observation will depend not only the first
image of your case but also your success in conducting the case
after the first prescription has been made.
Three Mistakes
The last group of three relating to the taking of the case will
be the three mistakes made in examining the
case, interruption of patient, asking direct questions and making
answers conform to some remedy we may
have in mind.
A thing of the greatest importance in securing an image of a sickness
is to preserve in the simplist form what
the patient tells you. Let him tell it in his own language, and
unless he digresses too much from the subject do
not interrupt, for by so doing you may lose a line of thought and
may not be able to get him back to it again.
Then do not ask direct questions. You must never put answers into
your patients’ mouths. You need to
know all these particulars but without asking about it directly.
Nine times out of ten the answer to a direct
question will be “yes” or “no;” such answers
are without value and should not be included in the record.
Questions which give a choice of answers are also defective.
Making answers conform to some remedy we may have in mind: a patient
comes in, tells us a few symptoms;
we immediately think of a remedy and begin to ask questions, and
see if we cannot get enough evidence to
convict him of Belladonna, Arsenicum or whatever it may be. It is
surprising how well we can make the
patient give us the symptoms we are looking for, as well as how
little evidence it takes for some of us to make
the conviction and give the remedy. We are more apt to blunder along
this line if we do not write out our
cases. The mere writing of the symptoms helps us keep cool and not
pass hasty judgement. On page 206
Tafel’s translation of Nature of Chronic Diseases we find
“The physician, can, indeed, make no worse
mistake than to consider too small the dose which I (forced by experience)
have reduced after manifold trials
and which are indicated with every antipsoric remedy. Secondly,
the wrong choice of a remedy, and, Thirdly,
the hastiness which does not allow each dose to act its full time.”
In remarking as to the cause of the second mistake, we will quote
from
the same writings, on page 207, as follows:
“As to the second chief error in the cure of chronic diseases
(the unhomoeopathic choice of medicine) the
homoeopathic beginner (many, I am sorry to say, remain such beginners
their life long) sins chiefly through
inexactness, lack of earnestness and through love of ease.
A difficulty may arise in those obscure cases the symptoms of
which have been masked by drugging,
homoeopathic and otherwise, operations etc., so that these cases
only present a few common symptoms, which
can only guide us to a group of remedies in which the similimum
must be found after exhaustive study of the
materia medica.
Many times in these cases before we can make any progress we must
go back through the life of the patient
to childhood and note all symptoms which preceded the pathological
change that now obscures the image of
your case. “Symptoms that existed in childhood and those present
before any pathology existed are the
corresponding symptoms of causes; as all causes are continuous into
effects. They give us an image of the
case from causes to pathological endings. These symptoms through
childhood down to present are greatly
important and describe the progress of sickness.”
|